Literature DB >> 24462304

What happens after gastric band removal without additional bariatric surgery?

Edo O Aarts1, Kemal Dogan2, Parweez Koehestanie2, Ignace M C Janssen2, Frits J Berends2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) is widely used for the treatment of morbid obesity. Many patients benefit from this procedure initially, but experience complications after a few years. The treatment for many complications is revisional bariatric surgery. A number of patients, however, request only band removal without secondary bariatric surgery. The aim of this study was to assess the perioperative and medium term outcomes of patients who had their LAGB removed without secondary bariatric surgery.
METHODS: Patients were retrospectively selected using a prospectively collected database. The LAGB had to be in situ for at least 1 year, and minimum postoperative follow-up had to be 12 months.
RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients who had their LAGB laparoscopically removed between 2000 and 2010 were included. Median follow-up after LAGB removal was 3.0 (1.4 to 8.9) years. Only 2 complications (5%) and no mortality occurred perioperatively. In the 21 patients who did not undergo additional bariatric surgery, the median excess weight loss (EWL) decreased from 41% (-12% to -100%) at band removal to 9% (-10% to 90%), 0% (-20% to 78%), and -11% (-12% to 56%) after 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively. Percentage weight loss (%WL) was 17% (-54% to -5%), 4% (-47% to -9%), 0% (-41% to 11%), and -5% (-29% to 9%) after these same time intervals, respectively. After a median 2.1 (.5 to 9.9) years, 17 patients underwent either a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (14 patients) or a Scopinaro (3 patients) all because of weight regain. The current EWL and %WL in these patients is 67% (24% to 113%) and 30% (12% to 53%), respectively compared with -11% (-33% to 57%) and -4% (-14% to 34%) in patients without a secondary bariatric procedure (P< .001).
CONCLUSION: Patients who have their LAGB removed are guaranteed to suffer from weight regain. It is inadvisable to only remove the LAGB without performing an additional bariatric procedure when deemed technically feasible and safe. In this study, no patient was able to maintain the weight loss achieved with the LAGB after its removal.
© 2013 American Society for Bariatric Surgery Published by American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Gastric band; LAGB; Removal; Revisional surgery; Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24462304     DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2013.10.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis        ISSN: 1550-7289            Impact factor:   4.734


  17 in total

Review 1.  Revisional Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Systematic Review of Comparative Outcomes with Respective Primary Procedures.

Authors:  Kamal K Mahawar; Yitka Graham; William R J Carr; Neil Jennings; Norbert Schroeder; Shlok Balupuri; Peter K Small
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Outcomes After Laparoscopic Conversion of Failed Adjustable Gastric Banding (LAGB) to Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) or Single Anastomosis Duodenal Switch (SADS).

Authors:  Sarah Pearlstein; Sarah A Sabrudin; Ali Shayesteh; Eric R Tecce; Mitchell Roslin
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Band removal and conversion to sleeve or bypass: are they equally safe?

Authors:  B Fernando Santos; Jessica B Wallaert; Thadeus L Trus
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  [Redo intervention and complication management in bariatric surgery].

Authors:  T Hasenberg; M Niedergethmann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Clinical Outcomes of Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass After Failed Adjustable Gastric Banding.

Authors:  Chang Wu; Fu-Gang Wang; Wen-Mao Yan; Ming Yan; Mao-Min Song
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 6.  The use of adjustable gastric bands for management of severe and complex obesity.

Authors:  James C A Hopkins; Jane M Blazeby; Chris A Rogers; Richard Welbourn
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 4.291

7.  Safety and efficacy of single-stage conversion of failed adjustable gastric band to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a case-control study.

Authors:  Kamran Samakar; Travis J McKenzie; James Kaberna; Ali Tavakkoli; Ashley H Vernon; Arin L Madenci; Scott A Shikora; Malcolm K Robinson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Re-operations after Secondary Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alexandr Kuzminov; Andrew J Palmer; Stephen Wilkinson; Bekkhan Khatsiev; Alison J Venn
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Management of Slipped Gastric Bands via Creation of a De Novo Tunnel and Band Replacement: a Single-Centre Experience.

Authors:  Roshani Vijaykumar Patel; Patrick Woodburn; James R A Skipworth; William James Buchanan Smellie
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  Revision Procedures After Failed Adjustable Gastric Banding: Comparison of Efficacy and Safety.

Authors:  Pawan Chansaenroj; Lwin Aung; Wei-Jei Lee; Shu Chun Chen; Jung-Chien Chen; Kong-Han Ser
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.