Literature DB >> 18387580

Mental representation: what can pitch tell us about the distance effect?

Roi Cohen Kadosh1, Warren Brodsky, Michal Levin, Avishai Henik.   

Abstract

Reaction time (RT) profiles for comparing magnitudes (e.g., numbers, physical sizes) are similar - the larger the difference between the compared stimuli, the shorter the RT (distance effect). Nevertheless, it is unclear whether such correspondence is due to similar, two-dimensional, linear mental representations of magnitudes. In contrast, pitch perception has a more complex, two-dimensional, helical representation. This study examined whether comparisons of music pitches are similar to other magnitude response functions. Experiment 1 employed a comparison task, resulting in an RT profile identical to that obtained when comparing other magnitudes. In contrast, Experiment 2 employed a discrimination task, resulting in RTs that matched the helical representation and were dissociated from the classical distance effect. Experiment 3 replicated the results of Experiment 1 using a comparison task with different stimuli and intervals. These findings imply that the distance effect under comparison tasks might reflect a general sensorimotor transformation, rather than mental representation per se.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18387580     DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  15 in total

1.  Implicit chord processing and motor representation in pianists.

Authors:  Pietro Davide Trimarchi; Claudio Luzzatti
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-06-17

2.  Evidence for distinct magnitude systems for symbolic and non-symbolic number.

Authors:  Delphine Sasanguie; Bert De Smedt; Bert Reynvoet
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-12-26

3.  The distance effect on discrimination ability and response bias during magnitude comparison in a go/no-go task.

Authors:  Ilgım Hepdarcan; Merve Bulut; Ezgi Palaz; Seda Can; Seda Dural
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Developmental trajectories of magnitude processing and interference control: an FMRI study.

Authors:  Guilherme Wood; Anja Ischebeck; Florian Koppelstaetter; Thaddaeus Gotwald; Liane Kaufmann
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Effects of pitch on auditory number comparisons.

Authors:  Jamie I D Campbell; Florence Scheepers
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-05-16

6.  Nonsymbolic and symbolic representations of null numerosity.

Authors:  Rut Zaks-Ohayon; Michal Pinhas; Joseph Tzelgov
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-04-11

7.  False approximations of the approximate number system?

Authors:  Titia Gebuis; Maarten J van der Smagt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Automatic and intentional number processing both rely on intact right parietal cortex: a combined FMRI and neuronavigated TMS study.

Authors:  Roi Cohen Kadosh; Nina Bien; Alexander T Sack
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  An ERP study of the processing of common and decimal fractions: how different they are.

Authors:  Li Zhang; Qi Wang; Chongde Lin; Cody Ding; Xinlin Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Comparing the neural distance effect derived from the non-symbolic comparison and the same-different task.

Authors:  Karolien Smets; Titia Gebuis; Bert Reynvoet
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.