The unique active site of flavo-diiron proteins (FDPs) consists of a nonheme diiron-carboxylate site proximal to a flavin mononucleotide (FMN) cofactor. FDPs serve as the terminal components for reductive scavenging of dioxygen or nitric oxide to combat oxidative or nitrosative stress in bacteria, archaea, and some protozoan parasites. Nitric oxide is reduced to nitrous oxide by the four-electron reduced (FMNH2-Fe(II)Fe(II)) active site. In order to clarify the nitric oxide reductase mechanism, we undertook a multispectroscopic presteady-state investigation, including the first Mössbauer spectroscopic characterization of diiron redox intermediates in FDPs. A new transient intermediate was detected and determined to be an antiferromagnetically coupled diferrous-dinitrosyl (S = 0, [{FeNO}(7)]2) species. This species has an exchange energy, J ≥ 40 cm(-1) (JS1 ° S2), which is consistent with a hydroxo or oxo bridge between the two irons. The results show that the nitric oxide reductase reaction proceeds through successive formation of diferrous-mononitrosyl (S = ½, Fe(II){FeNO}(7)) and the S = 0 diferrous-dinitrosyl species. In the rate-determining process, the diferrous-dinitrosyl converts to diferric (Fe(III)Fe(III)) and by inference N2O. The proximal FMNH2 then rapidly rereduces the diferric site to diferrous (Fe(II)Fe(II)), which can undergo a second 2NO → N2O turnover. This pathway is consistent with previous results on the same deflavinated and flavinated FDP, which detected N2O as a product (Hayashi Biochemistry 2010, 49, 7040). Our results do not support other proposed mechanisms, which proceed either via "super-reduction" of [{FeNO}(7)]2 by FMNH2 or through Fe(II){FeNO}(7) directly to a diferric-hyponitrite intermediate. The results indicate that an S = 0 [{FeNO}(7)}]2 complex is a proximal precursor to N-N bond formation and N-O bond cleavage to give N2O and that this conversion can occur without redox participation of the FMN cofactor.
The unique active site of flavo-diiron proteins (FDPs) consists of a nonheme diiron-carboxylate site proximal to a flavin mononucleotide (FMN) cofactor. FDPs serve as the terminal components for reductive scavenging of dioxygen or nitric oxide to combat oxidative or nitrosative stress in bacteria, archaea, and some protozoan parasites. Nitric oxide is reduced to nitrous oxide by the four-electron reduced (FMNH2-Fe(II)Fe(II)) active site. In order to clarify the nitric oxide reductase mechanism, we undertook a multispectroscopic presteady-state investigation, including the first Mössbauer spectroscopic characterization of diiron redox intermediates in FDPs. A new transient intermediate was detected and determined to be an antiferromagnetically coupled diferrous-dinitrosyl (S = 0, [{FeNO}(7)]2) species. This species has an exchange energy, J ≥ 40 cm(-1) (JS1 ° S2), which is consistent with a hydroxo or oxo bridge between the two irons. The results show that the nitric oxide reductase reaction proceeds through successive formation of diferrous-mononitrosyl (S = ½, Fe(II){FeNO}(7)) and the S = 0 diferrous-dinitrosyl species. In the rate-determining process, the diferrous-dinitrosyl converts to diferric (Fe(III)Fe(III)) and by inference N2O. The proximal FMNH2 then rapidly rereduces the diferric site to diferrous (Fe(II)Fe(II)), which can undergo a second 2NO → N2O turnover. This pathway is consistent with previous results on the same deflavinated and flavinated FDP, which detected N2O as a product (Hayashi Biochemistry 2010, 49, 7040). Our results do not support other proposed mechanisms, which proceed either via "super-reduction" of [{FeNO}(7)]2 by FMNH2 or through Fe(II){FeNO}(7) directly to a diferric-hyponitrite intermediate. The results indicate that an S = 0 [{FeNO}(7)}]2 complex is a proximal precursor to N-N bond formation and N-O bond cleavage to give N2O and that this conversion can occur without redox participation of the FMN cofactor.
Flavo-diiron
proteins (FDPs) are widespread in microaerophilic
and anaerobic microorganisms, including bacteria, archaea, and a few
protozoan parasites.[1−10] The accumulated genetic and biochemical evidence indicates that
FDPs are the terminal components of a reductive dioxygen (O2) and/or anaerobic nitric oxide (NO) scavenging pathways. The FDP-catalyzed
four-electron reduction of O2 to water (O2R
activity) or the two-electron reduction of two NO molecules to nitrous
oxide (NOR activity) protects against accumulation of toxic reactive
oxygen or nitrogen species.FDPs are soluble cytoplasmic enzymes
with a “head-to-tail”
homodimer as the minimum functional unit.[3,11,12] The homodimer contains two symmetrically
disposed active sites ∼40 Å apart. Each active site consists
of a nonheme diiron cluster (Fe1–Fe2 distance 3.2–3.6
Å), and a flavin mononucleotide (FMN) cofactor located ∼4
Å from the diiron site across the subunit interface, as diagrammed
in Scheme 1.[11−13] In almost all structurally
characterized FDPs, each iron of the diiron site contains two histidine
ligands and a terminal monodentate carboxylate ligand from either
aspartate or glutamate. A bridging bidentate carboxylate from an aspartate
residue and a protonated solvent ligand complete the diiron coordination
sphere, resulting in two five-coordinate irons. One FDP structure
contains a terminal solvent in place of a His ligand, which is rotated
away from Fe2.[14] Site-directed mutations
show that this substitution has surprisingly minor effects on structure
and activities.[13] Open or solvent-occupied
sixth coordination sites trans to His ligands on each iron are oriented
toward a buried pocket, which in some structures contains solvent
or other exogenous small molecules. The relatively nonpolar O2 or NO diffuse into this pocket and presumably bind to these
labile coordination sites during O2R or NOR turnover. Under
aerobic conditions, the active site of FDPs is in the FMNox–FeIIIFeIII oxidation state (FDPox), but the diferrous oxidation state is necessary for substrate
reduction.[15,16] At least one function of the
FMN is to funnel reducing equivalents from exogenous electron donors
to the diiron site. The fully reduced active site, FMNH2–FeIIFeII (FDPred) thus has
the capacity to deliver up to four electrons to either one O2 or four NOs during O2R or NOR turnover.
