Literature DB >> 21937286

Conversion of failed gastric banding into four different bariatric procedures.

Samir Abu-Gazala1, Andrei Keidar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The most common bariatric operation in Europe, laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB), is reported to have a high incidence of long-term complications. Also, insufficient weight loss is reported. The optimal conversion technique is unknown. Our objective was to report our experience in the conversions of failed laparoscopic gastric banding procedures to 4 different bariatric procedures at a university hospital.
METHODS: From March 2006 to December 2010, 630 bariatric operations were performed. Of these patients, 45 underwent conversion of failed LAGB (n = 38) and nonadjustable gastric banding (n = 7). Using a prospectively collected database, we analyzed these procedures.
RESULTS: The 45 patients underwent laparoscopic conversion of failed LAGB (n = 38) and nonadjustable gastric banding (n = 7) to 4 different procedures. Of the 45 patients, 18 underwent conversion to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, 18 to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, 7 to laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch, and 2 to laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion. All conversions but 1 were completed laparoscopically. The mean operating time and hospital stay for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch, and biliopancreatic diversion was 111 ± 28 minutes and 4.3 ± 1.4 days, 195 ± 59 minutes and 3.9 ± 1.5 days, 248 ± 113 minutes, and 5.9 ± 2.6 days, and 203 minutes and 6.5 days, respectively. No patient died. Perioperative complications occurred in 4 patients (9.8%). The mean body mass index decreased from 41.5 ± 8 kg/m(2) to 31.3 ± 6.8 kg/m(2) during a mean follow-up period of 13.7 ± 9.6 months. Although laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with and without duodenal switch had the greatest preoperative body mass index, they achieved the greatest excess weight loss.
CONCLUSION: Conversion of LAGB or nonadjustable gastric banding to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with or without duodenal switch is feasible and effective to treat the complications of LAGB and to further reduce the weight of morbidly obese patients.
Copyright © 2012 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21937286     DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2011.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis        ISSN: 1550-7289            Impact factor:   4.734


  11 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as revisional procedure after adjustable gastric band--a systematic review.

Authors:  Usha K Coblijn; Caroline J Verveld; Bart A van Wagensveld; Sjoerd M Lagarde
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Revisional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass following failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.

Authors:  N A Jennings; M Boyle; K Mahawar; S Balupuri; P K Small
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Band removal and conversion to sleeve or bypass: are they equally safe?

Authors:  B Fernando Santos; Jessica B Wallaert; Thadeus L Trus
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Two stages conversion of failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding to laparoscopic roux-en-y gastric bypass. A study of one hundred patients.

Authors:  Sergio Carandina; Malek Tabbara; Manuela Bossi; Nada Helmy; Claude Polliand; Christophe Barrat
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Clinical Outcomes of Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass After Failed Adjustable Gastric Banding.

Authors:  Chang Wu; Fu-Gang Wang; Wen-Mao Yan; Ming Yan; Mao-Min Song
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy as Revisional Procedures after Adjustable Gastric Band: 5-Year Outcomes.

Authors:  Luigi Angrisani; Antonio Vitiello; Antonella Santonicola; Ariola Hasani; Maurizio De Luca; Paola Iovino
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 7.  Reoperative Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review of the Reasons for Surgery, Medical and Weight Loss Outcomes, Relevant Behavioral Factors.

Authors:  Ana Pinto-Bastos; Eva M Conceição; Paulo P P Machado
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Revision Procedures After Failed Adjustable Gastric Banding: Comparison of Efficacy and Safety.

Authors:  Pawan Chansaenroj; Lwin Aung; Wei-Jei Lee; Shu Chun Chen; Jung-Chien Chen; Kong-Han Ser
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG)-a good bariatric option for failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB): a review of 90 patients.

Authors:  Thierry Yazbek; Nagi Safa; Ronald Denis; Henri Atlas; Pierre Y Garneau
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 10.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes After Revisional Bariatric Surgery Following a Failed Adjustable Gastric Band.

Authors:  Alistair J Sharples; Vasileios Charalampakis; Markos Daskalakis; Abd A Tahrani; Rishi Singhal
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.