Avni P Finn1, Maxwell Pistilli2, Vincent Tai3, Ebenezer Daniel2, Gui-Shuang Ying2, Maureen G Maguire2, Juan E Grunwald2, Daniel F Martin4, Glenn J Jaffe3, Cynthia A Toth5. 1. Northern California Retina Vitreous Associates, Mountain View, California, USA. 2. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA. 3. Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA. 4. Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA. 5. Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA. Electronic address: cynthia.toth@duke.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To identify precursors of macular atrophy (MA) and of fibrotic scar (FS) in eyes treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor through pixel-mapping analysis of baseline optical coherence tomography (OCT). METHODS: Design: Cross-sectional analysis. SETTING: Multicenter clinical trial. PATIENT POPULATION: 68 eyes from the Comparison of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials. INTERVENTION: Treatment with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The percentage of MA or FS pixels with each OCT feature at baseline, and the odds ratio for baseline pixels with an OCT feature to develop MA or FS. RESULTS: Retinal pigment epithelium atrophy and photoreceptor loss on OCT were highly predictive of MA at that location at years 2 and 5 (P < .0001), but accounted for only 22.5% of the ensuing atrophy at year 2 and less at year 5. Among pixels of MA at year 2, 78% were preceded by thick drusen, 54% by subretinal macular neovascularization (MNV), and 22.5% by no detectable OCT features. MNV, subretinal hyperreflective material, pigment epithelial detachment, intraretinal fluid, and sub-retinal pigment epithelium fluid were predictive of FS at that location (P values <.05). More than 75% of the pixels of FS at years 2 and 5 were preceded by pixels of baseline MNV. CONCLUSIONS: Most pixels of FS were preceded by components of neovascularization. Although one-quarter of MA was accounted for by pre-existing evidence of atrophy on OCT alone, the development of MA in areas of thick drusen, areas with and without subretinal MNV lesion, and areas without detectable OCT precursors argues that the development of MA is multifactorial and may follow, in part, a non-neovascular pathway.
PURPOSE: To identify precursors of macular atrophy (MA) and of fibrotic scar (FS) in eyes treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor through pixel-mapping analysis of baseline optical coherence tomography (OCT). METHODS: Design: Cross-sectional analysis. SETTING: Multicenter clinical trial. PATIENT POPULATION: 68 eyes from the Comparison of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials. INTERVENTION: Treatment with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The percentage of MA or FS pixels with each OCT feature at baseline, and the odds ratio for baseline pixels with an OCT feature to develop MA or FS. RESULTS: Retinal pigment epithelium atrophy and photoreceptor loss on OCT were highly predictive of MA at that location at years 2 and 5 (P < .0001), but accounted for only 22.5% of the ensuing atrophy at year 2 and less at year 5. Among pixels of MA at year 2, 78% were preceded by thick drusen, 54% by subretinal macular neovascularization (MNV), and 22.5% by no detectable OCT features. MNV, subretinal hyperreflective material, pigment epithelial detachment, intraretinal fluid, and sub-retinal pigment epithelium fluid were predictive of FS at that location (P values <.05). More than 75% of the pixels of FS at years 2 and 5 were preceded by pixels of baseline MNV. CONCLUSIONS: Most pixels of FS were preceded by components of neovascularization. Although one-quarter of MA was accounted for by pre-existing evidence of atrophy on OCT alone, the development of MA in areas of thick drusen, areas with and without subretinal MNV lesion, and areas without detectable OCT precursors argues that the development of MA is multifactorial and may follow, in part, a non-neovascular pathway.
Authors: Ebenezer Daniel; Wei Pan; Gui-Shuang Ying; Benjamin J Kim; Juan E Grunwald; Frederick L Ferris; Glenn J Jaffe; Cynthia A Toth; Daniel F Martin; Stuart L Fine; Maureen G Maguire Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2018-02-14 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Francis Char DeCroos; Cynthia A Toth; Sandra S Stinnett; Cynthia S Heydary; Russell Burns; Glenn J Jaffe Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2012-08-28 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Daniel F Martin; Maureen G Maguire; Stuart L Fine; Gui-shuang Ying; Glenn J Jaffe; Juan E Grunwald; Cynthia Toth; Maryann Redford; Frederick L Ferris Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2012-05-01 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Daniel F Martin; Maureen G Maguire; Gui-shuang Ying; Juan E Grunwald; Stuart L Fine; Glenn J Jaffe Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-04-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Maximilian Pfau; Philipp T Möller; Sandrine H Künzel; Leon von der Emde; Moritz Lindner; Sarah Thiele; Chantal Dysli; Jennifer Nadal; Matthias Schmid; Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg; Frank G Holz; Monika Fleckenstein Journal: Ophthalmol Retina Date: 2019-10-01
Authors: Glenn J Jaffe; Daniel F Martin; Cynthia A Toth; Ebenezer Daniel; Maureen G Maguire; Gui-Shuang Ying; Juan E Grunwald; Jiayan Huang Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2013-05-01 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Srinivas R Sadda; Robyn Guymer; Frank G Holz; Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg; Christine A Curcio; Alan C Bird; Barbara A Blodi; Ferdinando Bottoni; Usha Chakravarthy; Emily Y Chew; Karl Csaky; Ronald P Danis; Monika Fleckenstein; K Bailey Freund; Juan Grunwald; Carel B Hoyng; Glenn J Jaffe; Sandra Liakopoulos; Jordi M Monés; Daniel Pauleikhoff; Philip J Rosenfeld; David Sarraf; Richard F Spaide; Ramin Tadayoni; Adnan Tufail; Sebastian Wolf; Giovanni Staurenghi Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2017-11-02 Impact factor: 12.079