Scheme 1
Here, we address the NOR mechanism of FDPs, proposals
for which
are shown in Scheme 2.[3,17,18] All three proposed mechanisms, labeled diFeNO,
sr, and hyp, initiate from a diferrous-mononitrosyl, FeII{FeNO}7, which forms as a stable species upon addition
of less than 1 equiv of NO per diferrous site.[16,19] ({FeNO}7 is the Enemark–Feltham notation for ferrous-nitrosyl.[20]) diFeNO and sr both propose that binding of
a second NO (step 1diFeNO,sr) leads to a diferrous-dinitrosyl ([{FeNO}7]2) intermediate. Steps 2diFeNO and 2sr represent
alternative rate-limiting reactions of the diferrous-dinitrosyl. In
step 2diFeNO, the two coordinated NOs react to form an N–N
bond, are protonated, and lose the elements of water, thereby generating
N2O and a diferric site. In the alternative rate-limiting
step, 2sr, FMNH2 “super-reduces” the [{FeNO}7]2 to a highly reactive
diferrous-dinitroxyl ([{Fe(H)NO}8]2), which
decays to diferrous (FeII·FeII) with release
of N2O. The hyp mechanism[18] proposes
that the second NO reacts directly with the {FeNO}7 center
of FeII{FeNO}7 (step 1hyp), leading to a formally
diferric-O,N-semibridging hyponitrite intermediate (FeIII–(N2O22–)–FeIII), which decays in the rate-limiting step to diferric with
release of N2O. Of the three proposed mechanisms, only
sr requires redox participation of the FMN cofactor prior to or at
the rate-limiting step leading to N2O.
Scheme 2
In order to separate
the functions of the FMN and the diiron site,
the reaction of NO with the diferrous deflavinated (deflavo) FDP from Thermotoga maritima (Tm) was examined.[16] The results were consistent with reaction of
the FeII{FeNO}7 with a second NO leading to
parallel productive (i.e., N2O generating) and unproductive
pathways. These results suggested that at least a portion of the diiron
sites are capable of catalyzing N2O formation in the absence
of FMN, which is consistent with either mechanisms diFeNO or hyp but
not with mechanism sr in Scheme 2. However,
more recent studies on a synthetic diferrous-dinitrosyl complex seem
to support the feasibility of “super-reduction” in mechanism
sr.[21] The observation of an unusually low
N–O stretching frequency in the FeII{FeNO}7 complex of Tm FDP led to the proposal that the coordinated NO is
activated for reaction with a second NO, which would seem to support
mechanism hyp.[19]In order to clarify
these mechanistic ambiguities, we have undertaken
rapid kinetics studies to trap and characterize intermediates in the
FDP NOR reaction. In addition, we have investigated the ultimate oxidation
state of the Tm FDPred active site upon reaction with excess
NO. Some characteristic spectroscopic signals have proven useful for
these studies. Mononuclear nonheme ferrous nitrosyls ({FeNO}7) with weak field O,N ligands typically show an S = 3/2 ground spin state exhibiting axial g ∼ 4.0, 2.0 electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR)
spectra and characteristic ligand-to-metal charge transfer UV–visible
(UV–vis) absorptions at ∼650, 450, and 330 nm with ε450 nm ∼1000 M–1 cm–1.[16,19,22−25] The diferrous mononitrosyl, FeII{FeNO}7, in
FDP shows this characteristic UV–vis absorption but exhibits
an S = 1/2 EPR spectrum (g ∼ 2.3, 1.9) due to antiferromagnetic coupling between
the high spin FeII (S = 2) and the S = 3/2 {FeNO}7.[16,19] Numerous studies of nonheme iron synthetic complexes and proteins
have established a unique and characteristic combination of 57Fe Mössbauer isomer shift and quadrupole splitting values
that unambiguously identify S = 3/2 {FeNO}7 species with N/O-ligand coordination spheres.[23,26−30]57Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy can furthermore distinguish
between magnetically coupled versus isolated {FeNO}7 centers[28,31,32] but has not previously been applied
to the nitric oxide reactions of FDPs. The three flavin redox states,
FMNox, FMNH (semiquinone), and FMNH2, have distinctive
and characteristic visible absorption spectra.[15,33] We have used all of these spectroscopic methods to identify intermediates
in reactions of NO with Tm FDPred, including the first
Mössbauer spectral characterizations of diiron redox intermediates
during catalysis in this class of proteins. Our results clarify the
roles of the FMN and the diiron site in NOR catalysis and can be used
to discriminate among the mechanistic possibilities in Scheme 2.
Experimental Procedures
Reagents
and General Procedures
Reagents and buffers
were of the highest grade commercially available. All reagents, protein,
and media solutions were prepared using water purified with a Millipore
ultrapurification system to a resistivity of 18 MΩ to minimize
trace metal ion contamination. Unless otherwise noted, the buffer
used for all experiments was 50 mM 3-(N-morpholino)-propanesulfonic
acid (MOPS) pH 7.3, which is hereafter referred to as buffer. Protein
concentrations were determined by the bicinchonic acid assay (Pierce).
