Literature DB >> 24838735

Preoperative differentiation between T1a and ≥T1b gallbladder cancer: combined interpretation of high-resolution ultrasound and multidetector-row computed tomography.

Ijin Joo1, Jae Young Lee, Jee Hyun Baek, Jung Hoon Kim, Hee Sun Park, Joon Koo Han, Byung Ihn Choi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the diagnostic value of combined interpretation of high-resolution ultrasound (HRUS) and multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) for preoperative differentiation between T1a and ≥T1b gallbladder (GB) cancer.
METHODS: Eighty-seven patients with pathologically confirmed GB cancers (T1a, n = 15; ≥T1b, n = 72), who preoperatively underwent both HRUS and MDCT, were included in this retrospective study. Two reviewers independently determined the T-stages of the GB cancers on HRUS and MDCT using a five-point confidence scale (5, definitely T1a; 1, definitely ≥T1b). For individual modality interpretation, the lesions with scores ≥4 were classified as T1a, and, for combined modality interpretation, the lesions with all scores ≥4 in both modalities were classified as T1a. The McNemar test was used to compare diagnostic performance.
RESULTS: The diagnostic accuracy of differentiation between T1a and ≥T1b GB cancer was higher using combined interpretation (90.8% and 88.5% for reviewers 1 and 2, respectively) than individual interpretation of HRUS (82.8% and 83.9%) or MDCT (74.7% and 82.8%) (P < 0.05, reviewer 1). Combined interpretations demonstrated 100% specificity for both reviewers, which was significantly higher than individual interpretations (P < 0.05, both reviewers).
CONCLUSIONS: Combined HRUS and MDCT interpretation may improve the diagnostic accuracy and specificity for differentiating between T1a and ≥T1b GB cancers. KEY POINTS: • Differentiating between T1a and ≥T1b gallbladder cancer can help surgical planning. • HRUS and MDCT are useful for local staging of gallbladder cancer. • HRUS and MDCT may be synergistic for T-staging of gallbladder cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24838735     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-014-3206-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  30 in total

1.  Differentiation of adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder from early-stage, wall-thickening-type gallbladder cancer using high-resolution ultrasound.

Authors:  Ijin Joo; Jae Young Lee; Jung Hoon Kim; Soo Jin Kim; Min A Kim; Joon Koo Han; Byung Ihn Choi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Impact of obesity on medical imaging and image-guided intervention.

Authors:  Raul N Uppot; Dushyant V Sahani; Peter F Hahn; Debra Gervais; Peter R Mueller
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Incidental gallbladder cancer by the AFC-GBC-2009 Study Group.

Authors:  David Fuks; Jean Marc Regimbeau; Yves-Patrice Le Treut; Philippe Bachellier; Artivas Raventos; François-René Pruvot; Laurence Chiche; Olivier Farges
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Radical resection for T1b gallbladder cancer: a decision analysis.

Authors:  Michael A Abramson; Pari Pandharipande; Daniel Ruan; Jason S Gold; Edward E Whang
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 5.  A clinical algorithm for the assessment of pancreatic lesions: utilization of 16- and 64-section multidetector CT and endoscopic ultrasound.

Authors:  A Rafique; S Freeman; N Carroll
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2007-09-25       Impact factor: 2.350

Review 6.  Polypoid lesions of the gallbladder.

Authors:  Kit Fai Lee; John Wong; Jimmy Chak Man Li; Paul Bo San Lai
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Helical CT of the local spread of carcinoma of the gallbladder: evaluation according to the TNM system in patients who underwent surgical resection.

Authors:  Kengo Yoshimitsu; Hiroshi Honda; Kenji Shinozaki; Hitoshi Aibe; Toshiro Kuroiwa; Hiroyuki Irie; Kazuo Chijiiwa; Yoshiki Asayama; Kouji Masuda
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Incidental gallbladder cancer during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: managing an unexpected finding.

Authors:  Andrea Cavallaro; Gaetano Piccolo; Vincenzo Panebianco; Emanuele Lo Menzo; Massimiliano Berretta; Antonio Zanghì; Maria Di Vita; Alessandro Cappellani
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Accuracy of preoperative T-staging of gallbladder carcinoma using MDCT.

Authors:  Soo Jin Kim; Jeong Min Lee; Jae Young Lee; Jin Young Choi; Se Hyung Kim; Joon Koo Han; Byung Ihn Choi
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  The imaging evaluation of cholelithiasis in the obese patient-ultrasound vs CT cholecystography: our experience with the bariatric surgery population.

Authors:  Tyler Neitlich; Jeffrey Neitlich
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 4.129

View more
  4 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy of transabdominal high-resolution US for staging gallbladder cancer and differential diagnosis of neoplastic polyps compared with EUS.

Authors:  Jeong Sub Lee; Jung Hoon Kim; Yong Jae Kim; Ji Kon Ryu; Yong-Tae Kim; Jae Young Lee; Joon Koo Han
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Outcome and CT differentiation of gallbladder neuroendocrine tumours from adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Tae-Hyung Kim; Se Hyung Kim; Kyoung Boon Lee; Joon Koo Han
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Benign gallbladder diseases: Imaging techniques and tips for differentiating with malignant gallbladder diseases.

Authors:  Mi Hye Yu; Young Jun Kim; Hee Sun Park; Sung Il Jung
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  A Comparison Between the Prognosis of Simultaneous and Salvage Radical Resection in Incidental Gallbladder Cancer.

Authors:  Shilin He; Tunan Yu; Parikshit Asutosh Khadaroo; Liuxin Cai; Yeyuan Chu; Fangqiang Wei; Xiao Liang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 3.989

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.