Synthetic photochromic compounds can be designed to control a variety of proteins and their biochemical functions in living cells, but the high spatiotemporal precision and tissue penetration of two-photon stimulation have never been investigated in these molecules. Here we demonstrate two-photon excitation of azobenzene-based protein switches and versatile strategies to enhance their photochemical responses. This enables new applications to control the activation of neurons and astrocytes with cellular and subcellular resolution.
Synthetic photochromic compounds can be designed to control a variety of proteins and their biochemical functions in living cells, but the high spatiotemporal precision and tissue penetration of two-photon stimulation have never been investigated in these molecules. Here we demonstrate two-photon excitation of azobenzene-based protein switches and versatile strategies to enhance their photochemical responses. This enables new applications to control the activation of neurons and astrocytes with cellular and subcellular resolution.
The large number of
photoswitchable biomolecules discovered and
developed in recent years covers a great variety of cellular functions,
like catalysis of metabolic processes,[1,2] cytoskeletal
polymerization[3] and motors,[2,4] nucleic acids dynamics,[5−7] intracellular signaling,[8,9] and, perhaps most dazzling, membrane excitability, which has been
at the focus of optogenetics[10] and optopharmacology.[11] The dream of precisely and remotely photocontrolling
every aspect of the cell’s inner workings in intact tissue
appears within reach and offers the promise of interrogating complex
cellular processes to discover their molecular mechanisms.[12]In order to take full advantage of light-regulated
proteins, multiphoton
excitation with near-infrared (NIR) light provides sub-micrometric
resolution in three dimensions,[13] deep
penetration into tissue,[14] and patterned
illumination.[15,16] However, to be adapted to two-photon
stimulation technology, the light response of natural photoswitchable
proteins like Channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) must often be adjusted by
mutating the tight binding pocket of the natural chromophore, which
has fixed photochemical characteristics.[17,18] In contrast, synthetic photoswitches developed by optochemical genetics
and optopharmacology are based on chromophores that act on the protein
surface and thus offer excellent opportunities for rationally tuning
their photochemical behavior by chemical substitutions that do not
affect the functional properties of the protein.[19−22] Remarkably, two-photon stimulation
of synthetic photoswitchable proteins has not been investigated despite
the advances of neurotransmitter uncaging[23] and optogenetics[24,25] using pulsed NIR illumination.To demonstrate the multiphoton activation of synthetic photoswitches,
we chose ion channels because they constitute highly sensitive transducers
of chromophore isomerization (potentially up to the single channel
level). In particular, we focused on the well-characterized light-gated
glutamate receptor (LiGluR),[26,27] a GluK2 kainate receptor-channel
that is chemically conjugated to a maleimide–azobenzene–glutamate
photoswitch (MAG 1, Figure 1a).
Azobenzene trans–cis photoisomerization[28] of this photoswitchable tethered ligand (PTL)
allows the efficient activation of the receptor upon one-photon absorption
of violet or blue radiation (open LiGluR, Figure 1b), a process that can be reverted back either by absorption
of green light or thermal relaxation in the dark (closed LiGluR, Figure 1b).[21,26,27]
Figure 1
(a)
Structures of the photoswitchable tethered ligands applied
to the two-photon control of LiGluR: MAG (1), MAG2p (2), and MAGA2p (3).
(b) Operating mode of different PTLs on LiGluR. Violet (one-photon)
or NIR (two-photon) light excitation induces glutamate recognition
and channel opening via trans–cis isomerization,
which results in ion flow across the membrane. This process is reverted
by illumination with visible light (one-photon excitation) for LiGluR-MAG
and by thermal back-isomerization for LiGluR-MAG2p and
LiGluR-MAGA2p.
(a)
Structures of the photoswitchable tethered ligands applied
to the two-photon control of LiGluR: MAG (1), MAG2p (2), and MAGA2p (3).
(b) Operating mode of different PTLs on LiGluR. Violet (one-photon)
or NIR (two-photon) light excitation induces glutamate recognition
and channel opening via trans–cis isomerization,
which results in ion flow across the membrane. This process is reverted
by illumination with visible light (one-photon excitation) for LiGluR-MAG
and by thermal back-isomerization for LiGluR-MAG2p and
LiGluR-MAGA2p.To control LiGluR using multiphoton excitation, here we have
investigated
the performance of MAG and two new MAG derivatives (2 and 3, Figure 1a) upon pulsed
NIR illumination. Compounds 2 and 3 were
devised to enhance the two-photon excitation response of the symmetrically
substituted azobenzene chromophore in MAG, which is expected to be
poor.[29,30] We tested two design concepts using a modular
architecture. In compound 2 we introduced an asymmetric
aminoazobenzene with sufficiently strong push–pull character
as to enhance its two-photon absorption cross-section (MAG2p).[29−32] In addition, the presence of the electron-donating tertiary amine
in the 4-position should dramatically decrease the thermal stability
of its cis state in physiological conditions,[21] thus resulting in fast spontaneous cis–trans back-isomerization and, as such, enabling single-wavelength operation
of the switch. This behavior is also expected for 3 containing
the same azobenzene core as MAG2p. However, a novel scheme
was exploited in this compound to enhance its nonlinear optical response,
which consists in the introduction of a light-harvesting antenna to
sensitize the trans–cis isomerization of the
system by absorption of NIR radiation and subsequent resonant electronic
energy transfer (RET) to the trans-azobenzene group.[33] Because of its maleimide–azobenzene–glutamate–antenna
structure, we named compound 3 as MAGA2p.
