INTRODUCTION: Patients who require laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) removal are often converted to sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). The relative safety of these salvage bariatric procedures is unclear. We hypothesized that LAGB removal with conversion to SG (BSG) or RYGB (BRYGB) would be associated with higher morbidity and mortality compared to primary SG or RYGB. METHODS: National Surgical Quality Improvement Project data (2005-2011) were analyzed. Patients undergoing SG, RYGB, BRYGB, and BSG were identified. The incidence of major complications, as well as mortality was compared between groups. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify patient factors and operation types associated with major complications or mortality. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) with p value <0.05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 51,609 patients were analyzed, consisting of primary RYGB (n = 46,153), BRYGB (495), primary SG (n = 4,831), and BSG (n = 130) patients. All groups had similar mean age (45 ± 11-years old). Salvage patients were more commonly female (89 vs. 79 %) and with lower body-mass index than primary bariatric patients (BMI 42 ± 8 vs. 46 ± 8 kg/m2). Major complication rates were 5.23 % (RYGB), 4.65 % (BRYGB), 3.95 % (SG) and 6.92 % (BSG), with 30-day mortality of 0.16 % (RYGB), 0.20 % (BRYGB), 0.08 % (SG) and 0.77 % (BSG). Multivariate analysis showed that compared to SG, RYGB, and BSG were independent predictors of major complications. Multivariate analysis of mortality showed BSG was an independent predictor of mortality compared to SG (OR 8.02, 95 % CI 1.08-59.34, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Band removal with conversion to RYGB is not associated with higher morbidity or mortality compared to primary RYGB. However, band removal with conversion to sleeve gastrectomy appears to be independently associated with a higher rate of major complications and mortality, and thus may not be the salvage procedure of choice.
INTRODUCTION:Patients who require laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) removal are often converted to sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). The relative safety of these salvage bariatric procedures is unclear. We hypothesized that LAGB removal with conversion to SG (BSG) or RYGB (BRYGB) would be associated with higher morbidity and mortality compared to primary SG or RYGB. METHODS: National Surgical Quality Improvement Project data (2005-2011) were analyzed. Patients undergoing SG, RYGB, BRYGB, and BSG were identified. The incidence of major complications, as well as mortality was compared between groups. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify patient factors and operation types associated with major complications or mortality. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) with p value <0.05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 51,609 patients were analyzed, consisting of primary RYGB (n = 46,153), BRYGB (495), primary SG (n = 4,831), and BSG (n = 130) patients. All groups had similar mean age (45 ± 11-years old). Salvage patients were more commonly female (89 vs. 79 %) and with lower body-mass index than primary bariatric patients (BMI 42 ± 8 vs. 46 ± 8 kg/m2). Major complication rates were 5.23 % (RYGB), 4.65 % (BRYGB), 3.95 % (SG) and 6.92 % (BSG), with 30-day mortality of 0.16 % (RYGB), 0.20 % (BRYGB), 0.08 % (SG) and 0.77 % (BSG). Multivariate analysis showed that compared to SG, RYGB, and BSG were independent predictors of major complications. Multivariate analysis of mortality showed BSG was an independent predictor of mortality compared to SG (OR 8.02, 95 % CI 1.08-59.34, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Band removal with conversion to RYGB is not associated with higher morbidity or mortality compared to primary RYGB. However, band removal with conversion to sleeve gastrectomy appears to be independently associated with a higher rate of major complications and mortality, and thus may not be the salvage procedure of choice.
Authors: Matthew M Hutter; Bruce D Schirmer; Daniel B Jones; Clifford Y Ko; Mark E Cohen; Ryan P Merkow; Ninh T Nguyen Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Bendix R Slegtenhorst; Erwin van der Harst; Ahmet Demirkiran; Joyce de Korte; Lodewijk J Schelfhout; Rene A Klaassen Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2012-03-07 Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: Edo O Aarts; Kemal Dogan; Parweez Koehestanie; Ignace M C Janssen; Frits J Berends Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2013-10-25 Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: Kamran Samakar; Travis J McKenzie; James Kaberna; Ali Tavakkoli; Ashley H Vernon; Arin L Madenci; Scott A Shikora; Malcolm K Robinson Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2016-04-29 Impact factor: 4.584