Literature DB >> 18601422

The bone diagnostic instrument II: indentation distance increase.

Paul Hansma1, Patricia Turner, Barney Drake, Eugene Yurtsev, Alexander Proctor, Phillip Mathews, Jason Lulejian, Jason Lelujian, Connor Randall, Jonathan Adams, Ralf Jungmann, Federico Garza-de-Leon, Georg Fantner, Haykaz Mkrtchyan, Michael Pontin, Aaron Weaver, Morton B Brown, Nadder Sahar, Ricardo Rossello, David Kohn.   

Abstract

The bone diagnostic instrument (BDI) is being developed with the long-term goal of providing a way for researchers and clinicians to measure bone material properties of human bone in vivo. Such measurements could contribute to the overall assessment of bone fragility in the future. Here, we describe an improved BDI, the Osteoprobe IItrade mark. In the Osteoprobe IItrade mark, the probe assembly, which is designed to penetrate soft tissue, consists of a reference probe (a 22 gauge hypodermic needle) and a test probe (a small diameter, sharpened rod) which slides through the inside of the reference probe. The probe assembly is inserted through the skin to rest on the bone. The distance that the test probe is indented into the bone can be measured relative to the position of the reference probe. At this stage of development, the indentation distance increase (IDI) with repeated cycling to a fixed force appears to best distinguish bone that is more easily fractured from bone that is less easily fractured. Specifically, in three model systems, in which previous mechanical testing and/or tests reported here found degraded mechanical properties such as toughness and postyield strain, the BDI found increased IDI. However, it must be emphasized that, at this time, neither the IDI nor any other mechanical measurement by any technique has been shown clinically to correlate with fracture risk. Further, we do not yet understand the mechanism responsible for determining IDI beyond noting that it is a measure of the continuing damage that results from repeated loading. As such, it is more a measure of plasticity than elasticity in the bone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18601422      PMCID: PMC2678790          DOI: 10.1063/1.2937199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum        ISSN: 0034-6748            Impact factor:   1.523


  28 in total

1.  The role of collagen in the declining mechanical properties of aging human cortical bone.

Authors:  P Zioupos; J D Currey; A J Hamer
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1999-05

2.  Sacrificial bonds and hidden length: unraveling molecular mesostructures in tough materials.

Authors:  Georg E Fantner; Emin Oroudjev; Georg Schitter; Laura S Golde; Philipp Thurner; Marquesa M Finch; Patricia Turner; Thomas Gutsmann; Daniel E Morse; Helen Hansma; Paul K Hansma
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-12-02       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Sacrificial bonds and hidden length dissipate energy as mineralized fibrils separate during bone fracture.

Authors:  Georg E Fantner; Tue Hassenkam; Johannes H Kindt; James C Weaver; Henrik Birkedal; Leonid Pechenik; Jacqueline A Cutroni; Geraldo A G Cidade; Galen D Stucky; Daniel E Morse; Paul K Hansma
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2005-07-17       Impact factor: 43.841

4.  Cooperative deformation of mineral and collagen in bone at the nanoscale.

Authors:  Himadri S Gupta; Jong Seto; Wolfgang Wagermaier; Paul Zaslansky; Peter Boesecke; Peter Fratzl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Mechanical properties and the hierarchical structure of bone.

Authors:  J Y Rho; L Kuhn-Spearing; P Zioupos
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.242

6.  Nanoindentation discriminates the elastic properties of individual human bone lamellae under dry and physiological conditions.

Authors:  S Hengsberger; A Kulik; Ph Zysset
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Elastic properties of human cortical and trabecular lamellar bone measured by nanoindentation.

Authors:  J Y Rho; T Y Tsui; G M Pharr
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Age-related changes in the collagen network and toughness of bone.

Authors:  X Wang; X Shen; X Li; C Mauli Agrawal
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Influence of the degradation of the organic matrix on the microscopic fracture behavior of trabecular bone.

Authors:  Georg E Fantner; Henrik Birkedal; Johannes H Kindt; Tue Hassenkam; James C Weaver; Jacquelin A Cutroni; Bonnie L Bosma; Lukmaan Bawazer; Marquesa M Finch; Geraldo A G Cidade; Daniel E Morse; Galen D Stucky; Paul K Hansma
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Evidence for an elementary process in bone plasticity with an activation enthalpy of 1 eV.

Authors:  Himadri S Gupta; Peter Fratzl; Michael Kerschnitzki; Gunthard Benecke; Wolfgang Wagermaier; Helmut O K Kirchner
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2007-04-22       Impact factor: 4.118

View more
  42 in total

Review 1.  Methods for assessing bone quality: a review.

Authors:  Eve Donnelly
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Increasing fluoride content deteriorates rat bone mechanical properties.

Authors:  Taraneh Rezaee; Mary L Bouxsein; Lamya Karim
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-04-19       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Deep atomic force microscopy.

Authors:  H Barnard; B Drake; C Randall; P K Hansma
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.523

Review 4.  Measuring bone quality.

Authors:  Elisa Torres-del-Pliego; Laia Vilaplana; Roberto Güerri-Fernández; Adolfo Diez-Pérez
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.592

5.  Variability of in vivo reference point indentation in skeletally mature inbred rats.

Authors:  Matthew R Allen; Christopher L Newman; Eric Smith; Drew M Brown; Jason M Organ
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  The bone diagnostic instrument III: testing mouse femora.

Authors:  Connor Randall; Phillip Mathews; Eugene Yurtsev; Nadder Sahar; David Kohn; Paul Hansma
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.523

7.  In vivo reference point indentation measurement variability in skeletally mature inbred mice.

Authors:  Andrew Srisuwananukorn; Matthew R Allen; Drew M Brown; Joseph M Wallace; Jason M Organ
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2015-06-17

8.  Identifying Novel Clinical Surrogates to Assess Human Bone Fracture Toughness.

Authors:  Mathilde Granke; Alexander J Makowski; Sasidhar Uppuganti; Mark D Does; Jeffry S Nyman
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Applications of a New Handheld Reference Point Indentation Instrument Measuring Bone Material Strength.

Authors:  Connor Randall; Daniel Bridges; Roberto Guerri; Xavier Nogues; Lluis Puig; Elisa Torres; Leonardo Mellibovsky; Kevin Hoffseth; Tyler Stalbaum; Ananya Srikanth; James C Weaver; Sasha Rosen; Heather Barnard; Davis Brimer; Alex Proctor; James Candy; Christopher Saldana; Srinivasan Chandrasekar; Timothy Lescun; Carrie M Nielson; Eric Orwoll; Doug Herthel; Hal Kopeikin; Henry T Y Yang; Joshua N Farr; Louise McCready; Sundeep Khosla; Adolfo Diez-Perez; Paul K Hansma
Journal:  J Med Device       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 0.582

Review 10.  Determinants of bone strength and quality in diabetes mellitus in humans.

Authors:  Joshua N Farr; Sundeep Khosla
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 4.398

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.