| Literature DB >> 24846292 |
Takashi Eguchi1, Akihiko Yoshizawa2, Satoshi Kawakami3, Hirotaka Kumeda1, Tetsuya Umesaki1, Hiroyuki Agatsuma1, Takao Sakaizawa1, Yoshiaki Tominaga1, Masayuki Toishi1, Masahiro Hashizume1, Takayuki Shiina1, Kazuo Yoshida1, Shiho Asaka2, Mina Matsushita3, Tomonobu Koizumi4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Pulmonary ground-glass nodules (GGNs) are occasionally diagnosed as invasive adenocarcinomas. This study aimed to evaluate the clinicopathological features of patients with pulmonary GGNs to identify factors predictive of pathological invasion.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24846292 PMCID: PMC4028326 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097867
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Patient characteristics and tumor properties.
| Total (n = 103) | AIS (n = 47) | MIA (n = 30) | I- ADC (n = 24) | p value | |
| Age (years) | 64.3±9.7 | 63±10.8 | 64.3±9.2 | 66.3±8 | 0.3953 |
| Sex (male/female) | 39/62 | 19/28 | 14/16 | 6/18 | 0.5983 |
| Smoking history (with/without) | 31/70 | 15/32 | 13/17 | 3/21 | 0.1976 |
| CEA level (ng/ml) | 2.1±1.7 | 1.8±0.9 | 2.6±2.6 | 2.1±1.1 | 0.1408 |
| Tumor size (mm) | 13.1±5.5 | 11±3.6 | 14.7±7.6 | 15.5±3.6 |
|
| CT attenuation (HU) | −621±86.3 | −649.8±88.4 | −625.8±88.4 | −560.2±69.3 | < |
Abbreviations: AIS, adenocarcinoma in situ; MIA, minimally invasive adenocarcinoma; I-ADC, invasive adenocarcinoma; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CT, computed tomography; HU, Hounsfield unit.
significantly higher than tumor size in the AIS group.
*significantly higher than CT attenuation in the AIS and MIA groups.
Figure 1Representative radiological and histological images.
(a) A 64-year-old female patient with adenocarcinoma in situ. (i) Computed tomography (CT) scan (lung window setting) showed a pure ground-glass nodule (GGN), 11.9 mm in size. The mean CT attenuation of the tumor was −716 Hounsfield units (HU). (ii) Mediastinal window setting CT showed no tumor components except for vessels. (iii) Low magnification image (hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining) showed a circumscribed tumor growing purely with a lepidic pattern without foci of invasion. A slight thickening of the alveolar walls in the tumor area was observed. (iv) Middle magnification image of the tumor (HE staining) revealed that tumor cells appeared to replace normal pneumocytes on alveolar walls. (b) A 63-year-old female patient with minimally invasive adenocarcinoma. (i) Lung window CT image showed a pure GGN, 14.2 mm in size. The mean CT attenuation was −691 HU. (ii) Mediastinal window CT showed no tumor components. (iii) Low magnification image of the tumor (HE staining) revealed a subpleural tumor consisting predominantly of lepidic growth with a small (<5 mm) focus of invasion. (iv) Middle magnification image of the invasive area of the tumor (HE staining) revealed acinar-type growth pattern. (c) A 74-year-old female patient with lepidic-predominant invasive adenocarcinoma. (i) Lung window CT showed a pure GGN, 19.7 mm in size. The mean CT attenuation was −618 HU. (ii) Mediastinal window CT showed no tumor components except for vessels. (iii) Low magnification image (HE staining) revealed a tumor consisting mostly of lepidic growth with a smaller area (8 mm) of acinar invasion. (iv) Middle magnification image of the invasion area of the tumor (HE staining) revealed acinar gland proliferation in the fibrous stroma. (d) A 76-year-old male patient with papillary-predominant invasive adenocarcinoma. (i) Lung window CT image showed a pure GGN, 10.7 mm in size. The mean CT attenuation was −509 HU. (ii) Mediastinal window CT showed no tumor components. (iii) Low magnification image of the tumor (HE staining) revealed that the tumor predominantly consisted of papillary proliferation. (iv) Middle magnification image of the tumor (HE staining) revealed cuboidal tumor cells growing along fibrovascular cores in a papillary configuration.
Figure 2Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for invasive adenocarcinoma prediction: tumor size and computed tomography attenuation.
The sensitivity and specificity of tumor size for predicting invasive adenocarcinoma were 95.8% and 46.8%, respectively, at a cutoff value of 11.0 mm, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.75 (green curve). The sensitivity and specificity of the mean computed tomography (CT) attenuation were 95.8% and 35.1%, respectively, at a cutoff value of –680 HU, with an AUC of 0.77 (yellow curve). The sensitivity and specificity of the combined variable (tumor size and mean CT attenuation) were 91.7% and 71.4%, respectively, at cutoff values of 11 mm and −680 HU, with an AUC of 0.82 (blue curve).