OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a systematic approach for measurement of aortic annulus dimensions by cardiac computed tomography. METHODS: CT data sets of 64 patients were evaluated. An oblique cross-section aligned with the aortic root was created by systematically identifying the caudal insertion points of the three aortic cusps and sequentially aligning them in a double oblique plane. Aortic annulus dimensions, distances of coronary ostia and a suitable fluoroscopic projection angle were independently determined by two observers. RESULTS: Interobserver intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for aortic annulus diameters were excellent (ICC 0.89-0.93). Agreement for prosthesis size selection was excellent (ĸ = 0.86 for mean, ĸ = 0.84 for area-derived and ĸ = 0.91 for circumference-derived diameter). Mean distances of the left/right coronary ostium were 13.4 ± 2.4/14.4 ± 2.8 mm for observer 1 and 13.2 ± 2.7/13.5 ± 3.2 mm for observer 2 (p = 0.30 and p = 0.0001, respectively; ICC 0.76/0.77 for left/right coronary artery). A difference of less than 10° for fluoroscopic projection angle was achieved in 84.3% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: A systematic approach to generate a double oblique imaging plane exactly aligned with the aortic annulus demonstrates high interobserver and intraobserver agreements for derived measurements which are not influenced by aortic root calcification. KEY POINTS: • Systematic approach to generate a double oblique imaging plane for TAVI evaluation. • This method is straightforward and software independent. • An approach with high reproducibility, not influenced by aortic root calcification.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a systematic approach for measurement of aortic annulus dimensions by cardiac computed tomography. METHODS: CT data sets of 64 patients were evaluated. An oblique cross-section aligned with the aortic root was created by systematically identifying the caudal insertion points of the three aortic cusps and sequentially aligning them in a double oblique plane. Aortic annulus dimensions, distances of coronary ostia and a suitable fluoroscopic projection angle were independently determined by two observers. RESULTS: Interobserver intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for aortic annulus diameters were excellent (ICC 0.89-0.93). Agreement for prosthesis size selection was excellent (ĸ = 0.86 for mean, ĸ = 0.84 for area-derived and ĸ = 0.91 for circumference-derived diameter). Mean distances of the left/right coronary ostium were 13.4 ± 2.4/14.4 ± 2.8 mm for observer 1 and 13.2 ± 2.7/13.5 ± 3.2 mm for observer 2 (p = 0.30 and p = 0.0001, respectively; ICC 0.76/0.77 for left/right coronary artery). A difference of less than 10° for fluoroscopic projection angle was achieved in 84.3% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: A systematic approach to generate a double oblique imaging plane exactly aligned with the aortic annulus demonstrates high interobserver and intraobserver agreements for derived measurements which are not influenced by aortic root calcification. KEY POINTS: • Systematic approach to generate a double oblique imaging plane for TAVI evaluation. • This method is straightforward and software independent. • An approach with high reproducibility, not influenced by aortic root calcification.
Authors: Ronen Gurvitch; John G Webb; Ren Yuan; Mark Johnson; Cameron Hague; Alexander B Willson; Stefan Toggweiler; David A Wood; Jian Ye; Robert Moss; Christopher R Thompson; Stephan Achenbach; James K Min; Troy M Labounty; Ricardo Cury; Jonathon Leipsic Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: Apostolos Tzikas; Carl J Schultz; Nicolo Piazza; Adrian Moelker; Nicolas M Van Mieghem; Rutger-Jan Nuis; Robert-Jan van Geuns; Marcel L Geleijnse; Patrick W Serruys; Peter P T de Jaegere Journal: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2011-04-14 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Vikram Kurra; Samir R Kapadia; E Murat Tuzcu; Sandra S Halliburton; Lars Svensson; Eric E Roselli; Paul Schoenhagen Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: Alexander B Willson; John G Webb; Troy M Labounty; Stephan Achenbach; Robert Moss; Miriam Wheeler; Christopher Thompson; James K Min; Ronen Gurvitch; Bjarne L Norgaard; Cameron J Hague; Stefan Toggweiler; Ronald Binder; Melanie Freeman; Rohan Poulter; Steen Poulsen; David A Wood; Jonathon Leipsic Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-02-22 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Ronald K Binder; Jonathon Leipsic; David Wood; Teri Moore; Stefan Toggweiler; Alex Willson; Ronen Gurvitch; Melanie Freeman; John G Webb Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2012-03-20 Impact factor: 6.546
Authors: Ronald K Binder; John G Webb; Alexander B Willson; Marina Urena; Nicolaj C Hansson; Bjarne L Norgaard; Philippe Pibarot; Marco Barbanti; Eric Larose; Melanie Freeman; Eric Dumont; Chris Thompson; Miriam Wheeler; Robert R Moss; Tae-hyun Yang; Sergio Pasian; Cameron J Hague; Giang Nguyen; Rekha Raju; Stefan Toggweiler; James K Min; David A Wood; Josep Rodés-Cabau; Jonathon Leipsic Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-05-15 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Xiaohan Hu; Claudia Frellesen; Ralf W Bauer; J Matthias Kerl; Martin Beeres; Boris Bodelle; Thomas Lehnert; Thomas J Vogl; Julian L Wichmann Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2015-02-03 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Borek Foldyna; Camelia Jungert; Christian Luecke; Konstantin von Aspern; Sonja Boehmer-Lasthaus; Eva Maria Rueth; Matthias Grothoff; Stefan Nitzsche; Matthias Gutberlet; Friedrich Wilhelm Mohr; Lukas Lehmkuhl Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2015-04-19 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Pascal Theriault-Lauzier; Hind Alsosaimi; Negareh Mousavi; Jean Buithieu; Marco Spaziano; Giuseppe Martucci; James Brophy; Nicolo Piazza Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2020-03-04 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Csilla Celeng; Márton Kolossváry; Attila Kovács; Andrea Ágnes Molnár; Bálint Szilveszter; Tamás Horváth; Mihály Károlyi; Ádám L Jermendy; Ádám D Tárnoki; Dávid L Tárnoki; Júlia Karády; Szilard Voros; György Jermendy; Béla Merkely; Pál Maurovich-Horvat Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-09-22 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Peter Dankerl; Matthias Hammon; Hannes Seuss; Monique Tröbs; Annika Schuhbaeck; Michaela M Hell; Alexander Cavallaro; Stephan Achenbach; Michael Uder; Mohamed Marwan Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2016-09-07 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Simon S Martin; Moritz H Albrecht; Julian L Wichmann; Kristina Hüsers; Jan-Erik Scholtz; Christian Booz; Boris Bodelle; Ralf W Bauer; Sarah C Metzger; Thomas J Vogl; Thomas Lehnert Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-05-28 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Daniel O Bittner; Martin Arnold; Lutz Klinghammer; Annika Schuhbaeck; Michaela M Hell; Gerd Muschiol; Soeren Gauss; Michael Lell; Michael Uder; Udo Hoffmann; Stephan Achenbach; Mohamed Marwan Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-03-19 Impact factor: 5.315