Protein iron and FMN contents were determined using a standard ferrozine
assay[34] and a ε461nm value
of 12 000 M–1 cm–1, respectively,
the latter of which was also used to determine protein active-site
concentrations.[13]
Proteins
The expression,
purification, and flavin enrichment
of recombinant Tm FDP was performed as previously described.[13] TmNADH/rubredoxin oxidoreductase (NROR),[10]Desulfovibrio vulgaris rubredoxin (Rd)[35] and D. vulgaris FDP[36] were
obtained as previously described. For 57Fe enrichment of
Tm FDP, a 35 mL culture of the Tm FDP expression strain was grown
in Luria–Bertani broth containing 100 μg/mL ampicillin
overnight at 37 °C. A 5 mL portion of this overnight culture
was used to inoculate 1 L of M9 medium supplemented with 2 g of N-Z
amine (Quality biological, Inc.), 0.05% glucose, and 0.5% glycerol.
The culture was incubated with shaking at 37 °C for 3–4
h to an OD600nm of 0.6–1.0. Protein expression was
then induced by addition of 200 mg/L arabinose, followed by 1 mg of 57Fe (Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Inc.), which had been
dissolved in 100 μL of aqua regia. The induced, 57Fe-treated culture was allowed to grow overnight with shaking at
room temperature. Isolation, purification, and flavin enrichment of
the 57Fe-enriched protein followed the procedures described
for the natural isotope abundance Tm FDP.
Preparation of Tm FDPred
A modified version
of a previously described procedure was used.[19] All manipulations were carried out at room temperature. All Tm FDP
concentrations are listed on a diiron site basis. Tm FDPox solutions (60–2000 μM) in buffer were placed in septum-capped
vials and deoxygenated by vacuum/N2 gas purge cycles on
a Schlenk line before transfer to an anaerobic N2 gas-filled
glovebox (Omnilab system, Vacuum Atmosphere Inc.). All further manipulations
were performed in this glovebox at room temperature. Tm FDPox was reduced by addition of 2.2 mol equiv of NADH per FDP active
site in the presence of 500 nM NROR and 5 μM Rd. Under these
conditions, the FMN in Tm FDP was immediately reduced to the semiquinone
state, as verified by UV–vis absorption (see the Results and Discussion section). Overnight reduction under
these condition resulted in the four-electron reduced yellow-colored
Tm FDPred. For the RFQ Mössbauer samples, the ∼1
mM Tm FDPred solutions were centrifuged at 14 000g for 10 min to remove a precipitate. The cleared supernatant
solutions were then loaded into the RFQ apparatus, as described below.
Nitric Oxide Stock Solutions
Purified nitric oxide
gas was prepared by bubbling NO gas (Praxair, Inc.) through ∼50
mL of 10 M KOH in a septum-sealed 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask for 10–15
min. The Erlenmeyer flask was then transferred into the anaerobic
glovebox. Twenty milliliter headspace vials (Kimble Chase, LLC) were
equilibrated in the glovebox overnight, after which the vials were
septum-sealed. Immediately prior to use, a septum-sealed headspace
vial was evacuated using a 50 mL syringe, and approximately 20 mL
of NO gas from the headspace of the Erlenmeyer flask was transferred
via syringe into the evacuated vial. For ∼1.8 mM NO stock solutions,
15 mL of anaerobic buffer at room temperature was injected into the
NO gas-filled headspace vial. The analogous procedure was used to
prepare ∼3 mM NO stock solutions, except that the NO-filled
headspace vial was cooled to 4 °C, and 15 mL of buffer chilled
to 4 °C was injected into the chilled vial. The concentrations
of NO in the stock solutions were quantified by adding a 25 μL
aliquot to a buffered solution containing 100 μM NADH, 5 μM
Rd, 500 nM NROR, and 2 μM D. vulgaris FDP. (The D. vulgaris FDP was used
because it consumes NO much more rapidly than does Tm FDP.[13,36]) The concentration of NADH consumed upon the addition of NO was
determined from ΔA340nm (ε340nm = 6200 M–1 cm–1)
using an Ocean Optics USB 2000 spectrophotometer. The NO concentrations
of the stock solutions were calculated from the NADH consumed and
the 2NO/NADH stoichiometry.[13]
PROLI-NONOate
Stock Solutions and Quantification of NO Delivery
Equivalents
Stock solutions of disodium 1-[(2-carboxylato)pyrrolidin-1-yl]diazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate
(PROLI-NONOate) (Cayman Chemical Company) were prepared by dissolving
10 mg of PROLI-NONOate in 0.5–1 mL of deoxygenated 10 mM sodium
hydroxide. These stock solutions were stored in the anaerobic glovebox
for no longer than 24 h prior to use. Over this time period, the PROLI-NONOate
is stable in the hydroxide stock solutions and can be quantified using
a ε252nm value of 8400 M–1 cm–1.[37] At pH 7.4, PROLI-NONOate
releases 2 mol of NO per 1 mol of NONOate with a half-time of 6 s
at 22 °C.[37] In our hands, the stoichiometry
of NO released appeared to vary somewhat among stock solutions. The
NO-delivery equivalents in the NONOate stock solutions were therefore
quantified by reaction of the released NO with FeIIEDTA.
