Literature DB >> 15618597

Use of the lowest vertebral body T-score to diagnose lumbar osteoporosis in men: is "cherry picking" appropriate?

Karen E Hansen1, Nellie Vallarta-Ast, Diane Krueger, Ron Gangnon, Marc K Drezner, Neil Binkley.   

Abstract

In this study, we hypothesized that use of the lowest T-score among four lumbar vertebral bodies would lessen the impact of degenerative arthritis and other artifacts on diagnostic categorization at this site and increase study sensitivity, classifying more men with prior fracture as osteoporotic than the other two methods of lumbar spine analysis. Bone density studies of 533 male veterans measured between January and October 2002 were reviewed to determine diagnostic classification using the L1-L4 average, International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD)-determined, and lowest lumbar vertebral body T-score. We calculated sensitivity and specificity of the three methods of spine analysis, using spine osteoporosis to indicate a positive test and prior fracture as the true indicator of osteoporosis. The lowest lumbar T-score performed with similar sensitivity and specificity to that of the lowest hip or wrist T-score in the ability to classify men with prior fracture as osteoporotic, whereas the average L1-L4 and ISCD-determined T-scores performed with lower sensitivity, but better specificity. In conclusion, this retrospective study suggests that use of the lowest vertebral body T-score among men increases diagnostic sensitivity of lumbar spine bone mass measurement. Prospective studies are needed to determine which of these three methods of lumbar spine analysis best predicts future fragility fracture in men and women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15618597     DOI: 10.1385/jcd:7:4:376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.963


  3 in total

1.  Patient variables impact lumbar spine dual energy X-ray absorptiometry precision.

Authors:  R D Blank; D G Malone; R C Christian; N L Vallarta-Ast; D C Krueger; M K Drezner; N C Binkley; K E Hansen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  What analytic method should clinicians use to derive spine T-scores and predict incident fractures in men? Results from the MrOS study.

Authors:  K E Hansen; R D Blank; L Palermo; H A Fink; E S Orwoll
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Bone Mineral Density Estimations From Routine Multidetector Computed Tomography: A Comparative Study of Contrast and Calibration Effects.

Authors:  Johannes Kaesmacher; Hans Liebl; Thomas Baum; Jan Stefan Kirschke
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2017 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.