Literature DB >> 24845112

Reproducibility of aortic annulus measurements by computed tomography.

Annika Schuhbaeck1, Stephan Achenbach, Tobias Pflederer, Mohamed Marwan, Jasmin Schmid, Holger Nef, Johannes Rixe, Franziska Hecker, Christian Schneider, Michael Lell, Michael Uder, Martin Arnold.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a systematic approach for measurement of aortic annulus dimensions by cardiac computed tomography.
METHODS: CT data sets of 64 patients were evaluated. An oblique cross-section aligned with the aortic root was created by systematically identifying the caudal insertion points of the three aortic cusps and sequentially aligning them in a double oblique plane. Aortic annulus dimensions, distances of coronary ostia and a suitable fluoroscopic projection angle were independently determined by two observers.
RESULTS: Interobserver intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for aortic annulus diameters were excellent (ICC 0.89-0.93). Agreement for prosthesis size selection was excellent (ĸ = 0.86 for mean, ĸ = 0.84 for area-derived and ĸ = 0.91 for circumference-derived diameter). Mean distances of the left/right coronary ostium were 13.4 ± 2.4/14.4 ± 2.8 mm for observer 1 and 13.2 ± 2.7/13.5 ± 3.2 mm for observer 2 (p = 0.30 and p = 0.0001, respectively; ICC 0.76/0.77 for left/right coronary artery). A difference of less than 10° for fluoroscopic projection angle was achieved in 84.3% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: A systematic approach to generate a double oblique imaging plane exactly aligned with the aortic annulus demonstrates high interobserver and intraobserver agreements for derived measurements which are not influenced by aortic root calcification. KEY POINTS: • Systematic approach to generate a double oblique imaging plane for TAVI evaluation. • This method is straightforward and software independent. • An approach with high reproducibility, not influenced by aortic root calcification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24845112     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-014-3199-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  25 in total

1.  Aortic annulus diameter determination by multidetector computed tomography: reproducibility, applicability, and implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Ronen Gurvitch; John G Webb; Ren Yuan; Mark Johnson; Cameron Hague; Alexander B Willson; Stefan Toggweiler; David A Wood; Jian Ye; Robert Moss; Christopher R Thompson; Stephan Achenbach; James K Min; Troy M Labounty; Ricardo Cury; Jonathon Leipsic
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 11.195

2.  Assessment of the aortic annulus by multislice computed tomography, contrast aortography, and trans-thoracic echocardiography in patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Apostolos Tzikas; Carl J Schultz; Nicolo Piazza; Adrian Moelker; Nicolas M Van Mieghem; Rutger-Jan Nuis; Robert-Jan van Geuns; Marcel L Geleijnse; Patrick W Serruys; Peter P T de Jaegere
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Multislice computed tomography for prediction of optimal angiographic deployment projections during transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Ronen Gurvitch; David A Wood; Jonathon Leipsic; Edgar Tay; Mark Johnson; Jian Ye; Fabian Nietlispach; Namal Wijesinghe; Anson Cheung; John G Webb
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 11.195

4.  Pre-procedural imaging of aortic root orientation and dimensions: comparison between X-ray angiographic planar imaging and 3-dimensional multidetector row computed tomography.

Authors:  Vikram Kurra; Samir R Kapadia; E Murat Tuzcu; Sandra S Halliburton; Lars Svensson; Eric E Roselli; Paul Schoenhagen
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 11.195

5.  3-dimensional aortic annular assessment by multidetector computed tomography predicts moderate or severe paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a multicenter retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Alexander B Willson; John G Webb; Troy M Labounty; Stephan Achenbach; Robert Moss; Miriam Wheeler; Christopher Thompson; James K Min; Ronen Gurvitch; Bjarne L Norgaard; Cameron J Hague; Stefan Toggweiler; Ronald Binder; Melanie Freeman; Rohan Poulter; Steen Poulsen; David A Wood; Jonathon Leipsic
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Prosthesis oversizing in balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve implantation is associated with contained rupture of the aortic root.

Authors:  Philipp Blanke; Jochen Reinöhl; Christian Schlensak; Matthias Siepe; Gregor Pache; Wulf Euringer; Annette Geibel-Zehender; Christopher Bode; Mathias Langer; Friedhelm Beyersdorf; Manfred Zehender
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 6.546

7.  Prediction of optimal deployment projection for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: angiographic 3-dimensional reconstruction of the aortic root versus multidetector computed tomography.