A 50 mM stock of FeIIEDTA was prepared by mixing a 1:1
ratio (v/v) of 1 M EDTA, pH 7, with 100 mM FeII(NH4)2(SO4)2·6 H2O. Aliquots of 5–20 μL of the PROLI-NONOate stock solution
were diluted into 1 mL of buffer, and after 30–60 s, a 2–10-fold
molar excess of FeIIEDTA was added. (It was found empirically
that addition of the stock NONOate directly to FeIIEDTA
solutions apparently inhibited the NONOate decay.) The concentration
of the resulting FeIIEDTA–NO complex was determined
using a ε440nm value of 900 M–1 cm–1.[16]
Manual Titration
of FDPred with NO for Mössbauer
Spectroscopy
All manipulations were carried out in the anaerobic
glovebox. A 3200 μL volume of 500 μM Tm FDPred was prepared as described above. A 400 μL portion of thisTm FDPred solution was pipetted into a Mössbauer
cup and frozen in a cold well at 77 K. The remaining Tm FDPred solution was used for the NO titration experiments. For the titration
experiments, two stock PROLI-NONOate solutions were prepared and quantified
as described above to contain either 8 or 40 mM NO delivery equivalents.
To prepare Mössbauer samples containing 0.3, 0.6, and 0.9 equiv
of NO, the appropriate volumes (7.5–22.5 μL) of the PROLI-NONOate
stock solution containing 8 mM NO delivery equivalents were added
to 400 μL samples of 500 μM 57Fe-enriched Tm
FDPred. The samples were incubated at room temperature
for 5 min, transferred to Mössbauer cups, and frozen in a liquid
N2-cooled cold well. The Mössbauer cups containing
the frozen samples were removed from the glovebox and stored at 77
K. The same procedure was followed for titrations with higher NO concentrations
except that the PROLI-NONOate stock solution containing 40 mM NO delivery
equivalents was used.
Stopped-Flow Spectrophotometry
Stopped-flow
UV–vis
absorption spectrophotometry was performed using an SX20 stopped-flow
spectrometer (Applied Photophysics, Ltd.). Spectral time courses were
collected using a photodiode array (PDA) detector. The optical path
length through the sample cell was either 1 cm or, for more concentrated
protein solutions, 0.2 cm. All anaerobic solutions were prepared in
the glovebox and pulled into a 5 mL Luer-slip syringe and needle (Fisher
Scientific) that had been equilibrated in the glovebox overnight.
These loaded syringes were then transferred from the glovebox, and
the solutions were injected through the loading port into the drive
syringe using the protocol described in the SX20 instruction manual.
The stopped-flow circuit was made anaerobic by filling the drive syringes
and the circuit with an anaerobic solution of 700 μM NADH, 500
nM NROR, 5 μM Rd, and 2 μM D. vulgaris FDP. This system is an efficient O2 scavenger.[36] The circuit was incubated with thisO2-scaveging mixture for at least 1 h and then flushed with deoxygenated
water prior to loading the anaerobic reactant solutions. 2.5 mL drive
syringes (Hamilton Company, USA) were used for 1:1 (v/v) mixing and
a 2.5 mL/250 μL drive syringe combination was used for 10:1
(v/v) mixing. The Tm FPDred solutions were always loaded
into a 2.5 mL drive syringe, and 1.8 mM NO solutions were loaded into
the other drive syringe. The solutions in both drive syringes and
the optical cell were cooled to 2–3 °C prior to stopped-flow
mixing. Reactions with substoichiometric NO used 1:1 (v/v) mixing
of a ∼2 mM anaerobic solution of Tm FDPred with
a ∼1.8 mM NO solution. Reactions with excess NO used 1:1 (v/v)
mixing of 130–160 μM Tm FDPred with a ∼1.8
mM NO solution. Spectra of the starting Tm FDPred under
these conditions were obtained by stopped-flow mixing with anaerobic
buffer in place of the NO solutions. The NO concentrations immediately
after stopped-flow mixing were quantified using the same drive syringe-loaded
NO solution but stopped-flow mixed with 1–5 mM FeIIEDTA in place of the protein. The FeIIEDTA was found to
react with NO to form FeEDTA–NO quantitatively within the mixing
dead time and to remain stable for at least several minutes.[23] The FeEDTA–NO was quantified using a
ε440nm value of 900 M–1 cm–1 with 440 nm monochromatic (2 nm bandwidth) and photomultiplier
tube detector in order to avoid NO photodissociation. The concentrations
of FDP and NO immediately after mixing are listed in the figure captions.
Rapid Freeze-Quench
A KinTek RFQ-3 rapid freeze-quench
(RFQ) instrument (KinTek Corp.) was used. The mixing circuit was made
anaerobic, and solutions were loaded into the drive syringes as described
above for the stopped-flow experiments. Two 5 mL drive syringes were
used for 1:1 (v/v) rapid mixing, and a 5 mL/500 μL drive syringe
combination was used for 10:1 (v/v) mixing. FDPred solutions
were loaded into the 5 mL syringe for both mixing ratios. EPR samples
of Tm FDPred reactions with substoichiometric NO were prepared
by rapid mixing 10:1 (v/v) of an anaerobic 200–300 μM
solution of Tm FDPred with a 1.8 mM NO solution (prepared
at room temperature as described above). EPR samples of Tm FDPred reactions with excess NO were prepared similarly, except
mixing 1:1 (v/v) with ∼3 mM NO solution in buffer at 4 °C.
