Literature DB >> 28426462

High-resolution esophageal manometry: interpretation in clinical practice.

Rena Yadlapati1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) is the current state-of-the-art diagnostic tool to evaluate esophageal motility patterns and, as such, is widely adopted in clinical practice. This article will review the interpretation of esophageal HRM in clinical practice. RECENT
FINDINGS: HRM uses a high-resolution catheter to transmit intraluminal pressure data that are subsequently converted into dynamic esophageal pressure topography (EPT) plots. Metric data from EPT plots are synthesized to yield an esophageal motility diagnosis according to the Chicago Classification, a formal analytic scheme for esophageal motility disorders, which is currently in version 3.0. The standard HRM protocol consists of a baseline phase and a series of 10 wet swallows in the supine or reclined position. In addition, data from swallows in the seated position and provocative HRM maneuvers provide useful information about motility properties. Combined high-resolution impedance technology is also clinically available and enables concurrent assessment of bolus transit and postprandial responses. Finally, there is ongoing interest to optimize the training and competency assessment for interpretation of HRM in clinical practice.
SUMMARY: Esophageal HRM is a valuable and sophisticated clinical tool to evaluate esophageal motility patterns. Emerging clinical applications of esophageal HRM include combined impedance technology, provocative maneuvers, and postprandial evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28426462      PMCID: PMC5568812          DOI: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0267-1379            Impact factor:   3.287


  44 in total

1.  Quantifying esophageal peristalsis with high-resolution manometry: a study of 75 asymptomatic volunteers.

Authors:  Sudip K Ghosh; John E Pandolfino; Qing Zhang; Andrew Jarosz; Nimeesh Shah; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 4.052

2.  Distal contraction latency: a measure of propagation velocity optimized for esophageal pressure topography studies.

Authors:  Sabine Roman; Zhiyue Lin; John E Pandolfino; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Advanced training in neurogastroenterology and gastrointestinal motility.

Authors:  Satish S C Rao; Henry P Parkman
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Diagnosis of Esophageal Motility Disorders: Esophageal Pressure Topography vs. Conventional Line Tracing.

Authors:  Dustin A Carlson; Karthik Ravi; Peter J Kahrilas; C Prakash Gyawali; Arjan J Bredenoord; Donald O Castell; Stuart J Spechler; Magnus Halland; Navya Kanuri; David A Katzka; Cadman L Leggett; Sabine Roman; Jose B Saenz; Gregory S Sayuk; Alan C Wong; Rena Yadlapati; Jody D Ciolino; Mark R Fox; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 5.  Evaluation of esophageal motor function in clinical practice.

Authors:  C P Gyawali; A J Bredenoord; J L Conklin; M Fox; J E Pandolfino; J H Peters; S Roman; A Staiano; M F Vaezi
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 6.  Esophageal motor function: technical aspects of manometry.

Authors:  C Prakash Gyawali; Amit Patel
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2014-08-08

7.  Flow time through esophagogastric junction derived during high-resolution impedance-manometry studies: a novel parameter for assessing esophageal bolus transit.

Authors:  Zhiyue Lin; Hala Imam; Frèdèric Nicodème; Dustin A Carlson; Chen-Yuan Lin; Brandon Yim; Peter J Kahrilas; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 4.052

8.  A System to Assess the Competency for Interpretation of Esophageal Manometry Identifies Variation in Learning Curves.

Authors:  Rena Yadlapati; Rajesh N Keswani; Jody D Ciolino; David P Grande; Zoe I Listernick; Dustin A Carlson; Donald O Castell; Kerry B Dunbar; Andrew J Gawron; C Prakash Gyawali; Philip O Katz; David Katzka; Brian E Lacy; Stuart J Spechler; Roger Tatum; Marcelo F Vela; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 11.382

9.  Jackhammer esophagus: Observations on a European cohort.

Authors:  T V K Herregods; A J P M Smout; J L S Ooi; D Sifrim; A J Bredenoord
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 10.  Implementation of high-resolution manometry in the clinical practice of speech language pathology.

Authors:  Molly A Knigge; Susan Thibeault; Timothy M McCulloch
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.438

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Utility of Esophageal High-Resolution Manometry in Clinical Practice: First, Do HRM.

Authors:  Ishita Dhawan; Brendon O'Connell; Amit Patel; Ron Schey; Henry P Parkman; Frank Friedenberg
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Manometric changes of the esophagus in morbidly obese patients.

Authors:  Andrada L Popescu; Raluca S Costache; Daniel O Costache; Vasile D Balaban; Mariana Jinga; Florentina Ionita-Radu; Ana Caruntu; Carmen Fierbinteanu-Braticevici
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 3.  Esophageal Dysphagia in the Elderly.

Authors:  Megan Q Chan; Gokulakishnan Balasubramanian
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-12

Review 4.  How I Approach Dysphagia.

Authors:  Jooho P Kim; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2019-08-20

Review 5.  A Comparative Assessment of the Diagnosis of Swallowing Impairment and Gastroesophageal Reflux in Canines and Humans.

Authors:  Tarini V Ullal; Stanley L Marks; Peter C Belafsky; Jeffrey L Conklin; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-06-09

6.  Assessment of Esophageal High-Resolution Impedance Manometry in Patients with Nonobstructive Dysphagia.

Authors:  Zhaoyu Liu; Jiazhi Liao; Dean Tian; Mei Liu; Zili Dan; Qin Yu
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 2.260

7.  Laparoscopic transhiatal surgery for an epiphrenic esophageal diverticulum derived from a jackhammer esophagus: a case report.

Authors:  Atsuro Fujinaga; Tomotaka Shibata; Tsuyoshi Etoh; Kazuhiro Tada; Kosuke Suzuki; Kohei Nishiki; Katsuhiro Ogawa; Yohei Kono; Takahiro Hiratsuka; Tomonori Akagi; Yoshitake Ueda; Manabu Toujigamori; Hidefumi Shiroshita; Norio Shiraishi; Masafumi Inomata
Journal:  Surg Case Rep       Date:  2020-06-29

Review 8.  Thyroidectomy-related Swallowing Difficulties: Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Ana Đanić-Hadžibegović; Filip Hergešić; Ema Babić; Juraj Slipac; Ratko Prstačić
Journal:  Acta Clin Croat       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 0.780

9.  Salivary Pepsin as an Intrinsic Marker for Diagnosis of Sub-types of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-related Disorders.

Authors:  Yan-Jun Wang; Xiu-Qiong Lang; Dan Wu; Yu-Qin He; Chun-Hui Lan; Xiao Xiao; Bin Wang; Duo-Wu Zou; Ji-Min Wu; Yong-Bin Zhao; Peter W Dettmar; Dong-Feng Chen; Min Yang
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 4.924

10.  Esophageal Pathophysiologic Changes and Adenocarcinoma After Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Veeravich Jaruvongvanich; Reem Matar; Karthik Ravi; M Hassan Murad; Kornpong Vantanasiri; Nicha Wongjarupong; Patompong Ungprasert; Eric J Vargas; Daniel B Maselli; Larry J Prokop; Barham K Abu Dayyeh
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 4.396

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.