Literature DB >> 27832311

Diagnostic accuracy of transabdominal high-resolution US for staging gallbladder cancer and differential diagnosis of neoplastic polyps compared with EUS.

Jeong Sub Lee1, Jung Hoon Kim2,3, Yong Jae Kim4, Ji Kon Ryu5, Yong-Tae Kim5, Jae Young Lee1,6, Joon Koo Han1,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of transabdominal high-resolution ultrasound (HRUS) for staging gallbladder cancer and differential diagnosis of neoplastic polyps compared with endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and pathology.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among 125 patients who underwent both HRUS and EUS, we included 29 pathologically proven cancers (T1 = 7, T2 = 19, T3 = 3) including 15 polypoid cancers and 50 surgically proven polyps (neoplastic = 30, non-neoplastic = 20). We reviewed formal reports and assessed the accuracy of HRUS and EUS for diagnosing cancer as well as the differential diagnosis of neoplastic polyps. Statistical analyses were performed using chi-square tests.
RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for gallbladder cancer were 82.7 %, 44.4 %, 82.7 %, and 44 % using HRUS and 86.2 %, 22.2 %, 78.1 %, and 33.3 % using EUS. HRUS and EUS correctly diagnosed the stage in 13 and 12 patients. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for neoplastic polyps were 80 %, 80 %, 86 %, and 73 % using HRUS and 73 %, 85 %, 88 %, and 69 % using EUS. Single polyps (8/20 vs. 21/30), larger (1.0 ± 0.28 cm vs. 1.9 ± 0.85 cm) polyps, and older age (52.5 ± 13.2 vs. 66.1 ± 10.3 years) were common in neoplastic polyps (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Transabdominal HRUS showed comparable accuracy for diagnosing gallbladder cancer and differentiating neoplastic polyps compared with EUS. HRUS is also easy to use during our routine ultrasound examinations. KEY POINTS: • HRUS showed comparable diagnostic accuracy for GB cancer compared with EUS. • HRUS and EUS showed similar diagnostic accuracy for differentiating neoplastic polyps. • Single, larger polyps and older age were common in neoplastic polyps. • HRUS is less invasive compared with EUS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnosis; Endoscopic ultrasound; Gallbladder cancer; Gallbladder polyp; High-resolution ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27832311     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-016-4646-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  19 in total

Review 1.  Procedure-specific outcomes assessment for endoscopic ultrasonography.

Authors:  A Chak; G S Cooper
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  1999-10

2.  Comparison of conventional sonography, real-time compound sonography, tissue harmonic sonography, and tissue harmonic compound sonography of abdominal and pelvic lesions.

Authors:  Suna Ozhan Oktar; Cem Yücel; Hakan Ozdemir; Asli Ulutürk; Sedat Işik
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Differentiation of adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder from early-stage, wall-thickening-type gallbladder cancer using high-resolution ultrasound.

Authors:  Ijin Joo; Jae Young Lee; Jung Hoon Kim; Soo Jin Kim; Min A Kim; Joon Koo Han; Byung Ihn Choi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Differential diagnosis of polypoid lesions of the gallbladder by endoscopic ultrasonography.

Authors:  T Azuma; T Yoshikawa; T Araida; K Takasaki
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Clinical usefulness of endoscopic ultrasonography in the differential diagnosis of gallbladder wall thickening.

Authors:  Hong Joo Kim; Jung Ho Park; Dong Il Park; Yong Kyun Cho; Chong Il Sohn; Woo Kyu Jeon; Byung Ik Kim; Seon Hyeong Choi
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  High-resolution sonography for distinguishing neoplastic gallbladder polyps and staging gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Jung Hoon Kim; Jae Young Lee; Jee Hyun Baek; Hyo Won Eun; Young Jae Kim; Joon Koo Han; Byung Ihn Choi
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Can endoscopic ultrasonography differentiate nonneoplastic from neoplastic gallbladder polyps?

Authors:  Tomotaka Akatsu; Koichi Aiura; Motohide Shimazu; Masakazu Ueda; Go Wakabayashi; Minoru Tanabe; Shigeyuki Kawachi; Masaki Kitajima
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Differential diagnosis of small polypoid lesions of the gallbladder: the value of endoscopic ultrasonography.

Authors:  M Sugiyama; X Y Xie; Y Atomi; M Saito
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis: diagnostic performance of US, CT, and MRI for differentiation from gallbladder carcinoma.

Authors:  Eun Sun Lee; Jung Hoon Kim; Ijin Joo; Jae Young Lee; Joon Koo Han; Byung Ihn Choi
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2015-10

10.  Differentiating between adenomyomatosis and gallbladder cancer: revisiting a comparative study of high-resolution ultrasound, multidetector CT, and MR imaging.

Authors:  Sang Heum Bang; Jae Young Lee; Hyunsik Woo; Ijin Joo; Eun Sun Lee; Joon Koo Han; Byung Ihn Choi
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 3.500

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Cross-sectional Imaging of Gallbladder Carcinoma: An Update.

Authors:  Naveen Kalra; Pankaj Gupta; Manphool Singhal; Rajesh Gupta; Vikas Gupta; Radhika Srinivasan; Bhagwant R Mittal; Radha K Dhiman; Niranjan Khandelwal
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2018-04-30

2.  Risk stratification of gallbladder polyps larger than 10 mm using high-resolution ultrasonography and texture analysis.

Authors:  Tae Won Choi; Jung Hoon Kim; Sang Joon Park; Su Joa Ahn; Ijin Joo; Joon Koo Han
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  The efficacy of real-time colour Doppler flow imaging on endoscopic ultrasonography for differential diagnosis between neoplastic and non-neoplastic gallbladder polyps.

Authors:  Su Young Kim; Jae Hee Cho; Eui Joo Kim; Dong Hae Chung; Kun Kuk Kim; Yeon Ho Park; Yeon Suk Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Role of conventional ultrasonography in the diagnosis of gallbladder polypoid lesions.

Authors:  Shinji Okaniwa
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 1.314

5.  Surgical management of biliary malignancy.

Authors:  T Peter Kingham; Victoria G Aveson; Alice C Wei; Jason A Castellanos; Peter J Allen; Daniel P Nussbaum; Yinin Hu; Michael I D'Angelica
Journal:  Curr Probl Surg       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 1.909

6.  Indication and Usefulness of Bile Juice Cytology for Diagnosis of Gallbladder Cancer.

Authors:  Hiroshi Itsuki; Masahiro Serikawa; Tamito Sasaki; Yasutaka Ishii; Ken Tsushima; Yoshinari Furukawa; Yoshiaki Murakami; Koji Arihiro; Kazuaki Chayama
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 2.260

Review 7.  Transabdominal ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound for diagnosis of gallbladder polyps.

Authors:  Sarah Z Wennmacker; Mark P Lamberts; Marcello Di Martino; Joost Ph Drenth; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Cornelis Jhm van Laarhoven
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-08-15

Review 8.  Gallbladder cancer revisited: the evolving role of a radiologist.

Authors:  Anupama Ramachandran; Deep Narayan Srivastava; Kumble Seetharama Madhusudhan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 3.039

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.