EPR samples of unreacted Tm FDPred were prepared analogously
to those for the NO reactions but substituting deoxygenated buffer
in place of the NO solutions. After the desired aging times, 350 μL
of the reaction mixture was sprayed into liquid isopentane at −150
to −160 °C. The resulting snow was collected in a glass
funnel immersed in the cold isopentane and packed into the bottom
of a 4 mm o.d. quartz EPR tube attached to the bottom of the funnel
with silicon tubing. The NO concentrations delivered to the protein
samples were quantified by rapid-mixing the same drive syringe-loaded
solution of NO with 1–5 mM FeIIEDTA in place of
the protein and collecting a 350 μL, 1 s sprayed and frozen
sample as described for the protein samples. The S = 3/2 EPR signal of the resulting FeEDTA–NO
was quantified by comparison to that of an FeEDTA–NO sample
prepared under 1 atm of NO and quantified as described above. The
packing factor was determined as the ratio of the peak-to-peak intensity
of the S = 5/2 EPR signal[38] of a separately sprayed and packed D. vulgarisferric Rd solution of known concentration
(determined using ε490nm = 8800 M–1 cm–1)[35] to that of
the signal from the same Rd sample in which the snow had been thawed
and refrozen in liquid N2. The packing factor was determined
to be 0.7, and the RFQ EPR spin concentration was corrected by this
packing factor.RFQ Mössbauer samples were prepared using
the drive-syringe loading and 1:1 (v/v) mixing conditions described
above except ∼1 mM Tm FDPred solutions at room temperature
were rapid-mixed with either ∼3 mM NO solutions in buffer at
4 °C or, for unreacted samples, deoxygenated buffer at 4 °C.
(The use of PROLI-NONOate to achieve higher NO concentrations proved
to be impractical for our RFQ apparatus.) Immediately before loading
the cold NO solution, its drive syringe and load line were cooled
by flushing three times with 4 °C deoxygenated buffer. After
the desired aging times, 350 μL of the reaction mixture was
sprayed into a 50 mL Falcon tube (Fisher Scientific) containing ∼40
mL of liquid ethane at −160 to −170 °C. Ethane
was removed from the frozen sample by decanting the liquid followed
by evacuation of the headspace with the tube immersed in a dry ice/methanol
bath.[39] NOTE: ethane is highly flammable.
Do not expose liquid ethane to an open flame and perform all manipulations
in a well-ventilated area. The resulting snow was transferred and
packed with a liquid-N2 cooled spatula to a liquid-N2 cooled RFQ Mössbauer cup. All of the reported quench
times are a sum of the aging time (minimum ∼5 ms) plus an estimated
15 ms freezing time.[40] All RFQ EPR and
Mössbauer samples were kept at liquid-N2 temperature
in a storage Dewar until spectral data collection.
EPR and Mössbauer
Spectroscopies
EPR spectra
were collected on a Bruker ESP 300E X-band spectrometer equipped with
a helium continuous flow cryostat model ESR 900 or 910 (Oxford Instruments,
Inc.). Standard parameters used for spectral collection were as follows:
modulation frequency, 100 kHz; modulation amplitude, 10.5 G; conversion
time, 81.9 ms; time constant, 5.1 ms. Microwave power and temperature
were adjusted to collect spectra at nonsaturating conditions. Values
for these latter parameters are listed in the figure captions. EPR
signals were quantified by relative to a 1 mM CuIIEDTA
standard in 10% glycerol. The CuII concentration was quantified
by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Species concentrations
were determined with the software SpinCount developed by M. P. Hendrich. 57Fe Mössbauer spectra were recorded with two spectrometers
using Janis Research dewars. Isomer shifts are reported relative to
Femetal at 298 K. The simulations of EPR and Mössbauer spectra
were calculated with least-squares fitting using the program SpinCount
and the standard spin Hamiltonian:For the simulations of two interacting
metal systems, the spin Hamiltonian is expanded to include terms for
each site, , , the exchange
interaction, , and the standard dipole–dipole
interaction.[41]
Results and Discussion
Throughout this narrative, unless otherwise noted, FDP refers specifically
to Tm FDP.
Reduction of FDPox
For reactions with NO,
FDPox (FMNox–FeIIIFeIII) was reduced anaerobically with a small molar excess of NADH and
catalytic concentrations of the native redox partner proteins, NROR
and Rd.[13,19] Complete reduction under these (anaerobic)
conditions took several hours. FMNox, the anionic FMN semiquinone
(FMNsq), and the fully reduced FMN (FMNH2) are
all redox accessible in FDPs.[15,33,42] These three FMN species dominate the UV–vis absorption spectra,
as shown in Figure 1A. The FeIIIFeIII/FeIIFeIII and FeIIFeIII/FeIIFeII couples in FDPs have
higher reduction potentials than those of both the FMNox/FMNsq and FMNsq/FMNH2 redox couples.[33] Thus, anaerobic reduction of FDPox with 2.2 mol equiv of NADH per diiron site in the presence of catalytic
NROR/Rd resulted in formation of the FDPsq (FMNsq–FeIIFeII) within the time of manual
mixing followed by a slower reduction to FDPred (FMNred–FeIIFeII). However, as shown
in Figure 1B, when Rd is equimolar with FDP,
rather than a catalytic concentration, reduction of FDPox to FDPred occurred within the time of manual mixing with
no detectable accumulation of FDPsq. This latter behavior
verifies the catalytic competence of the redox pathway.[13] This differing reducing behavior of catalytic
versus stoichiometric Rd is analogous to that observed for M. thermoacetica FDP and its physiological redox
partner protein.[43] The catalytic concentrations
used here avoided spectroscopic interference by the redox partner
proteins.
Figure 1
UV–vis absorption spectra of (A) before (FDPox), <1 min after (FDPsq), and several hours after (FDPred) addition of 140 μM NADH to a solution containing
5 μM Rd, 500 nM NROR, and 60 μM FDPox and (B)
before (FDPox) and immediately after (FDPred) addition of 140 μM NADH to a solution of 50 μM Rd,
500 nM NROR, and 50 μM FDPox. The listed concentrations
are those of the complete reaction mixtures in anaerobic buffer.