A naphthalene derivative was selected as antenna because of (i) its
high two-photon absorption cross-section,[34] (ii) the large spectral overlap between its emission and the absorption
of the trans isomer of the aminoazobenzene group
in 3, and (iii) its reduced size, to minimize potential
steric hindrance effects on the glutamate-binding site of the receptor.
Results
and Discussion
Synthesis of MAG2p and MAGA2p
The preparation of compounds MAG2p and
MAGA2p was achieved via a multistep modular synthetic sequence
allowing
structural diversity in the final compounds as well as the additional
incorporation of a photo-harvesting antenna in 3 (Scheme 1). In both cases, we took the N,N-orthogonally diprotected l-lysine 4 as scaffold, to which the different functional fragments
of the target compounds were sequentially introduced: O-protectedaminoazobenzene 5, fully protected glutamate
derivative 6, naphthalene derivative 7,
and furan-protected maleimide 8. These fragments were
obtained from commercial products as described in the Supporting Information. With respect to the synthesis
of MAG,[26] several changes were realized
in our procedure. First, a branching point was inserted between the
glutamate and azobenzene moieties to facilitate the incorporation
of additional functional units to the PTL structure. Second, we introduce
herein the use of 6 and 8 as more robust,
versatile, and convenient precursors of glutamate and maleimide moieties
during the multistep synthesis of novel MAG derivatives.
Scheme 1
Total Synthesis
of MAG2p (2) and MAGA2P (3)
Reagents and conditions: (a) 5, HATU, DIPEA, THF (89%); (b) 37% HCl, MeOH (93%); (c) 6, EDCI, HOBt, DIPEA, THF (88%); (d) 20% piperidine/DMF (87%);
(e) 7, EDCI, DIPEA, THF (81%); (f) 20% piperidine/DMF
(64%); (g) ClCOCH3, pyridine, THF (69%); (h) 37% HCl, MeOH
(93%); (i) 6, EDCI, HOBt, DIPEA, THF (71%); (j) RhCl(PPH3)3, EtOH/H2O, reflux; (k) HgO, HgCl2, acetone/H2O, reflux; (l) 8, Ph3P, DIAD, THF (81%, over the three steps, for 13a, 27% for 13b); (m) toluene, reflux; (n) TFA, CH2Cl2 (81% over the two steps for 2,
86% for 3). Abbreviations: HATU, O-(7-azabenzotriazol-1-yl)-N,N,N′,N′-tetramethyluronium hexafluorophosphate; DIPEA,
diisopropylethylamine; EDCI, N-ethyl-N′-(3-dimethyldiaminopropyl)-carbodiimide HCl; HOBt, 1-hydroxybenzotriazole
hydrate; DIAD, diisopropyl azodicarboxylate.
Total Synthesis
of MAG2p (2) and MAGA2P (3)
Reagents and conditions: (a) 5, HATU, DIPEA, THF (89%); (b) 37% HCl, MeOH (93%); (c) 6, EDCI, HOBt, DIPEA, THF (88%); (d) 20% piperidine/DMF (87%);
(e) 7, EDCI, DIPEA, THF (81%); (f) 20% piperidine/DMF
(64%); (g) ClCOCH3, pyridine, THF (69%); (h) 37% HCl, MeOH
(93%); (i) 6, EDCI, HOBt, DIPEA, THF (71%); (j) RhCl(PPH3)3, EtOH/H2O, reflux; (k) HgO, HgCl2, acetone/H2O, reflux; (l) 8, Ph3P, DIAD, THF (81%, over the three steps, for 13a, 27% for 13b); (m) toluene, reflux; (n) TFA, CH2Cl2 (81% over the two steps for 2,
86% for 3). Abbreviations: HATU, O-(7-azabenzotriazol-1-yl)-N,N,N′,N′-tetramethyluronium hexafluorophosphate; DIPEA,
diisopropylethylamine; EDCI, N-ethyl-N′-(3-dimethyldiaminopropyl)-carbodiimide HCl; HOBt, 1-hydroxybenzotriazole
hydrate; DIAD, diisopropyl azodicarboxylate.The synthesis of both MAG2p and MAGA2p began
by the coupling reaction of 4 with aminoazobenzene 5 to afford the common intermediate 9, from which
the synthetic pathways diverged. For the synthesis of MAG2p, acid removal of the tert-butyl carbamate protection
of 9 was followed by the coupling reaction of the resulting
amine with glutamate derivative 6, basic deprotection
of the terminal amine, and its acetylation to furnish intermediate 12a. In the case of MAGA2p, the best results were
obtained by deprotecting first the amino terminus and proceeding through
its reaction with the antenna fragment 7 to deliver 11. Removal of the carbamate protection and coupling with 6 then furnished compound 12b. From intermediates 12a and 12b, the next synthetic steps were analogous
for both ligands: removal of the allyl protecting group, introduction
of the furan-protected maleimide 8 under Mitsunobu conditions,
release of the maleimide moiety via a retro-Diels–Alder reaction,
and cleavage of the tert-butyl carbamate and ester
protections, thus finally affording the target compounds MAG2p and MAGA2p.
