Literature DB >> 21663997

Efficacy of CT screening for lung cancer in never-smokers: analysis of Japanese cases detected using a low-dose CT screen.

Ryoichi Kondo1, Kazuo Yoshida, Satoshi Kawakami, Takayuki Shiina, Makoto Kurai, Keiichiro Takasuna, Hiroshi Yamamoto, Tomonori Koizumi, Takayuki Honda, Keishi Kubo.   

Abstract

CT-screening for lung cancer is fairly widely used for both smokers and never-smokers in East Asia because the mortality rate for never-smokers due to this cancer is relatively high in this region. We performed comparative analyses, as a retrospective study, on three lung cancer arms detected by CT-screen, X-ray-screen, and via analysis of clinicopathological features and outcomes in never-smokers from a symptomatic-prompted group of patients. The total study cohort comprised 218 patients in CT group, 160 in X-ray group, and 82 in symptomatic-prompted group. The percentage of bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC) was 65.1% in CT-screen group. The ratio of stage IA tumors in CT-screen group was 88.5% and the ratio of advanced cases (i.e. stages IIIB+IV) was 2.3%. The 5-year-survival rates were 95.0% in CT-screen, 73.0% in X-ray-screen and 40.0% in symptomatic-prompted group. We performed further sub-analysis which excluded pure BACs (i.e. Noguchi types A and B) or pure GGOs within a 10mm diameter because this is indicative of a very favorable prognosis. Based on this sub-analysis the number of the subjects in each group became 76 in CT group; 140 in X-ray group and 77 in symptomatic-prompted group. The principal characteristics of the patients such as age and sex became almost even in the three arms. In CT-screen subgroup, the ratio of stage IA cancer was 69.7% and of advanced cases was 6.6%. This advanced ratio was lower than both X-ray-screen (22.1%) and symptomatic-prompted (61.9%) groups. The 5-year-survival rates were 89.9% among CT-screen group patients, 72.6% for X-ray screen cases and 39.1% in symptomatic-prompted group. A CT-screen was found to be one of the independent prognostic factors for lung cancer (HR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.12-0.72) and based on this would be expected to reduce the risk of lung cancer death by 78% compared with non-screened cases. In conclusion, CT will improve the survival rate and decrease the rate of advanced cancers in never-smokers via the existing annual screening system. CT-screening is also an independent prognostic improvement factor in never-smokers, and will therefore reduce the risk of lung cancer death.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21663997     DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lung Cancer        ISSN: 0169-5002            Impact factor:   5.705


  8 in total

1.  Measures of outcome in lung cancer screening: maximising the benefits.

Authors:  Robert Peter Young; Raewyn Janice Hopkins
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Tumor size and computed tomography attenuation of pulmonary pure ground-glass nodules are useful for predicting pathological invasiveness.

Authors:  Takashi Eguchi; Akihiko Yoshizawa; Satoshi Kawakami; Hirotaka Kumeda; Tetsuya Umesaki; Hiroyuki Agatsuma; Takao Sakaizawa; Yoshiaki Tominaga; Masayuki Toishi; Masahiro Hashizume; Takayuki Shiina; Kazuo Yoshida; Shiho Asaka; Mina Matsushita; Tomonobu Koizumi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Chronological changes in lung cancer surgery in a single Japanese institution.

Authors:  Haruhiko Nakamura; Hiroki Sakai; Hiroyuki Kimura; Tomoyuki Miyazawa; Hideki Marushima; Hisashi Saji
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  Participation in lung cancer screening programs: are there gender and social differences? A systematic review.

Authors:  Stefanie Schütte; Damien Dietrich; Xavier Montet; Antoine Flahault
Journal:  Public Health Rev       Date:  2018-08-15

5.  Cost-effectiveness and health impact of lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography for never smokers in Japan and the United States: a modelling study.

Authors:  Akiko Kowada
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 3.317

6.  Differences in detection patterns, characteristics, and outcomes of central and peripheral lung cancers in low-dose computed tomography screening.

Authors:  Yeon Wook Kim; Minhee Jeon; Myung Jin Song; Byoung Soo Kwon; Sung Yoon Lim; Yeon Joo Lee; Jong Sun Park; Young-Jae Cho; Ho Il Yoon; Kyung Won Lee; Jae Ho Lee; Choon-Taek Lee
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2021-11

7.  Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose CT in Female Never Smokers: Retrospective Cohort Study with Long-term National Data Follow-up.

Authors:  Hyae Young Kim; Kyu-Won Jung; Kun Young Lim; Soo-Hyun Lee; Jae Kwan Jun; Jeongseon Kim; Bin Hwangbo; Jin Soo Lee
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 4.679

8.  Lung cancer probability and clinical outcomes of baseline and new subsolid nodules detected on low-dose CT screening.

Authors:  Yeon Wook Kim; Byoung Soo Kwon; Sung Yoon Lim; Yeon Joo Lee; Jong Sun Park; Young-Jae Cho; Ho Il Yoon; Kyung Won Lee; Jae Ho Lee; Jin-Haeng Chung; Eunjeong Ji; Choon-Taek Lee
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 9.139

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.