Literature DB >> 24850381

What analytic method should clinicians use to derive spine T-scores and predict incident fractures in men? Results from the MrOS study.

K E Hansen1, R D Blank, L Palermo, H A Fink, E S Orwoll.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: In this study, the area under the curve was highest when using the lowest vertebral body T-score to diagnose osteoporosis. In men for whom hip imaging is not possible, the lowest vertebral body T-score improves the ability to diagnose osteoporosis in men who are likely to have an incident fragility fracture.
INTRODUCTION: Spine T-scores have limited ability to predict fragility fracture. We hypothesized that using lowest vertebral body T-score to diagnose osteoporosis would better predict fracture.
METHODS: Among men enrolled in the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study, we identified cases with incident clinical fracture (n = 484) and controls without fracture (n = 1,516). We analyzed the lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) in cases and controls (n = 2,000) to record the L1-L4 (referent), the lowest vertebral body, and International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD)-determined T-scores using a male normative database and the L1-L4 T-score using a female normative database. We compared the ability of method to diagnose osteoporosis and, therefore, to predict incident clinical fragility fracture, using area under the receiver operator curves (AUCs) and the net reclassification index (NCI) as measures of diagnostic accuracy. ISCD-determined T-scores were determined in only 60 % of participants (n = 1,205).
RESULTS: Among 1,205 men, the AUC to predict incident clinical fracture was 0.546 for L1-L4 male, 0.542 for the L1-L4 female, 0.585 for lowest vertebral body, and 0.559 for ISCD-determined T-score. The lowest vertebral body AUC was the only method significantly different from the referent method (p = 0.002). Likewise, a diagnosis of osteoporosis based on the lowest vertebral body T-score demonstrated a significantly better net reclassification index (NRI) than the referent method (net NRI +0.077, p = 0.005). By contrast, the net NRI for other methods of analysis did not differ from the referent method.
CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that in men, the lowest vertebral body T-score is an acceptable method by which to estimate fracture risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24850381      PMCID: PMC4134992          DOI: 10.1007/s00198-014-2744-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  15 in total

1.  Interobserver reproducibility of criteria for vertebral body exclusion.

Authors:  Karen E Hansen; Neil Binkley; Rose Christian; Nellie Vallarta-Ast; Diane Krueger; Marc K Drezner; Robert D Blank
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2004-11-29       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Design and baseline characteristics of the osteoporotic fractures in men (MrOS) study--a large observational study of the determinants of fracture in older men.

Authors:  Eric Orwoll; Janet Babich Blank; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Jane Cauley; Steven Cummings; Kristine Ensrud; Cora Lewis; Peggy M Cawthon; Robert Marcus; Lynn M Marshall; Joan McGowan; Kathy Phipps; Sherry Sherman; Marcia L Stefanick; Katie Stone
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Overview of recruitment for the osteoporotic fractures in men study (MrOS).

Authors:  Janet Babich Blank; Peggy Mannen Cawthon; Mary Lou Carrion-Petersen; Loretta Harper; J Phillip Johnson; Eileen Mitson; Romelia Ramírez Delay
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  Exclusion of focal vertebral artifacts from spine bone densitometry and fracture prediction: a comparison of expert physicians, three computer algorithms, and the minimum vertebra.

Authors:  James F Tsang; William D Leslie
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  BMD and risk of hip and nonvertebral fractures in older men: a prospective study and comparison with older women.

Authors:  Steven R Cummings; Peggy M Cawthon; Kristine E Ensrud; Jane A Cauley; Howard A Fink; Eric S Orwoll
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Differences in site-specific fracture risk among older women with discordant results for osteoporosis at hip and spine: study of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Howard A Fink; Stephanie L Harrison; Brent C Taylor; Steven R Cummings; John T Schousboe; Michael A Kuskowski; Katie L Stone; Kristine E Ensrud
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2008-02-25       Impact factor: 2.617

7.  Use of lowest single lumbar spine vertebra bone mineral density T-score and other T-score approaches for diagnosing osteoporosis and relationships with vertebral fracture status.

Authors:  Peiqi Chen; Paul D Miller; Neil C Binkley; David L Kendler; Mayme Wong; Kelly Krohn
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 8.  Net reclassification indices for evaluating risk prediction instruments: a critical review.

Authors:  Kathleen F Kerr; Zheyu Wang; Holly Janes; Robyn L McClelland; Bruce M Psaty; Margaret S Pepe
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.822

9.  Comparison of T-scores from different skeletal sites in differentiating postmenopausal women with and without prevalent vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Tamara J Vokes; Daniel L Gillen; Jeanne Lovett; Murray J Favus
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  Use of the lowest vertebral body T-score to diagnose lumbar osteoporosis in men: is "cherry picking" appropriate?

Authors:  Karen E Hansen; Nellie Vallarta-Ast; Diane Krueger; Ron Gangnon; Marc K Drezner; Neil Binkley
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  1 in total

1.  Older Women who are Overweight or Obese Have Vertebral Abnormalities, Partially Degraded TBS, and BMD that Worsen with Weight Loss.

Authors:  Julia Amariti; Brandon D McGuire; Anna R Ogilvie; Kristen M Beavers; Karen E Hansen; Yvette Schlussel; Michael P Walkup; Sue A Shapses
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 4.000

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.