Photochemical Characterization of MAG2p and MAGA2p
Figure 2a plots the electronic
absorption spectra of the initial trans state of
compounds 1–3 and of the photo-harvesting
antenna tethered to MAGA2p (see also Figures S1 and S2
in the Supporting Information). Owing to
the 4-amino substituent introduced in the azobenzene core of trans-MAG2p and trans-MAGA2p,[21,35] the absorption maximum of the
azoaromatic π→π* electronic transition of these
compounds clearly bathochromically shifts with respect to trans-MAG (∼50 nm in DMSO). This allows the trans–cis photoisomerization of MAG2p and
MAGA2p to occur upon illumination with blue light instead
of violet radiation. As shown in Figure 2b,
excitation of both ligands at 473 nm led to a noticeable decrease
of their π→π* absorption band, a typical signature
of photoinduced cis isomer formation.[35] This was further confirmed by 1H
NMR measurements in DMSO-d6, which revealed
that the relative concentration of cis-MAG2p and cis-MAGA2p in the resulting photostationary
mixtures was 58% in both cases. Such photoproducts can be transformed
into their corresponding trans isomers by irradiation
with green light, as previously reported for MAG[26,27] (Figure S3 in the Supporting Information). In the case of MAG2p and MAGA2p, however,
spontaneous thermal cis–trans isomerization
plays a significant role in the recovery of the initial state of the
ligands, and it strongly competes with cis–trans photoisomerisation due to the lower stability of their cis isomers. This effect is ascribed to the introduction of a 4-amino
substituent in the azobenzene moiety of MAG2p and MAGA2p,[21,35] and it is expected to be dramatically
enhanced in aqueous media.[36] Thus, while
the lifetimes of cis-MAG2p and cis-MAGA2p in the dark at room temperature are
∼75 min in DMSO (see Figure S4 in the Supporting
Information), they further drop off down to the millisecond
time scale in aqueous buffer (τ = 118 and 96 ms in 80% PBS:
20% DMSO, respectively; Figure 2c). This allows
repetitive trans–cis isomerization of MAG2p and MAGA2p at high frequencies in aqueous media
with a single irradiation source, which we have exploited to demonstrate
the high photostability of these light-responsive ligands (Figure
S5 in the Supporting Information).
Figure 2
(a) Absorption
spectra in DMSO of trans-MAG, trans-MAG2p, trans-MAGA2p, and
the free naphthalene photo-harvesting antenna. Each
spectrum was normalized to its maximum. (b) Absorption spectra of trans-MAG2p and trans-MAGA2p (solid lines), and the photostationary states obtained upon
photoexcitation of these compounds in DMSO at λexc = 473 nm (dashed lines). (c) Variation of the absorption at λ
= 450 nm of trans–cis mixtures of MAG2p and MAGA2p in the dark at 25 °C in 80% PBS:20%
DMSO. At these conditions, thermal cis–trans back-isomerization takes place, thus restoring the initial concentration
of the trans state of the ligands, which presents
a larger extinction coefficient at λabs = 450 nm.
Solid lines correspond to the experimental data, while dashed lines
were obtained from monoexponential fits.
(a) Absorption
spectra in DMSO of trans-MAG, trans-MAG2p, trans-MAGA2p, and
the free naphthalene photo-harvesting antenna. Each
spectrum was normalized to its maximum. (b) Absorption spectra of trans-MAG2p and trans-MAGA2p (solid lines), and the photostationary states obtained upon
photoexcitation of these compounds in DMSO at λexc = 473 nm (dashed lines). (c) Variation of the absorption at λ
= 450 nm of trans–cis mixtures of MAG2p and MAGA2p in the dark at 25 °C in 80% PBS:20%
DMSO. At these conditions, thermal cis–trans back-isomerization takes place, thus restoring the initial concentration
of the trans state of the ligands, which presents
a larger extinction coefficient at λabs = 450 nm.
Solid lines correspond to the experimental data, while dashed lines
were obtained from monoexponential fits.Although the incorporation of a photo-harvesting antenna
negligibly
affects the intrinsic photochemical behavior of the azobenzene group
of MAGA2p with respect to MAG2p, it provides
ligand 3 with some additional optical properties. Thus, trans-MAGA2p displays an extra band in the absorption
spectrum (λmax = 385 and 380 nm in DMSO and 80% PBS:20%
DMSO, respectively), which arises from the naphthalene sensitizer
(Figure 2a and Figure S1 in the Supporting Information). The fluorescence emission
of this group is however strongly quenched upon covalent attachment
to the ligand, with a ∼20-fold decrease in fluorescence quantum
yield measured in aqueous buffer (Φantenna = 0.43
and Φ = 0.02;
Figure 3a). This indicates the occurrence of
efficient RET processes from the photoexcited naphthalene antenna
to the azo moiety of trans-MAGA2p, in
agreement with the large Förster radius calculated for this
donor–acceptor pair (see Figure S6 in the Supporting Information). Consequently, photosensitized trans–cis isomerization should take place in this
ligand, as demonstrated in Figure 3b: ∼60%
increase in trans–cis photoconversion was
determined for MAGA2p with respect to MAG2p upon
selective irradiation of the naphthalene antenna at λexc= 355 nm.
