Literature DB >> 23565784

Cognitive control of involuntary distraction by deviant sounds.

Fabrice B R Parmentier1, Maria Hebrero.   

Abstract

It is well established that a task-irrelevant sound (deviant sound) departing from an otherwise repetitive sequence of sounds (standard sounds) elicits an involuntary capture of attention and orienting response toward the deviant stimulus, resulting in the lengthening of response times in an ongoing task. Some have argued that this type of distraction can be reduced by cognitive control when visual stimuli cue the presentation of the deviant and standard sounds. We compared this account with an alternative explanation, namely, that cues may reduce distraction because cue processing depletes attentional resources from the orienting response to the deviant sound. We report the results of an experiment in which participants judged the movement direction of sounds in the absence of cues and in conditions in which the type of sound was cued early or immediately before the sounds. We found that cues predicting the presentation of deviant sounds eliminated behavioral distraction irrespective of the time available to process them. This finding lends support to the contention that distraction by deviant sounds can be reduced through cognitive control and rule out the division of attention as an alternative explanation of our results and those from past studies. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23565784     DOI: 10.1037/a0032421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  8 in total

Review 1.  The cognitive determinants of behavioral distraction by deviant auditory stimuli: a review.

Authors:  Fabrice B R Parmentier
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-12-21

2.  Preparation interval and cue utilization in the prevention of distraction.

Authors:  János Horváth
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-08-24       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Auditory attentional capture: implicit and explicit approaches.

Authors:  Polly Dalton; Robert W Hughes
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-03-19

4.  Aging increases distraction by auditory oddballs in visual, but not auditory tasks.

Authors:  Alicia Leiva; Fabrice B R Parmentier; Pilar Andrés
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-05-23

5.  Food words distract the hungry: Evidence of involuntary semantic processing of task-irrelevant but biologically-relevant unexpected auditory words.

Authors:  Fabrice B R Parmentier; Antonia P Pacheco-Unguetti; Sara Valero
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The role of auditory transient and deviance processing in distraction of task performance: a combined behavioral and event-related brain potential study.

Authors:  Stefan Berti
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  High Working Memory Load Impairs Language Processing during a Simulated Piloting Task: An ERP and Pupillometry Study.

Authors:  Mickaël Causse; Vsevolod Peysakhovich; Eve F Fabre
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Distraction by deviant sounds: disgusting and neutral words capture attention to the same extent.

Authors:  Fabrice B R Parmentier; Isabel Fraga; Alicia Leiva; Pilar Ferré
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-05-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.