Literature DB >> 2486189

Estimation and comparison of changes in the presence of informative right censoring: conditional linear model.

M C Wu1, K R Bailey.   

Abstract

A general linear regression model for the usual least squares estimated rate of change (slope) on censoring time is described as an approximation to account for informative right censoring in estimating and comparing changes of a continuous variable in two groups. Two noniterative estimators for the group slope means, the linear minimum variance unbiased (LMVUB) estimator and the linear minimum mean squared error (LMMSE) estimator, are proposed under this conditional model. In realistic situations, we illustrate that the LMVUB and LMMSE estimators, derived under a simple linear regression model, are quite competitive compared to the pseudo maximum likelihood estimator (PMLE) derived by modeling the censoring probabilities. Generalizations to polynomial response curves and general linear models are also described.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2486189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  55 in total

1.  AN APPROACH FOR JOINTLY MODELING MULTIVARIATE LONGITUDINAL MEASUREMENTS AND DISCRETE TIME-TO-EVENT DATA.

Authors:  Paul S Albert; Joanna H Shih
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.083

2.  Slope Estimation of Covariates that Influence Renal Outcome following Renal Transplant Adjusting for Informative Right Censoring.

Authors:  Miran A Jaffa; Ayad A Jaffa; Stuart R Lipsitz
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.404

3.  Mixtures of varying coefficient models for longitudinal data with discrete or continuous nonignorable dropout.

Authors:  Joseph W Hogan; Xihong Lin; Benjamin Herman
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Simultaneous modelling of survival and longitudinal data with an application to repeated quality of life measures.

Authors:  Donglin Zeng; Jianwen Cai
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.588

5.  Use of OSWALD for analyzing longitudinal data with informative dropout.

Authors:  Amy E Begley; Gong Tang; Sati Mazumdar; Patricia R Houck; John Scott; Benoit H Mulsant; Charles F Reynolds
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  Evaluating the quality of longitudinal statistical applications in original publications on Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Chengjie Xiong; Yuxiao Tang; Gerald van Belle; J Philip Miller; Lenore J Launer; John C Morris
Journal:  Neuroepidemiology       Date:  2008-03-11       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Joint multiple imputation for longitudinal outcomes and clinical events that truncate longitudinal follow-up.

Authors:  Bo Hu; Liang Li; Tom Greene
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Bayesian latent-class mixed-effect hybrid models for dyadic longitudinal data with non-ignorable dropouts.

Authors:  Jaeil Ahn; Suyu Liu; Wenyi Wang; Ying Yuan
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Imputation-based strategies for clinical trial longitudinal data with nonignorable missing values.

Authors:  Xiaowei Yang; Jinhui Li; Steven Shoptaw
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Evaluation of quality of life in a clinical trial with nonrandom dropout: the effect of epoetin alfa in anemic cancer patients.

Authors:  D L Fairclough; D D Gagnon; M J Zagari; N Marschner; M Dicato
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.