BACKGROUND: Incidental gallbladder cancer (GBC) is frequently discovered on the specimen when cholecystectomy for a benign disease is performed. The objective of the present study was to assess the management of incidental GBC patients in a French registry. METHODS: Data on patients with GBC treated between 1998 and 2008 were retrospectively collated in a French, multicenter database. RESULTS: The registry contained 218 patients with incidental GBC (67 men and 151 women; median age = 64 years; age range = 31-88). One hundred forty-eight (68%) patients underwent re-resection after a median time interval of 48 days (range = 2-245). The most common complete procedure (66% of cases) was 4b + 5 segmentectomy with lymphadenectomy but not bile duct resection. Port-site excision was performed in 54 patients. The mortality and morbidity rates were 3 and 37%, respectively. Resection of the common bile duct (43%) increased postoperative complications (60 vs. 23%, p = 0.0001). Local residual tumor was found in 83 (56%) patients; it was significantly correlated with the T stage and influenced long-term survival. R0 was obtained in 143 (97%) patients and port-site invasion was histologically confirmed in one patient (1.8%). After a median follow-up period of 34 months, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates for the 148 patients with re-resection were 76, 54, and 41%, respectively. Re-resection significantly increased survival in patients with T2 (p = 0.0001) and T3 (p = 0.04) disease. Resection of the common bile duct increased neither R0 resection nor overall survival (p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: This study validates the concept of re-resection in T2 and T3 GBC. Bile duct resection increases postoperative morbidity but does not improve survival. There is currently a modification in the surgical management of incidental GBC, with minor liver resection and no common bile duct resection.
BACKGROUND: Incidental gallbladder cancer (GBC) is frequently discovered on the specimen when cholecystectomy for a benign disease is performed. The objective of the present study was to assess the management of incidental GBC patients in a French registry. METHODS: Data on patients with GBC treated between 1998 and 2008 were retrospectively collated in a French, multicenter database. RESULTS: The registry contained 218 patients with incidental GBC (67 men and 151 women; median age = 64 years; age range = 31-88). One hundred forty-eight (68%) patients underwent re-resection after a median time interval of 48 days (range = 2-245). The most common complete procedure (66% of cases) was 4b + 5 segmentectomy with lymphadenectomy but not bile duct resection. Port-site excision was performed in 54 patients. The mortality and morbidity rates were 3 and 37%, respectively. Resection of the common bile duct (43%) increased postoperative complications (60 vs. 23%, p = 0.0001). Local residual tumor was found in 83 (56%) patients; it was significantly correlated with the T stage and influenced long-term survival. R0 was obtained in 143 (97%) patients and port-site invasion was histologically confirmed in one patient (1.8%). After a median follow-up period of 34 months, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates for the 148 patients with re-resection were 76, 54, and 41%, respectively. Re-resection significantly increased survival in patients with T2 (p = 0.0001) and T3 (p = 0.04) disease. Resection of the common bile duct increased neither R0 resection nor overall survival (p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: This study validates the concept of re-resection in T2 and T3 GBC. Bile duct resection increases postoperative morbidity but does not improve survival. There is currently a modification in the surgical management of incidental GBC, with minor liver resection and no common bile duct resection.
Authors: Samuel J Wang; Andrew Lemieux; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Celine B Ord; Gary V Walker; C David Fuller; Jong-Sung Kim; Charles R Thomas Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-11-07 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Thomas A Aloia; Nicolas Járufe; Milind Javle; Shishir K Maithel; Juan C Roa; Volkan Adsay; Felipe J F Coimbra; William R Jarnagin Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Cecilia G Ethun; Nina Le; Alexandra G Lopez-Aguiar; Timothy M Pawlik; George Poultsides; Thuy Tran; Kamran Idrees; Chelsea A Isom; Ryan C Fields; Bradley A Krasnick; Sharon M Weber; Ahmed Salem; Robert C G Martin; Charles R Scoggins; Perry Shen; Harveshp D Mogal; Carl Schmidt; Eliza Beal; Ioannis Hatzaras; Rivfka Shenoy; Maria C Russell; Shishir K Maithel Journal: Am Surg Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 0.688
Authors: Raphael L C Araujo; Marco Aurélio de Sanctis; Tomás R V Coelho; Fernando E C Felippe; Diego Burgardt; Durval R Wohnrath Journal: J Gastrointest Cancer Date: 2020-03
Authors: Kui Sun Choi; Sae Byeol Choi; Pyoungjae Park; Wan Bae Kim; Sang Yong Choi Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-01-28 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Fabio Ausania; Theodoris Tsirlis; Steven A White; Jeremy J French; Bryon C Jaques; Richard M Charnley; Derek M Manas Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2013-01-07 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Faiz Gani; Stefan Buettner; Georgios A Margonis; Cecilia G Ethun; George Poultsides; Thuy Tran; Kamran Idrees; Chelsea A Isom; Ryan C Fields; Bradley Krasnick; Sharon M Weber; Ahmed Salem; Robert C G Martin; Charles Scoggins; Perry Shen; Harveshp D Mogal; Carl Schmidt; Eliza Beal; Ioannis Hatzaras; Rivfka Shenoy; Shishir K Maithel; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2016-05-20 Impact factor: 3.454