Literature DB >> 24856912

Variability of in vivo reference point indentation in skeletally mature inbred rats.

Matthew R Allen1, Christopher L Newman2, Eric Smith2, Drew M Brown2, Jason M Organ2.   

Abstract

Reference point indentation (RPI) has emerged as a novel tool to measure material-level biomechanical properties in vivo. Human studies have been able to differentiate fracture versus non-fracture patients while a dog study has shown the technique can differentiate drug treatment effects. The goal of this study was to extend this technology to the in vivo measurement of rats, one of the most common animal models used to study bone, with assessment of intra- and inter-animal variability. Seventy-two skeletally mature male Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to in vivo RPI on the region between the tibial diaphysis and proximal metaphysis. RPI data were assessed using a custom MATLAB program to determine several outcome parameters, including first cycle indentation distance (ID-1st), indentation distance increase (IDI), total indentation distance (TID), first cycle unloading slope (US-1st), and first cycle energy dissipation (ED-1st). Intra-animal variability ranged from 13% to 21% with US-1st and Tot Ed 1st-L being the least variable properties and IDI the most highly variable. Inter-animal variability ranged from 16% (US-1st) to 25% (ED-1st and IDI). Based on these data, group size estimates would need to range from 9 to 18/group to achieve sufficient power for detecting a 25% difference in a two-group experiment. Repeat tests on the contralateral limb of a small cohort of animals (n=17) showed non-significant differences over 28 days ranging from -6% to -18%. These results provide important data on RPI variability (intra- and inter-animal) in rats that can be used to properly power future experiments using this technique.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone material properties; Bone mechanics; Microindentation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24856912      PMCID: PMC4096655          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.04.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  10 in total

1.  Considerations for development of surrogate endpoints for antifracture efficacy of new treatments in osteoporosis: a perspective.

Authors:  Mary L Bouxsein; Pierre D Delmas
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  The bone diagnostic instrument II: indentation distance increase.

Authors:  Paul Hansma; Patricia Turner; Barney Drake; Eugene Yurtsev; Alexander Proctor; Phillip Mathews; Jason Lulejian; Jason Lelujian; Connor Randall; Jonathan Adams; Ralf Jungmann; Federico Garza-de-Leon; Georg Fantner; Haykaz Mkrtchyan; Michael Pontin; Aaron Weaver; Morton B Brown; Nadder Sahar; Ricardo Rossello; David Kohn
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.523

3.  In vivo assessment of bone quality in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Joshua N Farr; Matthew T Drake; Shreyasee Amin; L Joseph Melton; Louise K McCready; Sundeep Khosla
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Towards a standardized reference point indentation testing procedure.

Authors:  Alexander Setters; Iwona Jasiuk
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2014-01-27

5.  Reference-point indentation correlates with bone toughness assessed using whole-bone traditional mechanical testing.

Authors:  Maxime A Gallant; Drew M Brown; Jason M Organ; Matthew R Allen; David B Burr
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Microindentation for in vivo measurement of bone tissue material properties in atypical femoral fracture patients and controls.

Authors:  Roberto C Güerri-Fernández; Xavier Nogués; José M Quesada Gómez; Elisa Torres Del Pliego; Lluís Puig; Natalia García-Giralt; Guy Yoskovitz; Leonardo Mellibovsky; Paul K Hansma; Adolfo Díez-Pérez
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  In vivo reference point indentation reveals positive effects of raloxifene on mechanical properties following 6 months of treatment in skeletally mature beagle dogs.

Authors:  Mohammad Aref; Maxime A Gallant; Jason M Organ; Joseph M Wallace; Christopher L Newman; David B Burr; Drew M Brown; Matthew R Allen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 8.  The ovariectomized rat model of postmenopausal bone loss.

Authors:  D N Kalu
Journal:  Bone Miner       Date:  1991-12

9.  FDA Guidelines and animal models for osteoporosis.

Authors:  D D Thompson; H A Simmons; C M Pirie; H Z Ke
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Microindentation for in vivo measurement of bone tissue mechanical properties in humans.

Authors:  Adolfo Diez-Perez; Roberto Güerri; Xavier Nogues; Enric Cáceres; Maria Jesus Peña; Leonardo Mellibovsky; Connor Randall; Daniel Bridges; James C Weaver; Alexander Proctor; Davis Brimer; Kurt J Koester; Robert O Ritchie; Paul K Hansma
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 6.741

  10 in total
  6 in total

1.  In vivo reference point indentation measurement variability in skeletally mature inbred mice.

Authors:  Andrew Srisuwananukorn; Matthew R Allen; Drew M Brown; Joseph M Wallace; Jason M Organ
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2015-06-17

2.  Determination of Elastic Modulus in Mouse Bones Using a Nondestructive Micro-Indentation Technique Using Reference Point Indentation.

Authors:  Ganesh Thiagarajan; Mark T Begonia; Mark Dallas; Nuria Lara-Castillo; JoAnna M Scott; Mark L Johnson
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Microdamage induced by in vivo Reference Point Indentation in mice is repaired by osteocyte-apoptosis mediated remodeling.

Authors:  Oran D Kennedy; Matin Lendhey; Peter Mauer; Anaya Philip; Jelena Basta-Pljakic; Mitchell B Schaffler
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Age-related changes in the fracture resistance of male Fischer F344 rat bone.

Authors:  Sasidhar Uppuganti; Mathilde Granke; Alexander J Makowski; Mark D Does; Jeffry S Nyman
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 5.  True Gold or Pyrite: A Review of Reference Point Indentation for Assessing Bone Mechanical Properties In Vivo.

Authors:  Matthew R Allen; Erin Mb McNerny; Jason M Organ; Joseph M Wallace
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Reference point indentation is insufficient for detecting alterations in traditional mechanical properties of bone under common experimental conditions.

Authors:  John B Krege; Mohammad W Aref; Erin McNerny; Joseph M Wallace; Jason M Organ; Matthew R Allen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2016-04-09       Impact factor: 4.398

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.