Figure 3
(a) Fluorescence emission spectra in 80% PBS:20% DMSO of trans-MAGA2p and the photo-harvesting antenna
tethered to this ligand. The spectra are normalized relative to the
excitation intensity and the absorption at the excitation wavelength
(λexc = 355 nm). (b) trans–cis photoconversion efficiency of trans-MAG2p and trans-MAGA2p upon irradiation at
λ = 355 nm in DMSO, which allows nearly selective excitation
of trans-MAGA2p sensitizer (see Figure 2a).
(a) Fluorescence emission spectra in 80% PBS:20% DMSO of trans-MAGA2p and the photo-harvesting antenna
tethered to this ligand. The spectra are normalized relative to the
excitation intensity and the absorption at the excitation wavelength
(λexc = 355 nm). (b) trans–cis photoconversion efficiency of trans-MAG2p and trans-MAGA2p upon irradiation at
λ = 355 nm in DMSO, which allows nearly selective excitation
of trans-MAGA2p sensitizer (see Figure 2a).
Electrophysiological Characterization of MAG, MAG2p, and
MAGA2p under One- and Two-Photon Stimulation
We
next tested MAG, MAG2p, and MAGA2p to photoswitch
LiGluR in living cells using one- and two-photon stimulation. We expressed
GluK2-L439C-eGFP in HEK293 cells and incubated them in MAG, MAG2p, or MAGA2p in order to allow the selective conjugation
of the PTLs to the cysteine introduced at position L439C of the receptor.
For each compound, we recorded the corresponding photocurrents generated
upon light-induced opening of LiGluR channels using whole-cell patch
clamp[26,27] (see the Supporting
Information).One-photon LiGluR currents were obtained
when the receptor was conjugated with the new compounds (Figures 4 and 5a). The magnitude of
the photocurrent response was not reduced after repeated stimulations,
demonstrating the photostability of these compounds after protein
conjugation (Figure 4b,c and Figure S8 in the Supporting Information). Figure 4 shows that for one-photon excitation, the wavelength dependence
of current amplitude measured is different for each PTL. Photocurrent
amplitudes at different wavelengths were quantified from electrophysiological
recordings obtained for the three compounds (Figure 4a–c), and the corresponding one-photon action spectra
were calculated (Figure 4d). Introduction of
the 4-amino substituent in the azo core allows the one-photon action
spectra of MAG2p and MAGA2p to red-shift ∼60
nm with respect to that of MAG, as recently reported for a similar
compound[21] (Figure 4d and Table S1 in the Supporting Information). An additional peak is observed for MAGA2p at λ
= 360 nm, which lies very close to the absorbance band of the naphthalene
moiety (see Figure 2a). Thus, sensitization
of the azobenzene photoisomerization by the antenna also occurs when
the photoswitch is conjugated to LiGluR. In addition, the time course
of the MAG2p and MAGA2p one-photon currents
(blue and red traces in Figure 5a) confirms
that fast spontaneous cis–trans back-isomerization
and channel closure takes place after the illumination is switched
off, while it requires irradiation with green light for MAG (black
trace in Figure 5a). By fitting the one-photon
current decays in the dark with monoexponential functions, the lifetimes
of cis-MAG2p and cis-MAGA2p tethered to LiGluR were determined to be 150 and 265 ms,
respectively (Table S1 in the Supporting Information). These values are larger than those measured in solution (see above),
which suggests that the ligand-binding site interaction slows down
the thermal cis–trans isomerization of the
azobenzene-based switches. This effect is enhanced for MAGA2p probably due to additional hydrophobic interactions and/or steric
hindrance effects arising from the tethered naphthalene antenna.
Figure 4
Whole-cell
voltage-clamp current recordings in HEK293 cells expressing
GluK2-L439C after conjugation to (a) MAG, (b) MAG2p, and
(c) MAGA2p. Current responses to one-photon light pulses
of wavelengths ranging from 325 to 575 nm were quantified. (Note that
in (a) resting λ = 500 nm induces LiGluR deactivation, and in
(b) and (c) resting λ = 690 nm is not absorbed and allows thermal
relaxation of these photoswitches.) (d) Normalized one-photon action
spectra corresponding to MAG (black), MAG2p (blue), and
MAGA2p (red) (N = 2 cells, N = 3–8 cells, and N = 4–10 cells,
respectively). Before averaging over different cells, wavelength-dependent
current amplitudes were normalized to the maximum photocurrent along
the spectral range measured for each cell. Errors are SEM.
