Literature DB >> 15328174

Immunohistochemical and clinical characterization of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma.

Torsten O Nielsen1, Forrest D Hsu, Kristin Jensen, Maggie Cheang, Gamze Karaca, Zhiyuan Hu, Tina Hernandez-Boussard, Chad Livasy, Dave Cowan, Lynn Dressler, Lars A Akslen, Joseph Ragaz, Allen M Gown, C Blake Gilks, Matt van de Rijn, Charles M Perou.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Expression profiling studies classified breast carcinomas into estrogen receptor (ER)+/luminal, normal breast-like, HER2 overexpressing, and basal-like groups, with the latter two associated with poor outcomes. Currently, there exist clinical assays that identify ER+/luminal and HER2-overexpressing tumors, and we sought to develop a clinical assay for breast basal-like tumors. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: To identify an immunohistochemical profile for breast basal-like tumors, we collected a series of known basal-like tumors and tested them for protein patterns that are characteristic of this subtype. Next, we examined the significance of these protein patterns using tissue microarrays and evaluated the prognostic significance of these findings.
RESULTS: Using a panel of 21 basal-like tumors, which was determined using gene expression profiles, we saw that this subtype was typically immunohistochemically negative for estrogen receptor and HER2 but positive for basal cytokeratins, HER1, and/or c-KIT. Using breast carcinoma tissue microarrays representing 930 patients with 17.4-year mean follow-up, basal cytokeratin expression was associated with low disease-specific survival. HER1 expression was observed in 54% of cases positive for basal cytokeratins (versus 11% of negative cases) and was associated with poor survival independent of nodal status and size. c-KIT expression was more common in basal-like tumors than in other breast cancers but did not influence prognosis.
CONCLUSIONS: A panel of four antibodies (ER, HER1, HER2, and cytokeratin 5/6) can accurately identify basal-like tumors using standard available clinical tools and shows high specificity. These studies show that many basal-like tumors express HER1, which suggests candidate drugs for evaluation in these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15328174     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  859 in total

1.  Expression of SIRT1 is associated with lymph node metastasis and poor prognosis in both operable triple-negative and non-triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Minqing Wu; Weidong Wei; Xiangsheng Xiao; Jiaoli Guo; Xinhua Xie; Laisheng Li; Yanan Kong; Ning Lv; Weihua Jia; Yin Zhang; Xiaoming Xie
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  TBCRC 001: randomized phase II study of cetuximab in combination with carboplatin in stage IV triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Lisa A Carey; Hope S Rugo; P Kelly Marcom; Erica L Mayer; Francisco J Esteva; Cynthia X Ma; Minetta C Liu; Anna Maria Storniolo; Mothaffar F Rimawi; Andres Forero-Torres; Antonio C Wolff; Timothy J Hobday; Anastasia Ivanova; Wing-Keung Chiu; Madlyn Ferraro; Emily Burrows; Philip S Bernard; Katherine A Hoadley; Charles M Perou; Eric P Winer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Histological types of breast cancer: how special are they?

Authors:  Britta Weigelt; Felipe C Geyer; Jorge S Reis-Filho
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2010-04-18       Impact factor: 6.603

4.  Prognosis in very young women with triple-negative breast cancer: retrospective study of 216 cases.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Tao Xin; Da-yong Huang; Wei-xi Shen; Li Li; Yan-ju Lv; Ying-hua Jin; Xiao-wei Song; Chong Teng; Qiu-ying Jiang
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  Identification of human triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and preclinical models for selection of targeted therapies.

Authors:  Brian D Lehmann; Joshua A Bauer; Xi Chen; Melinda E Sanders; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Yu Shyr; Jennifer A Pietenpol
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Triple-negative and HER2 positive ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: characteristics, behavior, and biomarker profile.

Authors:  Satoshi Takahashi; Aye Aye Thike; Valerie Cui Yun Koh; Hironobu Sasano; Puay Hoon Tan
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 4.064

7.  Cytokeratin 5/6, c-Met expressions, and PTEN loss prognostic indicators in triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Mevlude Inanc; Metin Ozkan; Halit Karaca; Veli Berk; Oktay Bozkurt; Ayse Ocak Duran; Ersin Ozaslan; Hulya Akgun; Fatos Tekelioglu; Ferhan Elmali
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 3.064

8.  Igf1r as a therapeutic target in a mouse model of basal-like breast cancer.

Authors:  Apostolos Klinakis; Matthias Szabolcs; Guoying Chen; Shouhong Xuan; Hanina Hibshoosh; Argiris Efstratiadis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  N0436 (Alliance): A Phase II Trial of Irinotecan With Cetuximab in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Exposed to Anthracycline and/or Taxane-Containing Therapy.

Authors:  Jennifer A Crozier; Pooja P Advani; Betsy LaPlant; Timothy Hobday; Anthony J Jaslowski; Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia; Edith A Perez
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Alcohol consumption and risk of breast cancer by molecular subtype: Prospective analysis of the nurses' health study after 26 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Kelly A Hirko; Wendy Y Chen; Walter C Willett; Bernard A Rosner; Susan E Hankinson; Andrew H Beck; Rulla M Tamimi; A Heather Eliassen
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 7.396

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.