Literature DB >> 28526961

Simultaneous conversion of gastric band to sleeve gastrectomy is associated with increased postoperative complications: an analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Zachary C Dietch1, Bruce D Schirmer2, Peter T Hallowell2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has gained popularity for the treatment of morbid obesity as gastric banding (BAND) has fallen out of favor. As a result, simultaneous conversion (CONV) of BAND to LSG is commonly performed. We hypothesized that CONV is associated with higher 30-day risk-adjusted serious morbidity.
METHODS: Preoperative characteristics and 30-day outcomes from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant Use Files 2010-2014 were selected for patients who underwent LSG. Patients undergoing CONV were identified. Descriptive comparisons were performed using Chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests as appropriate. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to assess the association between CONV and a composite measure of 30-day serious morbidity and mortality.
RESULTS: Overall, 35,307 patients met criteria for inclusion, of which 943 (2.7%) underwent CONV. The median age of patients undergoing CONV was higher (46 vs 44 years, p < 0.001) and a greater percentage of CONV patients was female (84.8 vs 77.9%, p < 0.001) than LSG patients. CONV patients had lower rates of common comorbidities, including diabetes (14.9 vs 23.1%, p < 0.001), hypertension (41.9 vs 48.6%, p < 0.001), and tobacco use (7.2 vs 9.8%, p < 0.001), as well as lower median BMI (41 vs 44, p < 0.001). Individual unadjusted outcomes of serious 30-day complications were similar between both groups, as was a composite measure of serious morbidity (CONV 4.3% vs LSG 3.6%, p = 0.1). However, after controlling for demographics, comorbidities, and concurrent band removal, CONV was associated with increased odds of serious 30-day morbidity (1.44, 95% CI 1.03-1.97) (c-statistic: 0.60).
CONCLUSIONS: Serious morbidity following LSG is uncommon; however, CONV is associated with a modest increase in risk-adjusted adverse 30-day outcomes. Patients being evaluated for CONV should be counseled about the added risks versus LSG alone. Further research is warranted to identify whether the incremental risks of CONV may be modifiable.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bariatric surgery; Gastric band; Morbid obesity; Sleeve gastrectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28526961     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5591-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  14 in total

1.  Is a one-step sleeve gastrectomy indicated as a revision procedure after gastric banding? Data analysis from a quality assurance study of the surgical treatment of obesity in Germany.

Authors:  Christine Stroh; D Benedix; R Weiner; F Benedix; S Wolff; C Knoll; T Manger
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  Mira Shiloach; Stanley K Frencher; Janet E Steeger; Katherine S Rowell; Kristine Bartzokis; Majed G Tomeh; Karen E Richards; Clifford Y Ko; Bruce L Hall
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-11-22       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Safety of one-step conversion of gastric band to sleeve: a comparative analysis of ACS-NSQIP data.

Authors:  Ali Aminian; Saeed Shoar; Zhamak Khorgami; Toms Augustin; Philip R Schauer; Stacy A Brethauer
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 4.734

4.  Bariatric Surgery Worldwide 2013.

Authors:  L Angrisani; A Santonicola; P Iovino; G Formisano; H Buchwald; N Scopinaro
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  High failure rate of the laparoscopic-adjustable gastric band as a primary bariatric procedure.

Authors:  Tammy Kindel; Emily Martin; Eric Hungness; Alex Nagle
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 4.734

6.  Band removal and conversion to sleeve or bypass: are they equally safe?

Authors:  B Fernando Santos; Jessica B Wallaert; Thadeus L Trus
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons.

Authors:  Karl Y Bilimoria; Yaoming Liu; Jennifer L Paruch; Lynn Zhou; Thomas E Kmiecik; Clifford Y Ko; Mark E Cohen
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 8.  Safety and Outcome of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Following Removal of Adjustable Gastric Banding: Lessons from 109 Patients in a Single Center and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Niv Pencovich; Guy Lahat; Orit Goldray; Subhi Abu-Abeid; Joseph M Klausner; Shai Meron Eldar
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Single-stage versus 2-stage sleeve gastrectomy as a conversion after failed adjustable gastric banding: 30-day outcomes.

Authors:  Nabeel R Obeid; Bradley F Schwack; Marina S Kurian; Christine J Ren-Fielding; George A Fielding
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  5-year outcomes of 1-stage gastric band removal and sleeve gastrectomy.

Authors:  Aayed R Alqahtani; Mohamed O Elahmedi; Awadh R Al Qahtani; Ahmad Yousefan; Ahmed R Al-Zuhair
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 4.734

View more
  1 in total

1.  Outcomes of primary sleeve gastrectomy versus conversion sleeve gastrectomy in morbidly obese patients.

Authors:  Jong Seob Park; Sang-Moon Han
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 1.859

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.