Literature DB >> 22365423

3-dimensional aortic annular assessment by multidetector computed tomography predicts moderate or severe paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a multicenter retrospective analysis.

Alexander B Willson1, John G Webb, Troy M Labounty, Stephan Achenbach, Robert Moss, Miriam Wheeler, Christopher Thompson, James K Min, Ronen Gurvitch, Bjarne L Norgaard, Cameron J Hague, Stefan Toggweiler, Ronald Binder, Melanie Freeman, Rohan Poulter, Steen Poulsen, David A Wood, Jonathon Leipsic.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to analyze multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) 3-dimensional aortic annular dimensions for the prediction of paravalvular aortic regurgitation (PAR) following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).
BACKGROUND: Moderate or severe PAR after TAVR is associated with increased morbidity and mortality.
METHODS: A total of 109 consecutive patients underwent MDCT pre-TAVR with a balloon expandable aortic valve. Differences between transcatheter heart valve (THV) size and MDCT measures of annular size (mean diameter, area, and circumference) were analyzed concerning prediction of PAR. Patients with THV malposition (n = 7) were excluded. In 50 patients, MDCT was repeated after TAVR to assess THV eccentricity (1 - short diameter/long diameter) and expansion (MDCT measured THV area/nominal THV area).
RESULTS: Moderate or severe PAR (13 of 102) was associated with THV undersizing (THV diameter - mean diameter = -0.7 ± 1.4 mm vs. 0.9 ± 1.8 mm for trivial to mild PAR, p < 0.01). The difference between THV size and MDCT annular size was predictive of PAR (mean diameter: area under the curve [AUC]: 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.68 to 0.88; area: AUC: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.65 to 0.90; circumference: AUC: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.59 to 0.91). Annular eccentricity was not associated with PAR (AUC: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.46 to 0.75). We found that 35.3% (36 of 102) and 45.1% (46 of 102) of THVs were undersized relative to the MDCT mean diameter and area, respectively. THV oversizing relative to the annular area was not associated with THV eccentricity or underexpansion (oversized vs. undersized THVs; expansion: 102.7 ± 5.3% vs. 106.1 ± 5.6%, p = 0.03; eccentricity: median: 1.7% [interquartile range: 1.4% to 3.0%] vs. 1.7% [interquartile range: 1.1% to 2.7%], p = 0.28).
CONCLUSIONS: MDCT-derived 3-dimensional aortic annular measurements are predictive of moderate or severe PAR following TAVR. Oversizing of THVs may reduce the risk of moderate or severe PAR.
Copyright © 2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22365423     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  71 in total

Review 1.  Role of Cardiac CT Before Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI).

Authors:  Mohamed Marwan; Stephan Achenbach
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  DNA transposons in vertebrate functional genomics.

Authors:  C Miskey; Z Izsvák; K Kawakami; Z Ivics
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.261

3.  Transapical aortic valve implantation: The Vancouver experience.

Authors:  Jennifer Higgins; Jian Ye; Stefan Toggweiler; John G Webb; Anson Cheung
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-07

4.  Sizing the aortic annulus.

Authors:  Alfredo G Cerillo; Massimiliano Mariani; Sergio Berti; Mattia Glauber
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-07

Review 5.  Guidance of transcatheter aortic valve replacement by echocardiography.

Authors:  Rebecca T Hahn
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 6.  Vascular approaches for transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Isaac Pascual; Amelia Carro; Pablo Avanzas; Daniel Hernández-Vaquero; Rocío Díaz; Jose Rozado; Rebeca Lorca; María Martín; Jacobo Silva; César Morís
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 7.  Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: an update.

Authors:  Sharif A Halim; Todd L Kiefer; G Chad Hughes; Lynne M Hurwitz; J Kevin Harrison
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 8.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in bicuspid anatomy.

Authors:  Zhen-Gang Zhao; Hasan Jilaihawi; Yuan Feng; Mao Chen
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 9.  [Aortic valve stenosis: computed tomography prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). How can the outcome be improved?].

Authors:  M Hell; S Achenbach; M Arnold
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 10.  Important advances in technology and unique applications to cardiovascular computed tomography.

Authors:  Kongkiat Chaikriangkrai; Su Yeon Choi; Faisal Nabi; Su Min Chang
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.