Figure 5
(a) One- and (b) two-photon whole-cell voltage-clamp recordings
on HEK293 cells expressing LiGluR conjugated with MAG (black), MAG2p (blue), and MAGA2p (red). Bars indicate stimulation
pulses applied to open (one-photon pulses in violet and blue, two-photon
pulses in gray) and close LiGluR (one-photon pulses in green). Irradiation
wavelengths are given in each case. Two-photon excitation conditions:
MAG (λ = 820 nm, 10 scans of 0.4 s, 38 mW on sample), MAG2p (λ = 900 nm, 0.4 s scan, 30 mW on sample), and MAGA2p (λ = 880 nm, 0.4 s scan, 42 mW on sample).
Whole-cell
voltage-clamp current recordings in HEK293 cells expressing
GluK2-L439C after conjugation to (a) MAG, (b) MAG2p, and
(c) MAGA2p. Current responses to one-photon light pulses
of wavelengths ranging from 325 to 575 nm were quantified. (Note that
in (a) resting λ = 500 nm induces LiGluR deactivation, and in
(b) and (c) resting λ = 690 nm is not absorbed and allows thermal
relaxation of these photoswitches.) (d) Normalized one-photon action
spectra corresponding to MAG (black), MAG2p (blue), and
MAGA2p (red) (N = 2 cells, N = 3–8 cells, and N = 4–10 cells,
respectively). Before averaging over different cells, wavelength-dependent
current amplitudes were normalized to the maximum photocurrent along
the spectral range measured for each cell. Errors are SEM.(a) One- and (b) two-photon whole-cell voltage-clamp recordings
on HEK293 cells expressing LiGluR conjugated with MAG (black), MAG2p (blue), and MAGA2p (red). Bars indicate stimulation
pulses applied to open (one-photon pulses in violet and blue, two-photon
pulses in gray) and close LiGluR (one-photon pulses in green). Irradiation
wavelengths are given in each case. Two-photon excitation conditions:
MAG (λ = 820 nm, 10 scans of 0.4 s, 38 mW on sample), MAG2p (λ = 900 nm, 0.4 s scan, 30 mW on sample), and MAGA2p (λ = 880 nm, 0.4 s scan, 42 mW on sample).Using a custom-built multiphoton setup where a
tightly focused
fs laser is raster scanned over the cells of interest, all three PTLs
display robust and LiGluR-specific photocurrents in living cells that
first demonstrate two-photon stimulation with NIR light of a synthetic
photoswitchable protein (Figure 5b and Figures
S9 and S10 in the Supporting Information). The amplitude of the responses follows the characteristic power
dependence of two-photon absorption processes (Figure S11 in the Supporting Information) and corresponds to 10–20%
of the photocurrent under one-photon excitation (Table S2 in the Supporting Information). In order to optimize
the multiphoton stimulation conditions we characterized the two-photon
action spectrum of each PTL (Figure 6a). The
wavelength that yields maximal two-photon responses of MAG is around
820 nm. Repeated cell raster scans are required to get a saturating
photocurrent from all available receptors (black trace in Figure 5b). Then, the current remains stable without laser
illumination until LiGluR is closed with 500 nm light via one-photon cis–trans back-photoisomerization. The MAG2p two-photon action spectrum is red-shifted and yields maximum current
amplitude around 900 nm. The reduced currents obtained from MAGA2p hindered the acquisition of a detailed action spectrum,
but are sufficient to identify two spectral ranges allowing two-photon
activation of LiGluR: the first can be found at ∼880 nm (corresponding
to the direct absorbance of azobenzene, as in MAG2p), and
the second is located around 740 nm and is consistent with the naphthalene-sensitized
photoisomerization.[34]
Figure 6
(a) Two-photon action
spectra of LiGluR-MAG (black) and LiGluR-MAG2p (blue) and
two-photon activation of LiGluR-MAGA2p (red) at selected
wavelengths. Photocurrent amplitudes were corrected
for the different power densities used (PD), averaged over all cells
measured, and normalized to the spectral maximum. (b) Absolute two-photon
(2P) responses at the optimal wavelength. For MAGA2p values
are given for sensitized (λ = 740 nm) and direct (λ =
880 nm) azobenzene excitation. (c) Ratio between the two- and one-photon
responses (2P/1P). To compare between different LiGluR-tethers,
two-photon responses were corrected for the distinct power densities
and excitation times used and averaged over all cells measured. In
all spectra here, N = 1–6 cells and errors
are SEM.