UV–vis absorption spectra of (A) before (FDPox), <1 min after (FDPsq), and several hours after (FDPred) addition of 140 μM NADH to a solution containing
5 μM Rd, 500 nM NROR, and 60 μM FDPox and (B)
before (FDPox) and immediately after (FDPred) addition of 140 μM NADH to a solution of 50 μM Rd,
500 nM NROR, and 50 μM FDPox. The listed concentrations
are those of the complete reaction mixtures in anaerobic buffer.The Mössbauer spectra in
Figure 2 confirm the diiron redox states in
FDPox and FDPred. The 4.2 K spectrum of FDPox (Figure 2B) showed a single sharp
quadrupole doublet with
parameters listed in Table 1. The parameters
are indicative of high-spin ferric iron. The sharp doublet, as opposed
to a broad paramagnetic spectrum, is attributed to antiferromagnetic
exchange coupling of the two S = 5/2 FeIII ions at the active site to give a S = 0 state lowest in energy. Figure 2A shows the Mössbauer spectrum of FDPred. All of
the iron in the FDPox converted into a single new quadrupole
doublet with parameters given in Table 1. The
parameters of the doublet are indicative of high-spin ferrous iron.
The Mössbauer parameters of both FDPox and FDPred are similar to those of the diiron sites of hemerythrin
and ribonucleotide reductase for the corresponding oxidation states.[44,45] The FDPox Mössbauer spectrum is similar to that
previously reported for the as-isolated FDP from M.
thermoacetica.[43] The single
sharp doublets in the spectra of both FDPox and FDPred (Γ =
0.31 mm/s) are indicative of equivalent electronic environments for
the individual iron centers in the diiron site, which is consistent
with the structure showing that each iron has the same type and number
of N- and O-donor ligands (Scheme 1).
Figure 2
Mössbauer
spectra (black bars) of (A) FDPred and
(B) FDPox recorded at 4.2 K in a magnetic field of 45 mT
applied parallel to the γ-ray direction. The blue lines are
Lorentzian fits with parameters listed in Table 1. The samples were prepared as described in Experimental
Procedures.
Table 1
Mössbauer
Parameters of FDP
Iron Species Observed in This Work
species
δ (mm/s)
ΔEq (mm/s)
FDPox (FeIIIFeIII)
0.47
0.99
FDPred (FeIIFeII)
1.15
2.39
FeII{FeNO}7
1.12, 0.67
1.98,
1.53
H, [{FeNO}7]2
0.71
1.85
L, [{FeNO}7]2
0.70
1.55
isolated {FeNO}7
∼0.65
∼-1.9
Mössbauer
spectra (black bars) of (A) FDPred and
(B) FDPox recorded at 4.2 K in a magnetic field of 45 mT
applied parallel to the γ-ray direction. The blue lines are
Lorentzian fits with parameters listed in Table 1. The samples were prepared as described in Experimental
Procedures.
Rapid Kinetics of FDPred Reaction with Substoichiometric
NO
The stopped-flow UV–vis absorption spectral time
course for the reaction of FDPred with substoichiometric
NO is shown in Figure 3. The spectral absorption
changes are essentially complete within ∼100 ms after mixing
(Figure 3A). UV–vis absorption difference
spectra were obtained by subtracting the FDPred spectrum
from the spectra following mixing with NO. The 100 ms difference spectrum
(Figure 3A, inset) has absorption features
at 418 (ε418nm = 1500 M–1 cm–1 per NO), 456 (ε456nm = 1450 M–1 cm–1) and 633 nm (ε633nm = 400 M–1 cm–1). The extinction
coefficients on the basis of the substoichiometric NO concentration
are consistent with complete formation of one {FeNO}7 per
diiron site within the mixing dead time. This absorption difference
spectrum is very similar to the absolute spectrum obtained when less
than or equal to 1 equiv of NO was manually mixed with the deflavinated
diferrous FDP.[16] Only very minor absorption
increases centered at ∼390 and 500 nm occurred between 47 ms
and 100 s (Figure 3B). Difference spectra (Figure
S1, Supporting Information) indicate that
these slower absorption increases are due to accumulation of a very
minor amount of anionic FMNsq. No spectral features of
FMNox developed on the 100 s time scale with substoichiometric
NO.
Figure 3
(A) 100 ms and (B) 100 s stopped-flow UV–vis absorption
spectral time courses for reactions of FDPred with ∼0.8
equiv of NO per diiron site at 3 °C. The spectra indicated as
FDPred were obtained upon stopped-flow mixing FDPred solution with deoxygenated buffer in place of the NO solution. Inset
in panel A shows the difference absorption spectrum obtained by subtracting
the FDPred spectrum from the 100 ms spectrum. Concentrations
after mixing: 880 μM FDPred and 680 μM NO.
The difference extinction axis in the inset is per molar of added
NO.
(A) 100 ms and (B) 100 s stopped-flow UV–vis absorption
spectral time courses for reactions of FDPred with ∼0.8
equiv of NO per diiron site at 3 °C. The spectra indicated as
FDPred were obtained upon stopped-flow mixing FDPred solution with deoxygenated buffer in place of the NO solution. Inset
in panel A shows the difference absorption spectrum obtained by subtracting
the FDPred spectrum from the 100 ms spectrum. Concentrations
after mixing: 880 μM FDPred and 680 μM NO.
