Literature DB >> 16995809

BMD and risk of hip and nonvertebral fractures in older men: a prospective study and comparison with older women.

Steven R Cummings1, Peggy M Cawthon, Kristine E Ensrud, Jane A Cauley, Howard A Fink, Eric S Orwoll.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: In a prospective study of 5384 older men, hip BMD was a very strong predictor of hip fracture, much stronger than spine BMD. The relationship between hip BMD and hip fracture risk seemed to be stronger than observed in a large prospective study of women. Hip BMD is an excellent test for predicting fracture risk in men.
INTRODUCTION: There have been few studies of the relationship between BMD and risk of fractures in men and none for the association between lumbar spine BMD and risk of hip and nonvertebral fractures. There is also controversy about whether the associations between BMD and risk of fracture are the same in men and women.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We measured proximal femur and lumbar spine BMD in 5384 men, 5384 men, >or= 65 years of age. We compared the results to the very similar cohort of 7871 women >or=65 of age. During 4.4 years of 99% complete follow-up, we validated 317 nonvertebral (59 hip) fractures in men and 1169 nonvertebral (208 hip) fractures in women.
RESULTS: Total hip BMD was very strongly associated with risk hip fracture in men (3.2-fold increased risk per sex-specific SD decrease in BMD; 95% CI, 2.4-4.1). The association was stronger than observed in SOF (2.1; 95% CI, 1.8, 2.4; p < 0.001 for interaction). Among the men, lumbar spine BMD was weakly associated with risk of hip fracture (relative risk [RR] per sex-specific SD decrease in BMD: 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2, 2.0). The association between total hip BMD and risk of nonvertebral fractures was somewhat stronger for men (RR = 1.6; 95% CI, 1.5, 1.8) than found for women (p = 0.01 for interaction). The risk of nonvertebral fracture was substantially higher in women than in men for all T scores of hip BMD, regardless of whether sex-specific or female reference values were used.
CONCLUSIONS: Hip BMD is strongly associated with risk of nonvertebral, and especially hip fracture, in older men. These associations are at least as strong as in women. As in women, lumbar spine BMD in men is only weakly associated with risk of hip fracture. Regardless of whether sex-specific or female reference values were used, T scores indicated different risks of fractures in men than in women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16995809     DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.060708

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  99 in total

1.  American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: executive summary of recommendations.

Authors:  Nelson B Watts; John P Bilezikian; Pauline M Camacho; Susan L Greenspan; Steven T Harris; Stephen F Hodgson; Michael Kleerekoper; Marjorie M Luckey; Michael R McClung; Rachel Pessah Pollack; Steven M Petak
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  Responder analysis of the effects of denosumab on bone mineral density in men receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  R B Egerdie; F Saad; M R Smith; T L J Tammela; J Heracek; P Sieber; C Ke; B Leder; R Dansey; C Goessl
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.554

3.  Change in hip bone mineral density and risk of subsequent fractures in older men.

Authors:  Peggy M Cawthon; Susan K Ewing; Dawn C Mackey; Howard A Fink; Steven R Cummings; Kristine E Ensrud; Marcia L Stefanick; Doug C Bauer; Jane A Cauley; Eric S Orwoll
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 4.  Bone Density Screening and Re-screening in Postmenopausal Women and Older Men.

Authors:  Margaret L Gourlay; Robert A Overman; Kristine E Ensrud
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  Gendered Innovations in Orthopaedic Science: Sex, Lies, and Stereotype: In Praise of the Systematic Review.

Authors:  Amy L Ladd
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  The pathogenesis, treatment and prevention of osteoporosis in men.

Authors:  Leif Mosekilde; Peter Vestergaard; Lars Rejnmark
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Accelerated Bone Loss in Older Men: Effects on Bone Microarchitecture and Strength.

Authors:  Jane A Cauley; Andrew J Burghardt; Stephanie L Harrison; Peggy M Cawthon; Ann V Schwartz; Elizabeth Barrett Connor; Kristine E Ensrud; Lisa Langsetmo; Sharmila Majumdar; Eric Orwoll
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 8.  Osteoporosis in men.

Authors:  Sundeep Khosla; Shreyasee Amin; Eric Orwoll
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 19.871

9.  Using Radon transform of standard radiographs of the hip to differentiate between post-menopausal women with and without fracture of the proximal femur.

Authors:  H F Boehm; J Lutz; M Körner; W Mutschler; M Reiser; K-J Pfeifer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  Update in male osteoporosis.

Authors:  Sundeep Khosla
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.958

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.