(a) Two-photon action
spectra of LiGluR-MAG (black) and LiGluR-MAG2p (blue) and
two-photon activation of LiGluR-MAGA2p (red) at selected
wavelengths. Photocurrent amplitudes were corrected
for the different power densities used (PD), averaged over all cells
measured, and normalized to the spectral maximum. (b) Absolute two-photon
(2P) responses at the optimal wavelength. For MAGA2p values
are given for sensitized (λ = 740 nm) and direct (λ =
880 nm) azobenzene excitation. (c) Ratio between the two- and one-photon
responses (2P/1P). To compare between different LiGluR-tethers,
two-photon responses were corrected for the distinct power densities
and excitation times used and averaged over all cells measured. In
all spectra here, N = 1–6 cells and errors
are SEM.Remarkably, multiphoton currents
mediated by MAG2p and
MAGA2p completely saturate after a few laser scans of the
recorded cell (blue and red traces in Figure 5b). In addition, their rapid relaxation allows LiGluR to close immediately
after the end of each stimulus, with time constants similar to those
obtained with one-photon illumination (Table S2 in the Supporting Information), which enable fast, repeated
activation of the receptor without requiring a second irradiation
source for deactivation. Thus, the novel compounds MAG2p and MAGA2p enable single-wavelength, multiphoton gating
of LiGluR. However, MAG achieves higher two-photon current amplitudes
than MAG2p and MAGA2p in the long term (Figure 6b), because the thermal stability of its cis isomer allows building up a larger population of open-state
channels upon repeated cell raster scans (Figure S12 in the Supporting Information). To compare the efficacy
of LiGluR activation between PTLs, we calculated the ratio between
two-photon and one-photon maximal responses (Figure 6c). Noticeably, MAG2p and MAGA2p (both
via direct and sensitized azobenzene excitation) display a higher
ratio than MAG, thereby demonstrating that the efficiency of multiphoton
isomerization was enhanced by the design of the new photoswitches.After characterizing the two-photon stimulation of LiGluR, we pursued
physiological applications that exploited the ability of this receptor
to rapidly activate neurons[37] and trigger
calcium-regulated processes.[38,39] The stimulation of
individual neurons in micrometric volumes and millisecond time scales
has been demonstrated using two-photon neurotransmitter uncaging[23] and optogenetics.[24,25] To complement
this set of tools for investigating brain connectivity, we applied
two-photon activation of LiGluR in neuronal and non-neuronal cells
of the brain using the high photocurrents provided by MAG and MAG2p. We expressed GluK2-L439C-eGFP in cultured hippocampal neurons,
incubated them in MAG2p and recorded neuronal activity
using whole-cell patch clamp (Figures 7). Excitation
of the soma with 900 nm light elicits inward currents in voltage-clamp
experiments (Figure 7c). In current-clamp mode,
these photocurrents triggered action potentials in two out of three
tested neurons (Figure 7d). Although several
properties of LiGluR-MAG2p must be improved in order to
reliably photocontrol whole neurons and individual presynaptic terminals
(lifetime of the cis isomer, receptor expression
level, and subcellular localization), these results indicate that
it is possible to activate neurons using two-photon stimulation of
synthetic photoswitchable proteins.
Figure 7
(a) Two-photon image (λ = 1000 nm)
of a cultured LiGluR-MAG2p hippocampal neuron filled with
Alexa Fluor 594. Red square
defines the raster scan area of two-photon stimulation. Scale bar
is 20 μm. (b) Voltage-clamp recording during one-photon stimulation
(blue bar). (c,d) Two-photon raster scan (gray bars) of the same neuron
during (c) voltage-clamp recording, which shows two-photon current
with a transient current spike (two-photon mean current amplitude:
21 ± 3 pA, 19 ± 2% of one-photon current, N = 3), and (d) current-clamp recording (resting potential = −45
mV). Two-photon excitation conditions: λ = 900 nm, 0.25 s scan,
and 24 mW on sample.
(a) Two-photon image (λ = 1000 nm)
of a cultured LiGluR-MAG2p hippocampal neuron filled with
Alexa Fluor 594. Red square
defines the raster scan area of two-photon stimulation. Scale bar
is 20 μm. (b) Voltage-clamp recording during one-photon stimulation
(blue bar). (c,d) Two-photon raster scan (gray bars) of the same neuron
during (c) voltage-clamp recording, which shows two-photon current
with a transient current spike (two-photon mean current amplitude:
21 ± 3 pA, 19 ± 2% of one-photon current, N = 3), and (d) current-clamp recording (resting potential = −45
mV). Two-photon excitation conditions: λ = 900 nm, 0.25 s scan,
and 24 mW on sample.In the same experimental conditions, no spikes were elicited
by
two-photon stimulation of LiGluR-MAG, probably due to the slow photoresponses
shown in Figure 5b. However, the large, step-function
photocurrents provided by MAG and the calcium permeability of GluK2[40] make LiGluR-MAG more attractive to trigger calcium-regulated
processes[39,41] including astrocyte activation[38] (see also Figure S7 in the Supporting Information). In cultured astrocytes expressing
LiGluR-MAG (Figures 8), two-photon excitation
at 820 nm triggered bistable currents (Figure 8c). Interestingly, whole-cell photocurrents can also be measured
during the stimulation of a subcellular region (Figure 8d) or a spot (Figures 8e–g),
and these responses are reversible by illuminating the cell at 500
nm (Figures 8c,d,h). In order to verify whether
such stimuli were enough to activate an intracellular calcium response
in the astrocyte,[38,42] we performed two-photon calcium
imaging together with two-photon stimulation of astrocytes expressing
LiGluR-MAG. When we stimulated an expressing astrocyte, LiGluR activation
caused a calcium increase that propagated to neighboring cells, generating
a calcium wave that expanded to astrocytes throughout the field of
view (Figure 8i–k and Movie S1 in the Supporting Information). This effect, which is
not observed when locally stimulating non-expressing astrocytes (Figure
S13 and Movie S2 in the Supporting Information), demonstrates that two-photon LiGluR activation can be used to
manipulate cytosolic calcium levels in cultured astrocytes.