The difference extinction axis in the inset is per molar of added
NO.An RFQ EPR sample of FDPred obtained 200 ms after mixing
with substoichiometric NO is shown in Figure 4. A minor S = 3/2 signal (not
shown) accounted for less than 2% of the diiron sites. The EPR spectrum
was dominated by an S = 1/2 signal (g = 2.39, 1.97, 1.70) that was essentially
identical to that previously assigned to FeII{FeNO}7 resulting from manual mixing of FDPred with less
than or equal to 1 equiv of NO.[19] The sharp
signal at g = 2 was attributed to a small amount
of FMNsq, and the signal at g = 1.97 was
attributed to a small amount of free NO. The g =
2.10 signal showed variable intensities relative to the FeII{FeNO}7 signal among several samples and has also been
reported previously in manually mixed samples of the same reaction.[19] This signal was attributed to a magnetic dipolar
interaction between a small portion of S = 1/2 FeII{FeNO}7 (using the g values listed above) and S = 1/2 FMNsq (g = 2.0) at a distance
of 4.5 Å (a dipolar term was added to the standard spin Hamiltonian[41]). The simulated concentration of this interacting
system was never more than 10% of that of the noninteracting FeII{FeNO}7 component. The S = 1/2 concentration in the RFQ sample of Figure 4 is in reasonable agreement with the added NO concentration
(110 μM S = 1/2 vs 130
μM added NO). The combination of the stopped-flow UV–vis
absorption spectral time course in Figure 3 and the RFQ EPR spectrum in Figure 4 shows
that reaction of FDPred with substoichiometric NO results
in rapid and nearly quantitative formation of FeII{FeNO}7, which is stable for at least several minutes. Since stopped-flow
time courses with substoichiometric NO showed no significant FMNH2 oxidation, the substoichiometric NO-reacted FDP species can
be confidently formulated as FMNH2–FeII{FeNO}7.
Figure 4
RFQ EPR spectra of FDPred (blue spectrum) and
200 ms
after mixing FDPred with ∼0.5 equiv of NO at 4 °C
(green spectrum). Simulated spectra are shown as black traces. The
black trace overlaying the green spectrum is the sum of “simulated
FeII{FeNO}7” and “simulated dipole-coupled”
between a minor portion (<3%) of FeII{FeNO}7 and FMNsq at a distance of 4.5 Å. The g = 1.92 indicates a small amount of free NO. A radical species (<1%)
at g = 2.0 attributed to FMNsq has been
clipped in both experimental spectra. Conditions immediately after
mixing: 250 μM FDPred and 130 μM NO in 50 mM
MOPS, pH 7.3. Instrumental parameters: microwaves, 9.645 GHz, 0.26
mW; temperature, 4 K.
RFQ EPR spectra of FDPred (blue spectrum) and
200 ms
after mixing FDPred with ∼0.5 equiv of NO at 4 °C
(green spectrum). Simulated spectra are shown as black traces. The
black trace overlaying the green spectrum is the sum of “simulated
FeII{FeNO}7” and “simulated dipole-coupled”
between a minor portion (<3%) of FeII{FeNO}7 and FMNsq at a distance of 4.5 Å. The g = 1.92 indicates a small amount of free NO. A radical species (<1%)
at g = 2.0 attributed to FMNsq has been
clipped in both experimental spectra. Conditions immediately after
mixing: 250 μM FDPred and 130 μM NO in 50 mM
MOPS, pH 7.3. Instrumental parameters: microwaves, 9.645 GHz, 0.26
mW; temperature, 4 K.
Mössbauer Spectra of FDPred Titrated with
NO
Mössbauer spectra were obtained for FDPred manually titrated with NONOate stock solutions. To ensure complete
reaction, the NONOate-titrated samples were incubated anaerobically
for ∼5 min at room temperature before freezing. The Mössbauer
spectra for these samples were recorded at temperatures of 80 K (Figure 5A, no magnetic field) and 4 K (Figure 5B, magnetic field of 45 mT). Table 1 lists the parameters for each species, and Table 2 lists the corresponding percent compositions of iron species.
Prior to addition of NO, the spectra at both temperatures showed a
single doublet from the diferrous state of FDPred. At 80
K, titration with NO up to 1.5 equiv showed that the area of the doublet
from FDPred diminished concomitant with the development
of two new doublets with equal areas (δ = 1.12 mm/s, ΔEQ = 1.98 mm/s; δ = 0.67 mm/s, ΔEQ = 1.53 mm/s). The new doublets are assigned
to the FeII and {FeNO}7 centers, respectively,
of the FeII{FeNO}7 complex. The values of δ
= 0.67 mm/s and ΔEQ = 1.53 mm/s
unambiguously identify an [FeNO]7 complex.[26−29] The relative contributions of each doublet are shown in Figure S2
(Supporting Information) for a selection
of three spectra from Figure 5A. The sums of
all spectral species at the amounts listed in Table 2 are the theoretical lines overlaid on the spectra. At 4.2
K (Figure 5B), the FeII{FeNO}7 complex appeared as a broad paramagnetic pattern as expected
for a S = 1/2 species. This
broad spectrum is dependent on the magnetic properties of both iron
ions and is not straightforward to simulate.[31] On the basis of the high-temperature spectra, this complex was 90%
of the iron in the 1.5 equiv sample. A minor amount (5%) of the FDPred doublet was subtracted from the 1.5 equiv spectrum to obtain
a “clean” spectrum of the FeII{FeNO}7 complex at low temperature. The sum of this “clean”
spectrum and the doublets of the other species at the same percentages
as that of the high-temperature data produced the fits shown in Figure 5B. The isomer shifts, quadrupole splittings, and
paramagnetic broadening of the S = 1/2 species are reminiscent of that for the S = 1/2 FeII{FeNO}7 complex
of hemerythrin.[27,31] From 1.5 to 2.5 equiv of NO,
the proportions of diferrous (∼8%) and FeII{FeNO}7 (∼87%) remained relatively stable. The addition of
5 equiv of NO resulted in complete conversion to an antiferromagnetically
coupled diferric spectrum that is indistinguishable from that of FDPox.
