Bo-Wei Zhang1, Yu Zhang2, Jian-Ding Ye2, Jin-Wei Qiang1. 1. Department of Radiology, Jinshan Hospital & Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. 2. Department of Radiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is a major cause of death, and adenocarcinoma is the most common histologic subtype. Precise diagnosis and treatment of invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC) can substantially improve the survival of patients. However, early-stage adenocarcinomas frequently appear as subsolid nodules (SSN) on computed tomography (CT), and the optimal cut-off CT value for differentiating the invasiveness of SSNs in emphysematous patients is unclear. METHODS: High-resolution CT targeted scans of 187 pulmonary SSNs in 175 patients with emphysema as confirmed by surgery and histology were retrospectively reviewed. The mean CT value, the relative CT (rCT) values of 1 (nodule CT value - lung CT value), and 2 (nodule CT value/lung CT value), and the size of the SSNs were measured and calculated. The differentiating performance of the CT values between pre-invasive and invasive tumors was evaluated using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: Significant differences were found in the rCT values of 1 and 2 among pure ground-glass nodules (GGNs) with different levels of invasiveness, in the rCT values of 1 and 2 for the ground-glass component (GGC) and the mean CT value of the solid component (SC) of part-solid nodules (PSNs) between minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) and IAC (all P<<0.05). The size was significantly different among pure GGNs with different invasiveness (P<0.05). The cut-off rCT values of 1, 2 and nodule size for differentiating between pre-invasive and invasive pure GGNs were 293.82 [sensitivity 58.0%, specificity 94.7%; area under the curve (AUC) 0.783], 0.68 (sensitivity 89.5%, specificity 58.0%, AUC 0.742) and 1.10 cm (sensitivity 74.0%, specificity 79.0%, AUC 0.796), respectively. The AUCs of combining rCT values 1 and 2 with the size of nodule were 0.795 (sensitivity 62.5%, specificity 89.5%) and 0.845 (sensitivity 71.6%, specificity 89.5%) respectively. There were no significant differences in the mean CT values between pure GGNs with different levels of invasiveness and between the GGC of PSNs of MIA and IAC. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with emphysema, the rCT values are more useful than the mean CT values for differentiating between SSNs with different invasiveness and can be valuable for patient management. 2021 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is a major cause of death, and adenocarcinoma is the most common histologic subtype. Precise diagnosis and treatment of invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC) can substantially improve the survival of patients. However, early-stage adenocarcinomas frequently appear as subsolid nodules (SSN) on computed tomography (CT), and the optimal cut-off CT value for differentiating the invasiveness of SSNs in emphysematous patients is unclear. METHODS: High-resolution CT targeted scans of 187 pulmonary SSNs in 175 patients with emphysema as confirmed by surgery and histology were retrospectively reviewed. The mean CT value, the relative CT (rCT) values of 1 (nodule CT value - lung CT value), and 2 (nodule CT value/lung CT value), and the size of the SSNs were measured and calculated. The differentiating performance of the CT values between pre-invasive and invasive tumors was evaluated using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: Significant differences were found in the rCT values of 1 and 2 among pure ground-glass nodules (GGNs) with different levels of invasiveness, in the rCT values of 1 and 2 for the ground-glass component (GGC) and the mean CT value of the solid component (SC) of part-solid nodules (PSNs) between minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) and IAC (all P<<0.05). The size was significantly different among pure GGNs with different invasiveness (P<0.05). The cut-off rCT values of 1, 2 and nodule size for differentiating between pre-invasive and invasive pure GGNs were 293.82 [sensitivity 58.0%, specificity 94.7%; area under the curve (AUC) 0.783], 0.68 (sensitivity 89.5%, specificity 58.0%, AUC 0.742) and 1.10 cm (sensitivity 74.0%, specificity 79.0%, AUC 0.796), respectively. The AUCs of combining rCT values 1 and 2 with the size of nodule were 0.795 (sensitivity 62.5%, specificity 89.5%) and 0.845 (sensitivity 71.6%, specificity 89.5%) respectively. There were no significant differences in the mean CT values between pure GGNs with different levels of invasiveness and between the GGC of PSNs of MIA and IAC. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with emphysema, the rCT values are more useful than the mean CT values for differentiating between SSNs with different invasiveness and can be valuable for patient management. 2021 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
Authors: David M Hansell; Alexander A Bankier; Heber MacMahon; Theresa C McLoud; Nestor L Müller; Jacques Remy Journal: Radiology Date: 2008-01-14 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Thibaud P Coroller; Patrick Grossmann; Ying Hou; Emmanuel Rios Velazquez; Ralph T H Leijenaar; Gretchen Hermann; Philippe Lambin; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Raymond H Mak; Hugo J W L Aerts Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2015-03-04 Impact factor: 6.280