Figure 8
(a) Two-photon
image (λ = 1000 nm) of a cultured LiGluR-MAG
astrocyte filled with Alexa Fluor 594. Red and blue squares define
the whole cell and subcellular raster scan areas, respectively. Locations
of point stimulations are depicted by orange dots. Scale bar is 10
μm. (b) Whole-cell voltage-clamp recording of the astrocyte
during one-photon stimulation (LiGluR opening, purple bar; LiGluR
closing, green bar). (c–h) Two-photon currents measured on
the same astrocyte (LiGluR opening, gray bar; one-photon LiGluR closing,
green bar): (c) cell scan stimulation at λ = 820 nm, 10 scans
of 0.7 s and 37 mW on sample (mean current amplitude: 60 ± 20
pA, 30 ± 10% of one-photon current, N = 2);
(d) subcellular scan stimulation at λ = 820 nm, 10 scans of
0.25 s and of 68 mW on sample (mean current amplitude: 17 ± 9
pA, N = 2); (e–g) single-point stimulation
(gray bar) at λ = 820 nm, 50 ms and 68 mW on sample (points
1 and 2 are on the cytoplasm, and point 3 is out of the cell as control);
(h) LiGluR closing at the end of the stimulation protocol (green bar).
(i–k) Two-photon calcium imaging of cultured astrocytes loaded
with Fura-2 (in purple, λ = 800 nm) overlapped with an image
of GFP fluorescence (in green, λ = 900 nm) to identify astrocytes
expressing LiGluR-MAG. Scale bar is 20 μm, except 50 μm
in (i). (j) Images at 1.55, 4.65, and 7.75 s after targeting the astrocyte
to which the arrow points in (i) with two-photon stimulation (20 targets,
16-pixel diameter, 10 ms per point at λ = 800 nm, 60 mW on sample).
(k) Recovery of intracellular calcium levels 38.75 s after stimulation.
(a) Two-photon
image (λ = 1000 nm) of a cultured LiGluR-MAG
astrocyte filled with Alexa Fluor 594. Red and blue squares define
the whole cell and subcellular raster scan areas, respectively. Locations
of point stimulations are depicted by orange dots. Scale bar is 10
μm. (b) Whole-cell voltage-clamp recording of the astrocyte
during one-photon stimulation (LiGluR opening, purple bar; LiGluR
closing, green bar). (c–h) Two-photon currents measured on
the same astrocyte (LiGluR opening, gray bar; one-photon LiGluR closing,
green bar): (c) cell scan stimulation at λ = 820 nm, 10 scans
of 0.7 s and 37 mW on sample (mean current amplitude: 60 ± 20
pA, 30 ± 10% of one-photon current, N = 2);
(d) subcellular scan stimulation at λ = 820 nm, 10 scans of
0.25 s and of 68 mW on sample (mean current amplitude: 17 ± 9
pA, N = 2); (e–g) single-point stimulation
(gray bar) at λ = 820 nm, 50 ms and 68 mW on sample (points
1 and 2 are on the cytoplasm, and point 3 is out of the cell as control);
(h) LiGluR closing at the end of the stimulation protocol (green bar).
(i–k) Two-photon calcium imaging of cultured astrocytes loaded
with Fura-2 (in purple, λ = 800 nm) overlapped with an image
of GFP fluorescence (in green, λ = 900 nm) to identify astrocytes
expressing LiGluR-MAG. Scale bar is 20 μm, except 50 μm
in (i). (j) Images at 1.55, 4.65, and 7.75 s after targeting the astrocyte
to which the arrow points in (i) with two-photon stimulation (20 targets,
16-pixel diameter, 10 ms per point at λ = 800 nm, 60 mW on sample).
(k) Recovery of intracellular calcium levels 38.75 s after stimulation.
Conclusions
We
have demonstrated the two-photon activation of azobenzene-based
photoswitches in living cells expressing the light-gated receptor
LiGluR.[26] Although a symmetrically substituted
azobenzene was reported to photoisomerize under continuous-wave NIR
excitation,[43] in general these chromophores
present low two-photon absorption cross sections.[29,30] However, synthetic PTLs like MAG[26] offer
great flexibility to adjust their photochemical properties without
altering protein function. We have rationally designed MAG derivatives
with visible absorption, fast thermal relaxation, and high two-photon
isomerization efficacy based on push–pull substitutions[31,32,44,45] and sensitization[33] of the azobenzene
photoisomerization. These modifications and the reported multiphoton
excitation conditions should be directly applicable to all azobenzene-based
bioactive ligands,[11] including intracellular
photoswitches known to penetrate into cells directly[46] or through specific ion channels,[47] and hyperpolarizing step-function photoswitchable channels like
SPARK[48] or LiGABA.[11] Our findings thus enable the use of synthetic photoswitches to manipulate
extra- and intracellular biochemical processes with the spatiotemporal
precision provided by two-photon stimulation.
Experimental
Section
Synthesis
A detailed description of the synthesis of
target photoswitchable tethered ligands is given in the Supporting Information.
Photochemical Characterization
Trans–cis isomerization of MAG2p and MAGA2p in solution
was investigated by (i) 1H NMR for the elucidation of the
photostationary-state mixtures; (ii) steady-state UV–vis absorption
spectroscopy for trans–cis photoisomerization
and slow cis–trans thermal back-isomerization
processes; and (iii) transient absorption spectroscopy for fast cis–trans thermal back-isomerization processes.