Authors:  Ronald K Binder; Jonathon Leipsic; David Wood; Teri Moore; Stefan Toggweiler; Alex Willson; Ronen Gurvitch; Melanie Freeman; John G Webb
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 6.546

8.  Acute left main obstructions following TAVI.

Authors:  Eugenio Stabile; Giovanni Sorropago; Angelo Cioppa; Linda Cota; Marco Agrusta; Vincenzo Lucchetti; Paolo Rubino
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 6.534

9.  Feasibility and accuracy of 3DTEE versus CT for the evaluation of aortic valve annulus to left main ostium distance before transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Gloria Tamborini; Laura Fusini; Paola Gripari; Manuela Muratori; Claudia Cefalù; Francesco Maffessanti; Francesco Alamanni; Antonio Bartorelli; Gianluca Pontone; Daniele Andreini; Erika Bertella; Cesare Fiorentini; Mauro Pepi
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-06

10.  The impact of integration of a multidetector computed tomography annulus area sizing algorithm on outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a prospective, multicenter, controlled trial.

Authors:  Ronald K Binder; John G Webb; Alexander B Willson; Marina Urena; Nicolaj C Hansson; Bjarne L Norgaard; Philippe Pibarot; Marco Barbanti; Eric Larose; Melanie Freeman; Eric Dumont; Chris Thompson; Miriam Wheeler; Robert R Moss; Tae-hyun Yang; Sergio Pasian; Cameron J Hague; Giang Nguyen; Rekha Raju; Stefan Toggweiler; James K Min; David A Wood; Josep Rodés-Cabau; Jonathon Leipsic
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  13 in total

1.  Computed tomography of dynamic changes of the aortic root during systole and diastole in patients with coronary artery calcification.

Authors:  Xiaohan Hu; Claudia Frellesen; Ralf W Bauer; J Matthias Kerl; Martin Beeres; Boris Bodelle; Thomas Lehnert; Thomas J Vogl; Julian L Wichmann
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  CT evaluation prior to transapical aortic valve replacement: semi-automatic versus manual image segmentation.

Authors:  Borek Foldyna; Camelia Jungert; Christian Luecke; Konstantin von Aspern; Sonja Boehmer-Lasthaus; Eva Maria Rueth; Matthias Grothoff; Stefan Nitzsche; Matthias Gutberlet; Friedrich Wilhelm Mohr; Lukas Lehmkuhl
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  CT support of cardiac structural interventions.

Authors:  Michaela M Hell; Stephan Achenbach
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  [Value of ultrasound shear wave elasticity imaging in diagnosis of Hashimoto's thyroiditis].

Authors:  Wei Wang; Hai-Ning Zheng; Qiong Wang; Yi-Xiao Han; Qing-Gui Ye; Chao-Yang Wen
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2017-05-20

Review 5.  Standard imaging techniques in transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Arash Salemi; Berhane M Worku
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Recursive multiresolution convolutional neural networks for 3D aortic valve annulus planimetry.

Authors:  Pascal Theriault-Lauzier; Hind Alsosaimi; Negareh Mousavi; Jean Buithieu; Marco Spaziano; Giuseppe Martucci; James Brophy; Nicolo Piazza
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  Aortic root dimensions are predominantly determined by genetic factors: a classical twin study.

Authors:  Csilla Celeng; Márton Kolossváry; Attila Kovács; Andrea Ágnes Molnár; Bálint Szilveszter; Tamás Horváth; Mihály Károlyi; Ádám L Jermendy; Ádám D Tárnoki; Dávid L Tárnoki; Júlia Karády; Szilard Voros; György Jermendy; Béla Merkely; Pál Maurovich-Horvat
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Computer-aided evaluation of low-dose and low-contrast agent third-generation dual-source CT angiography prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

Authors:  Peter Dankerl; Matthias Hammon; Hannes Seuss; Monique Tröbs; Annika Schuhbaeck; Michaela M Hell; Alexander Cavallaro; Stephan Achenbach; Michael Uder; Mohamed Marwan
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 2.924

9.  Value of a noise-optimized virtual monoenergetic reconstruction technique in dual-energy CT for planning of transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Simon S Martin; Moritz H Albrecht; Julian L Wichmann; Kristina Hüsers; Jan-Erik Scholtz; Christian Booz; Boris Bodelle; Ralf W Bauer; Sarah C Metzger; Thomas J Vogl; Thomas Lehnert
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Contrast volume reduction using third generation dual source computed tomography for the evaluation of patients prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Daniel O Bittner; Martin Arnold; Lutz Klinghammer; Annika Schuhbaeck; Michaela M Hell; Gerd Muschiol; Soeren Gauss; Michael Lell; Michael Uder; Udo Hoffmann; Stephan Achenbach; Mohamed Marwan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.