Literature DB >> 28239239

Identifying subgroups of enhanced predictive accuracy from longitudinal biomarker data using tree-based approaches: applications to fetal growth.

Jared C Foster1, Danping Liu1, Paul S Albert1, Aiyi Liu1.   

Abstract

Longitudinal monitoring of biomarkers is often helpful for predicting disease or a poor clinical outcome. In this paper, We consider the prediction of both large and small-for-gestational-age births using longitudinal ultrasound measurements, and attempt to identify subgroups of women for whom prediction is more (or less) accurate, should they exist. We propose a tree-based approach to identifying such subgroups, and a pruning algorithm which explicitly incorporates a desired type-I error rate, allowing us to control the risk of false discovery of subgroups. The proposed methods are applied to data from the Scandinavian Fetal Growth Study, and are evaluated via simulations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fetal Growth; Personalized Medicine; Prediction; Recursive Partitioning; Shared Random Effects Models

Year:  2016        PMID: 28239239      PMCID: PMC5321661          DOI: 10.1111/rssa.12182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc        ISSN: 0964-1998            Impact factor:   2.483


  15 in total

Review 1.  A Bayesian approach to subgroup identification.

Authors:  James O Berger; Xiaojing Wang; Lei Shen
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.051

2.  Subgroup identification from randomized clinical trial data.

Authors:  Jared C Foster; Jeremy M G Taylor; Stephen J Ruberg
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Predicting large fetuses at birth: do multiple ultrasound examinations and longitudinal statistical modelling improve prediction?

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Sungduk Kim; Jagteshwar Grewal; Paul S Albert
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 3.980

4.  Subgroup analysis and other (mis)uses of baseline data in clinical trials.

Authors:  S F Assmann; S J Pocock; L E Enos; L E Kasten
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-03-25       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Large-scale randomized evidence: large, simple trials and overviews of trials.

Authors:  R Peto; R Collins; R Gray
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  A linear mixed model for predicting a binary event from longitudinal data under random effects misspecification.

Authors:  Paul S Albert
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  A robust method for estimating optimal treatment regimes.

Authors:  Baqun Zhang; Anastasios A Tsiatis; Eric B Laber; Marie Davidian
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Analysis and interpretation of treatment effects in subgroups of patients in randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  S Yusuf; J Wittes; J Probstfield; H A Tyroler
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-07-03       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  A regression tree approach to identifying subgroups with differential treatment effects.

Authors:  Wei-Yin Loh; Xu He; Michael Man
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Pre-pregnancy risk factors of small-for-gestational age births among parous women in Scandinavia.

Authors:  L S Bakketeig; G Jacobsen; H J Hoffman; G Lindmark; P Bergsjø; K Molne; J Rødsten
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.636

View more
  3 in total

1.  Discriminatory capacity of prenatal ultrasound measures for large-for-gestational-age birth: A Bayesian approach to ROC analysis using placement values.

Authors:  Soutik Ghosal; Zhen Chen
Journal:  Stat Biosci       Date:  2021-06-05

2.  Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Masked Hypertension Among Children With Chronic Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Sunjae Bae; Joshua A Samuels; Joseph T Flynn; Mark M Mitsnefes; Susan L Furth; Bradley A Warady; Derek K Ng
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 9.897

3.  Who can tolerate a marginal kidney? Predicting survival after deceased donor kidney transplant by donor-recipient combination.

Authors:  Sunjae Bae; Allan B Massie; Alvin G Thomas; Gahyun Bahn; Xun Luo; Kyle R Jackson; Shane E Ottmann; Daniel C Brennan; Niraj M Desai; Josef Coresh; Dorry L Segev; Jacqueline M Garonzik Wang
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2018-07-14       Impact factor: 8.086

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.