Literature DB >> 23641661

Influence of scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanning systems.

A Ender1, A Mehl.   

Abstract

The digital intraoral impression is a central part in today's CAD/CAM dentistry. With its possibilities, new treatment options for the patient is provided and the prosthetic workflow is accelerated. Nowadays, the major issue with intraoral scanning systems is to gain more accuracy especially for larger scan areas and to simplify clinical handling for the dentist. The aim of this study was to investigate different scanning strategies regardingtheir accuracy with full arch scans in an in-vitro study design. A reference master model was used for the digital impressions with the Lava COS, the Cerec Bluecam and a powderfree intraoral scanning system, Cadent iTero. The trueness and precision of each scanning protocol was measured. Lava COS provides the a trueness of 45.8 microm with the scanning protocol recommended from the manufacturer. A different scanning protocol shows significantly lower accuracy (trueness +/- 90.2 microm). Cerec Bluecam also benefits from an optimal scanning protocol with a trueness of +/- 23.3 microm compared to +/- 52.5 microm with a standard protocol. The powderfree impression system Cadent iTero shows also a high accurate full-arch scan with a trueness of +/- 35.0 microm and a precision of +/- 30.9 microm. With the current intraoral scanning systems, full arch dental impressions are possible with a high accuracy, if adequate scan strategies are used. The powderfree scanning system provides the same level of accuracy compared to scanning systems with surface pretreatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23641661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Dent        ISSN: 1463-4201            Impact factor:   1.883


  41 in total

1.  Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions.

Authors:  Cristina Zarauz; Arelhys Valverde; Francisco Martinez-Rus; Bassam Hassan; Guillermo Pradies
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods for obtaining quadrant dental impressions.

Authors:  Andreas Ender; Moritz Zimmermann; Thomas Attin; Albert Mehl
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Influence of conventional and digital intraoral impressions on the fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated all-ceramic crowns.

Authors:  S Berrendero; M P Salido; A Valverde; A Ferreiroa; G Pradíes
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-01-23       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  A new method for the evaluation of the accuracy of full-arch digital impressions in vitro.

Authors:  Jan-Frederik Güth; Daniel Edelhoff; Josef Schweiger; Christine Keul
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-10-10       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Can lithium disilicate ceramic crowns be fabricated on the basis of CBCT data?

Authors:  Ana Elisa Colle Kauling; Christine Keul; Kurt Erdelt; Jan Kühnisch; Jan-Frederik Güth
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Precision of guided scanning procedures for full-arch digital impressions in vivo.

Authors:  Moritz Zimmermann; Christina Koller; Moritz Rumetsch; Andreas Ender; Albert Mehl
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 1.938

7.  Accuracy of five intraoral scanners compared to indirect digitalization.

Authors:  Jan-Frederik Güth; Cornelius Runkel; Florian Beuer; Michael Stimmelmayr; Daniel Edelhoff; Christine Keul
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Accuracy in dental medicine, a new way to measure trueness and precision.

Authors:  Andreas Ender; Albert Mehl
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 1.355

9.  Fitting accuracy of zirconia single crowns produced via digital and conventional impressions-a clinical comparative study.

Authors:  Matthias Rödiger; Arthur Heinitz; Ralf Bürgers; Sven Rinke
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  In vitro assessment of the accuracy of digital impressions prepared using a single system for full-arch restorations on implants.

Authors:  Leonardo Ciocca; Roberto Meneghello; Carlo Monaco; Gianpaolo Savio; Lorenzo Scheda; Maria Rosaria Gatto; Paolo Baldissara
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 2.924

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.