Literature DB >> 24836007

Accuracy in dental medicine, a new way to measure trueness and precision.

Andreas Ender1, Albert Mehl2.   

Abstract

Reference scanners are used in dental medicine to verify a lot of procedures. The main interest is to verify impression methods as they serve as a base for dental restorations. The current limitation of many reference scanners is the lack of accuracy scanning large objects like full dental arches, or the limited possibility to assess detailed tooth surfaces. A new reference scanner, based on focus variation scanning technique, was evaluated with regards to highest local and general accuracy. A specific scanning protocol was tested to scan original tooth surface from dental impressions. Also, different model materials were verified. The results showed a high scanning accuracy of the reference scanner with a mean deviation of 5.3 ± 1.1 µm for trueness and 1.6 ± 0.6 µm for precision in case of full arch scans. Current dental impression methods showed much higher deviations (trueness: 20.4 ± 2.2 µm, precision: 12.5 ± 2.5 µm) than the internal scanning accuracy of the reference scanner. Smaller objects like single tooth surface can be scanned with an even higher accuracy, enabling the system to assess erosive and abrasive tooth surface loss. The reference scanner can be used to measure differences for a lot of dental research fields. The different magnification levels combined with a high local and general accuracy can be used to assess changes of single teeth or restorations up to full arch changes.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24836007      PMCID: PMC4183083          DOI: 10.3791/51374

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  15 in total

1.  A new method for the computer-aided evaluation of three-dimensional changes in gypsum materials.

Authors:  Ralph G Luthardt; Peter Kühmstedt; Michael H Walter
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.304

2.  Volume gain and stability of peri-implant tissue following bone and soft tissue augmentation: 1-year results from a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  David Schneider; Ueli Grunder; Andreas Ender; Christoph H F Hämmerle; Ronald E Jung
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 5.977

3.  Accuracy of dental digitizers.

Authors:  Simon T Vlaar; Jef M van der Zel
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.512

4.  Accuracy testing of a new intraoral 3D camera.

Authors:  A Mehl; A Ender; W Mörmann; T Attin
Journal:  Int J Comput Dent       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.883

5.  Dimensional changes of the ridge contour after socket preservation and buccal overbuilding: an animal study.

Authors:  Stefan Fickl; David Schneider; Otto Zuhr; Marc Hinze; Andreas Ender; Ronald E Jung; Markus B Hürzeler
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 8.728

6.  Accuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis.

Authors:  Marcelo Antonialli Del'Acqua; João Neudenir Arioli-Filho; Marco Antonio Compagnoni; Francisco de Assis Mollo
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions--an in-vitro study.

Authors:  A Ender; A Mehl
Journal:  Int J Comput Dent       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.883

8.  Influence of scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanning systems.

Authors:  A Ender; A Mehl
Journal:  Int J Comput Dent       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.883

9.  A new optical method to evaluate three-dimensional volume changes of alveolar contours: a methodological in vitro study.

Authors:  Simone I Windisch; Ronald E Jung; Irena Sailer; Stephan P Studer; Andreas Ender; Christoph H F Hämmerle
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2007-06-21       Impact factor: 5.977

10.  Application of intra-oral dental scanners in the digital workflow of implantology.

Authors:  Wicher J van der Meer; Frank S Andriessen; Daniel Wismeijer; Yijin Ren
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  10 in total

1.  In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods for obtaining quadrant dental impressions.

Authors:  Andreas Ender; Moritz Zimmermann; Thomas Attin; Albert Mehl
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Precision of guided scanning procedures for full-arch digital impressions in vivo.

Authors:  Moritz Zimmermann; Christina Koller; Moritz Rumetsch; Andreas Ender; Albert Mehl
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  A novel reference model for dental scanning system evaluation: analysis of five intraoral scanners.

Authors:  Irina Karakas-Stupar; Nicola Ursula Zitzmann; Tim Joda
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 1.989

4.  Evaluation of intraoral digital impressions for obtaining gingival contour in the esthetic zone: accuracy outcomes.

Authors:  Donghao Wei; Ping Di; Jiehua Tian; Yijiao Zhao; Ye Lin
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 5.  Intraoral Scanner Technologies: A Review to Make a Successful Impression.

Authors:  Raphaël Richert; Alexis Goujat; Laurent Venet; Gilbert Viguie; Stéphane Viennot; Philip Robinson; Jean-Christophe Farges; Michel Fages; Maxime Ducret
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 2.682

6.  Accuracy of four digital scanners according to scanning strategy in complete-arch impressions.

Authors:  Priscilla Medina-Sotomayor; Agustín Pascual-Moscardó; Isabel Camps
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A novel in vivo method to evaluate trueness of digital impressions.

Authors:  Emad A Albdour; Eman Shaheen; Myrthel Vranckx; Francesco Guido Mangano; Constantinus Politis; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 8.  Accuracy of Digital Dental Implants Impression Taking with Intraoral Scanners Compared with Conventional Impression Techniques: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies.

Authors:  María Isabel Albanchez-González; Jorge Cortés-Bretón Brinkmann; Jesús Peláez-Rico; Carlos López-Suárez; Verónica Rodríguez-Alonso; María Jesús Suárez-García
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Effect of Different CAD/CAM Milling and 3D Printing Digital Fabrication Techniques on the Accuracy of PMMA Working Models and Vertical Marginal Fit of PMMA Provisional Dental Prosthesis: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Marina Sidhom; Hanaa Zaghloul; Ihab El-Sayed Mosleh; Elzahraa Eldwakhly
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 4.329

Review 10.  Three-Dimensional Printing Technology in Orthodontics for Dental Models: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ioannis A Tsolakis; Sotiria Gizani; Nearchos Panayi; Georgios Antonopoulos; Apostolos I Tsolakis
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-23
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.