Literature DB >> 21663995

Different efficacy of CT screening for lung cancer according to histological type: analysis of Japanese-smoker cases detected using a low-dose CT screen.

Ryoichi Kondo1, Kazuo Yoshida, Satoshi Kawakami, Takayuki Shiina, Makoto Kurai, Keiichiro Takasuna, Hiroshi Yamamoto, Tomonori Koizumi, Takayuki Honda, Keishi Kubo.   

Abstract

The efficacy of CT screening for lung cancers is still a controversial issue, although one of the recently publicized large randomized controlled trials of this methodology, the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST), reported a decrease in the lung cancer-specific mortality for heavy smokers. We here performed case-matched comparative analyses, as a retrospective study, of three lung cancer arms detected by CT screen, X-ray screen, and by individual analysis of the clinicopathological features and outcomes in smokers from a symptomatic-prompted group of patients. We also considered the impacts of various potential biases in this cohort. The total study cohort comprised 136 patients in the CT screen group, 263 in the X-ray screen group and 254 in the symptomatic-prompted group. The ratio of stage IA cancers in the CT screen group was 67.7% and the ratio of advanced cases (i.e. stages IIIB+IV) was 12.5%. The percentage of bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC) was 28.7% in the CT screen group. The 5-year survival rates were 82.4% in the CT screen group, 38.0% in the X-ray screen group and 17.8% in the symptomatic-prompted group. CT screening was found to be an independent prognostic factor for lung cancer even when BAC cases were eliminated (HR 0.35, P<0.01). Based on our sub-analysis by individual histological sub-type, CT screen lung cancer cases had a better survival rate than non-screened patients, which included adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma and large/small cell carcinoma. However, by multi-variant analysis a CT scan would not be expected to reduce the risk of lung cancer mortality in patients with large/small cell carcinoma, although would be expected to reduce the risk of lung cancer death by 80% in cases of both adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. In conclusion, our current findings indicate that CT screening for lung cancer is an effective strategy for smokers and that patients with adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of all variant histological types may benefit from this test. In this regard, early stage large/small cell carcinomas are insufficiently detected by the existing annual screening system.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21663995     DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lung Cancer        ISSN: 0169-5002            Impact factor:   5.705


  8 in total

1.  Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with small cell lung cancer detected by CT screening.

Authors:  Toshirou Fukushima; Kazunari Tateishi; Hiroshi Yamamoto; Masayuki Hanaoka; Keishi Kubo; Tomonobu Koizumi
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Differences in clinical presentation of non-small cell lung cancer in never-smokers versus smokers.

Authors:  Joo Young Lee; Im Ii Na; Seung-Hun Jang; Yong Il Hwang; Du Hwan Choe; Cheol Hyeon Kim; Heejong Baek
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Preoperative Watchful-Waiting Time and Surgical Outcome of Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Found by Chest Low-Dose CT Screening.

Authors:  Takaomi Hanaoka; Makoto Kurai; Mitsuyo Okada; Satoshi Ishizone; Fumitoshi Karasawa; Akira Iizuka
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Characteristics and Outcomes of Small Cell Lung Cancer Detected by CT Screening.

Authors:  Anish Thomas; Puskar Pattanayak; Eva Szabo; Paul Pinsky
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  The National Lung Screening Trial: results stratified by demographics, smoking history, and lung cancer histology.

Authors:  Paul F Pinsky; Timothy R Church; Grant Izmirlian; Barnett S Kramer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Tumor size and computed tomography attenuation of pulmonary pure ground-glass nodules are useful for predicting pathological invasiveness.

Authors:  Takashi Eguchi; Akihiko Yoshizawa; Satoshi Kawakami; Hirotaka Kumeda; Tetsuya Umesaki; Hiroyuki Agatsuma; Takao Sakaizawa; Yoshiaki Tominaga; Masayuki Toishi; Masahiro Hashizume; Takayuki Shiina; Kazuo Yoshida; Shiho Asaka; Mina Matsushita; Tomonobu Koizumi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Surgical outcomes in patients with small cell lung cancer: comparative analysis of computed tomograpy-detected patients with others.

Authors:  Tomonobu Koizumi; Toshirou Fukushima; Kazutoshi Hamanaka; Takayuki Shiina; Kazuo Yoshida; Ryoichi Kondo; Ryouhei Yamamoto; Nobuhiro Nishizawa
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 2.754

8.  Differences in Patient Outcomes of Prevalence, Interval, and Screen-Detected Lung Cancers in the CT Arm of the National Lung Screening Trial.

Authors:  Matthew B Schabath; Pierre P Massion; Zachary J Thompson; Steven A Eschrich; Yoganand Balagurunathan; Dmitry Goldof; Denise R Aberle; Robert J Gillies
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.