Francisco A Folgar1, Glenn J Jaffe1, Gui-Shuang Ying2, Maureen G Maguire2, Cynthia A Toth3. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina. 2. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 3. Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina. Electronic address: cynthia.toth@dm.duke.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine agreement between spectral-domain (SD) and time-domain (TD) optical coherence tomography (OCT) image assessments by certified readers in eyes treated for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study within the Comparison of AMD Treatments Trials (CATT). PARTICIPANTS: During year 2 of CATT, 1213 pairs of SD OCT and TD OCT scans were compared from a subset of 384 eyes. METHODS: Masked readers independently graded OCT scans for presence of intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), and sub-retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) fluid and performed manual measurements of retinal, SRF, and subretinal tissue complex thicknesses at the foveal center. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Presence of fluid was evaluated with percent agreement, κ coefficients with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and McNemar tests. Thickness measurements were evaluated with mean difference (Δ) ±95% limits of agreement and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) with 95% CIs. RESULTS: Between SD OCT and TD OCT, agreement on presence of any fluid was 82% (κ = 0.46; 95% CI, 0.40-0.52), with 5% more SD OCT scans demonstrating fluid (P<0.001). Agreement on presence of SRF was 87% and sub-RPE fluid was 80%, with more SD OCT scans demonstrating fluid (both P < 0.001). Agreement on IRF was 73% (κ = 0.47; 95% CI, 0.42-0.52), with 6% more TD OCT scans demonstrating fluid (P < 0.001). Between SD OCT and TD OCT, mean thickness of the retina was Δ = 5±67 μm, SRF was Δ = 1.5±35 μm, and subretinal tissue complex was Δ = 5±86 μm. Thickness measurements were reproducible for retina (ICC = 0.84; 95% CI, 0.83-0.86), SRF (ICC = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.86-0.89), and subretinal tissue complex (ICC = 0.91; 95% CI, 0.89-0.92), with ≤25-μm difference in these measurements in 71%, 94%, and 61% of paired scans, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Agreement on fluid presence and manual thickness measurements between paired scans from each OCT modality was moderate, providing a reasonable basis to compare CATT results with future SD OCT-based trials. Fluid was detected 5% more frequently with SD OCT, which may increase frequency of fluid-based treatment. Lower-resolution and artifactual interpretation of dark areas as cystoid edema may explain the greater frequency of IRF detected with TD OCT.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To determine agreement between spectral-domain (SD) and time-domain (TD) optical coherence tomography (OCT) image assessments by certified readers in eyes treated for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study within the Comparison of AMD Treatments Trials (CATT). PARTICIPANTS: During year 2 of CATT, 1213 pairs of SD OCT and TD OCT scans were compared from a subset of 384 eyes. METHODS: Masked readers independently graded OCT scans for presence of intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), and sub-retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) fluid and performed manual measurements of retinal, SRF, and subretinal tissue complex thicknesses at the foveal center. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Presence of fluid was evaluated with percent agreement, κ coefficients with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and McNemar tests. Thickness measurements were evaluated with mean difference (Δ) ±95% limits of agreement and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) with 95% CIs. RESULTS: Between SD OCT and TD OCT, agreement on presence of any fluid was 82% (κ = 0.46; 95% CI, 0.40-0.52), with 5% more SD OCT scans demonstrating fluid (P<0.001). Agreement on presence of SRF was 87% and sub-RPE fluid was 80%, with more SD OCT scans demonstrating fluid (both P < 0.001). Agreement on IRF was 73% (κ = 0.47; 95% CI, 0.42-0.52), with 6% more TD OCT scans demonstrating fluid (P < 0.001). Between SD OCT and TD OCT, mean thickness of the retina was Δ = 5±67 μm, SRF was Δ = 1.5±35 μm, and subretinal tissue complex was Δ = 5±86 μm. Thickness measurements were reproducible for retina (ICC = 0.84; 95% CI, 0.83-0.86), SRF (ICC = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.86-0.89), and subretinal tissue complex (ICC = 0.91; 95% CI, 0.89-0.92), with ≤25-μm difference in these measurements in 71%, 94%, and 61% of paired scans, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Agreement on fluid presence and manual thickness measurements between paired scans from each OCT modality was moderate, providing a reasonable basis to compare CATT results with future SD OCT-based trials. Fluid was detected 5% more frequently with SD OCT, which may increase frequency of fluid-based treatment. Lower-resolution and artifactual interpretation of dark areas as cystoid edema may explain the greater frequency of IRF detected with TD OCT.
Authors: Teresa C Chen; Barry Cense; Mark C Pierce; Nader Nassif; B Hyle Park; Seok H Yun; Brian R White; Brett E Bouma; Guillermo J Tearney; Johannes F de Boer Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2005-12
Authors: Christopher Kai-shun Leung; Carol Yim-lui Cheung; Robert N Weinreb; Gary Lee; Dusheng Lin; Chi Pui Pang; Dennis S C Lam Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2008-04-30 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Francis Char DeCroos; Cynthia A Toth; Sandra S Stinnett; Cynthia S Heydary; Russell Burns; Glenn J Jaffe Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2012-08-28 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Francisco A Folgar; Cynthia A Toth; Francis Char DeCroos; Aniz Girach; Steve Pakola; Glenn J Jaffe Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2012-10-25 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Gui-shuang Ying; Jiayan Huang; Maureen G Maguire; Glenn J Jaffe; Juan E Grunwald; Cynthia Toth; Ebenezer Daniel; Michael Klein; Dante Pieramici; John Wells; Daniel F Martin Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2012-10-06 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Thomas A Ciulla; Thomas A Cuilla; Gui-Shuang Ying; Maureen G Maguire; Daniel F Martin; Glenn J Jaffe; Juan E Grunwald; Ebenezer Daniel; Cynthia A Toth Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2015-03-29 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Ebenezer Daniel; Gui-Shuang Ying; Benjamin J Kim; Cynthia A Toth; Frederick Ferris; Daniel F Martin; Juan E Grunwald; Glenn J Jaffe; Joshua L Dunaief; Wei Pan; Maureen G Maguire Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2018-11-23 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Michael Dietrich; Andrés Cruz-Herranz; Hao Yiu; Orhan Aktas; Alexander U Brandt; Hans-Peter Hartung; Ari Green; Philipp Albrecht Journal: BMJ Open Ophthalmol Date: 2016-11-06
Authors: Juan Lyn Ang; Sarah Ah-Moye; Leah N Kim; Vuong Nguyen; Adrian Hunt; Daniel Barthelmes; Mark C Gillies; Hemal Mehta Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2020-04-20 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: Avni P Finn; Maxwell Pistilli; Vincent Tai; Ebenezer Daniel; Gui-Shuang Ying; Maureen G Maguire; Juan E Grunwald; Daniel F Martin; Glenn J Jaffe; Cynthia A Toth Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2020-11-19 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Jason Q Core; Maxwell Pistilli; Ebenezer Daniel; Juan E Grunwald; Cynthia A Toth; Glenn J Jaffe; Peiying Hua; Daniel F Martin; Gui-Shuang Ying; Maureen G Maguire Journal: Ophthalmol Retina Date: 2021-06-11