Literature DB >> 24832608

Effects of pitch on auditory number comparisons.

Jamie I D Campbell1, Florence Scheepers.   

Abstract

Three experiments investigated interactions between auditory pitch and the numerical quantities represented by spoken English number words. In Experiment 1, participants heard a pair of sequential auditory numbers in the range zero to ten. They pressed a left-side or right-side key to indicate if the second number was lower or higher in numerical value. The vocal pitches of the two numbers either ascended or descended so that pitch change was congruent or incongruent with number change. The error rate was higher when pitch and number were incongruent relative to congruent trials. The distance effect on RT (i.e., slower responses for numerically near than far number pairs) occurred with pitch ascending but not descending. In Experiment 2, to determine if these effects depended on the left/right spatial mapping of responses, participants responded "yes" if the second number was higher and "no" if it was lower. Again, participants made more number comparison errors when number and pitch were incongruent, but there was no distance × pitch order effect. To pursue the latter, in Experiment 3, participants were tested with response buttons assigned left-smaller and right-larger ("normal" spatial mapping) or the reverse mapping. Participants who received normal mapping first presented a distance effect with pitch ascending but not descending as in Experiment 1, whereas participants who received reverse mapping first presented a distance effect with pitch descending but not ascending. We propose that the number and pitch dimensions of stimuli both activated spatial representations and that strategy shifts from quantity comparison to order processing were induced by spatial incongruities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24832608     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-014-0571-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  23 in total

1.  Spatial representation of pitch height: the SMARC effect.

Authors:  Elena Rusconi; Bonnie Kwan; Bruno L Giordano; Carlo Umiltà; Brian Butterworth
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2005-05-31

2.  Numerical order and quantity processing in number comparison.

Authors:  Eva Turconi; Jamie I D Campbell; Xavier Seron
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2006-01

3.  Time (also) flies from left to right.

Authors:  Julio Santiago; Juan Lupiáñez; Elvira Pérez; María Jesús Funes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-06

4.  Confidence intervals in repeated-measures designs: The number of observations principle.

Authors:  Jerzy Jarmasz; Justin G Hollands
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2009-06

5.  Compatibility effects between sound frequency and tactile elevation.

Authors:  Valeria Occelli; Charles Spence; Massimiliano Zampini
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 1.837

6.  Effects of laterality and pitch height of an auditory accessory stimulus on horizontal response selection: the Simon effect and the SMARC effect.

Authors:  Akio Nishimura; Kazuhiko Yokosawa
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-08

7.  Horizontal spatial representations of time: evidence for the STEARC effect.

Authors:  Masami Ishihara; Peter E Keller; Yves Rossetti; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2007-12-23       Impact factor: 4.027

8.  Mental representation: what can pitch tell us about the distance effect?

Authors:  Roi Cohen Kadosh; Warren Brodsky; Michal Levin; Avishai Henik
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2007-12-23       Impact factor: 4.027

9.  Time required for judgements of numerical inequality.

Authors:  R S Moyer; T K Landauer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1967-09-30       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 10.  Beyond the number domain.

Authors:  Jessica F Cantlon; Michael L Platt; Elizabeth M Brannon
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 20.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.