LiGluR on Cultured Cells
HEK293 tsA201 cell line, cultured
hippocampal neurons, and astrocytes plated on glass coverslips were
transfected with GluK2-L439C-eGFP. Prior to each experiment, they
were incubated with one of the PTLs to allow the chemical conjugation
with the receptor channel and light sensitization. A second incubation
with concavalin A was done in order to inhibit desensitization of
the glutamate receptor.
Electrophysiology
For two-photon
stimulation, voltage-clamp
and current-clamp recordings under whole-cell configuration were done
with an Axon Multiclamp 700B amplifier (Molecular Devices), and data
were acquired at 10 kHz. Borosilicate glass pipettes were pulled with
a typical resistance of 4–6 MΩ for HEK293 tsA201 cells
and neurons or 7–8 MΩ for astrocytes. Bath solution was
composed of 140 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl, 2.5 mM KCl, 10 mM HEPES, 2.5 mM
CaCl2, and 10–20 mM glucose to fix osmolarity to
310 mOsm·kg–1, pH 7.42 adjusted with NaOH.
For HEK293 tsA201 cell line, pipet solution contained 120 mM cesium
methanosulfonate, 10 mM TEA-Cl, 5 mM MgCl2, 3 mM Na2ATP, 1 mM Na2GTP, 20 mM HEPES, and 0.5 mM EGTA,
290 mOsm·kg–1, pH 7.2 adjusted with CsOH. For
neurons and astrocytes it consisted of 130 mM potassium gluconate,
5 mM NaCl, 10 mM HEPES, 0.1 mM EGTA, 2 mM MgSO4, 4 mM Mg-ATP,
0.4 mM NaXGTP, 7 mM Na2-phosphocreatine, 2 mM pyruvic acid,
and 0.1 mM Alexa Fluor 594 (Molecular Probes), pH 7.3 adjusted with
KOH.
Two-Photon Stimulation
All two-photon experiments were
performed in the Yuste laboratory with a custom-made two-photon laser
scanning microscope based on a modified Olympus BX50WI microscope
with a Ti:sapphire laser as light source (Coherent Chameleon Ultra
II, 140 fs pulses, 80-MHz repetition rate). Laser power was modulated
by a Pockels cell (Conoptics) and adjusted for each wavelength to
be close to 40 mW on sample for MAG2p and MAGA2p and 50 mW on sample for MAG, if not specified otherwise. In experiments
with MAG, we used a 20x/0.5-NA objective (Olympus),
and with the red-shifted compounds, we used a 20x/0.95-NA objective (Olympus) in Figures 5 and 6 and a 40x/0.8-NA objective (Olympus)
in Figures 7 and 8.
For two-photon stimulation we defined a ROI and applied a unidirectional
raster scan using FluoView software, or we performed point stimulations
with custom-written LabView Software.[49]
Calcium Imaging of Astrocytes
First, 50 μL of
DMSO was added to a 50 μg aliquot of Fura-2-AM (Life Technologies).
Next, 0.2 μL of this solution and 0.2 μL of pluronic acid
(20% in DMSO) in 2 mL supplemental media were added to the culture
dish and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min, before washing and LiGluR
conjugation with MAG and concanavalin A treatment. We raster-scanned
Fura-2 (100 frames, 1.55 s/frame) at 800 nm and 40 mW on sample with
a 20x/0.5-NA objective for recording the activity
of astrocytes and stimulated single nonexpressing or GFP-positive
astrocytes using custom written software,[49] with a protocol of 20 stimulation targets on the cell with a16-pixel
diameter, corresponding to approximately 11 μm diameter.
Data Analysis
Amplitudes of LiGluR currents were analyzed
using IgorPro (Wavemetrics), and closing time constants of LiGluR
were determined with a custom-made software using LabView. In the
two-photon action spectrum of each compound, every set of data from
one cell was normalized to the action spectrum integral from a chosen
representative before cell average. Finally, we normalized each action
spectrum to its maximum. Calcium imaging of astrocytes was analyzed
using custom written software (Caltracer) and ImageJ.
Authors: Adam M Packer; Darcy S Peterka; Jan J Hirtz; Rohit Prakash; Karl Deisseroth; Rafael Yuste Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2012-11-11 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: Yi I Wu; Daniel Frey; Oana I Lungu; Angelika Jaehrig; Ilme Schlichting; Brian Kuhlman; Klaus M Hahn Journal: Nature Date: 2009-08-19 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Shai Berlin; Stephanie Szobota; Andreas Reiner; Elizabeth C Carroll; Michael A Kienzler; Alice Guyon; Tong Xiao; Dirk Trauner; Ehud Y Isacoff Journal: Elife Date: 2016-03-01 Impact factor: 8.140
Authors: Wan-Chen Lin; Ming-Chi Tsai; Christopher M Davenport; Caleb M Smith; Julia Veit; Neil M Wilson; Hillel Adesnik; Richard H Kramer Journal: Neuron Date: 2015-11-19 Impact factor: 17.173