Figure 5
57Fe Mössbauer spectra (vertical bars) of 500
μM FDPred titrated with NO. Spectra were recorded
at (A) 80 K in zero field or (B) 4 K in a magnetic field of 45 mT
applied parallel to the γ-ray direction. The NO molar equivalents
added per FDP active site are as listed. The blue traces overlaying
the experimental spectra are the resultant simulation sums of the
components using the species of Table 1 in
the amounts of Table 2.
Table 2
Percent Composition of Iron Complexes
from NO Titration of FDPred
percent
composition
NO added
per active site
FeIIFeII
FeII{FeNO}7
FeIIIFeIII
L
0
100
0
0
0
0.3
73
27
0
0
0.6
51
49
0
0
0.9
22
74
0
4
1.5
5
90
0
5
2.0
10
85
0
5
2.5
7
87
0
6
5
0
0
100
0
57Fe Mössbauer spectra (vertical bars) of 500
μM FDPred titrated with NO. Spectra were recorded
at (A) 80 K in zero field or (B) 4 K in a magnetic field of 45 mT
applied parallel to the γ-ray direction. The NO molar equivalents
added per FDP active site are as listed. The blue traces overlaying
the experimental spectra are the resultant simulation sums of the
components using the species of Table 1 in
the amounts of Table 2.EPR samples of FDPred plus 0.3, 0.6, and 0.9 equiv of
NO were prepared at the same time and from the same protein material
as the Mössbauer samples of Figure 5. The EPR spectra of these three samples (Figure S3, Supporting Information) showed that the amount
of the S = 1/2 FeII{FeNO}7 complex quantitatively agreed with the proportion
of the paramagnetically broadened component in the Mössbauer
spectra of Figure 5, indicating that this broadened
feature in the Mössbauer spectra originated from the S = 1/2 FeII{FeNO}7 complex. These spectral titrations confirm that the FeIIFeII site in FDPred reacts with substoichiometric
NO to form FeII{FeNO}7. The Mössbauer
data also show that the FeIIFeII site can be
oxidized quantitatively to the diferric (FeIIIFeIII) state by NO only slightly in excess (5 equiv) of the hypothetical
minimum needed to remove four electrons from the FDPred active site. This end product has identical isomer shift and quadrupole
splitting parameters as FDPox. Iron species other than
those listed in Table 2 were not detected in
significant amounts during this titration. The minor species L, listed in Table 2, is discussed
below in the context of the RFQ experiments. These RFQ results also
show that, with ∼3 equiv of NO per diferrous site (i.e., between
the 2.5 and 5 equiv listed in Table 2), at
2 min reaction time, a minor portion of the diferric species characteristic
of FDPox appears.
Presteady-State
Reactions of FDPred with Excess NO
Stopped-flow
mixing of FDPred with excess NO resulted
in the UV–vis absorption spectral time courses shown in Figure 6. A rapid phase that was complete within 130 ms
(Figure 6A) preceded a much slower phase that
occurred over the course of 120 s (panel B). The inset to Figure 6A shows the difference spectra obtained by subtracting
the FDPred absorption spectrum from the 130 ms time course
spectra. These difference spectra clearly show the development of
the {FeNO}7 species. On the basis of comparison with the
substoichiometric NO difference spectrum in Figure 3A, the shoulder at ∼418 nm in the 1.3 ms difference
spectrum in Figure 6A indicates formation of
FeII{FeNO}7 within the mixing dead time. Over
the course of 130 ms, the 418 nm shoulder became less prominent, and
a spectrum with absorptions centered at 340, 453, and 630 nm developed.
The absorption features and extinction coefficient of the 130 ms difference
spectrum in Figure 6A (ε453nm/2Fe ∼ 2000 M–1 cm–1)
indicates substantial formation of additional {FeNO}7 beyond
FeII{FeNO}7 and as will become clear from the
Mössbauer results described below can be assigned to formation
of a diferrous-dinitrosyl ([{FeNO}7]2) complex.
The 130 ms time course with excess NO can thus be confidently ascribed
to successive formation of FeII{FeNO}7 and [{FeNO}7]2 from the FeIIFeII site
in FDPred. Single value decomposition and global analysis
of the 130 ms spectral time course (Supporting
Information, Figure S4) reinforce this interpretation.
Figure 6
(A) 130 ms
and (B) 130 s stopped-flow UV–vis absorption
spectral time courses for reactions of FDPred (70 μM)
with excess NO (900 μM) at 3 °C. The spectrum indicated
as FDPred was obtained upon stopped-flow mixing the FDPred solution with deoxygenated buffer in place of the NO solution.
Panel A spectra were collected in 13 ms intervals after the 1.3 ms
spectrum. Inset of panel A shows difference absorption spectra obtained
by subtracting the FDPred spectrum from the time course
spectra (color-coded as in the main panel). Panel B spectra after
mixing with NO were collected in log scale intervals.
(A) 130 ms
and (B) 130 s stopped-flow UV–vis absorption
spectral time courses for reactions of FDPred (70 μM)
with excess NO (900 μM) at 3 °C. The spectrum indicated
as FDPred was obtained upon stopped-flow mixing the FDPred solution with deoxygenated buffer in place of the NO solution.
Panel A spectra were collected in 13 ms intervals after the 1.3 ms
spectrum. Inset of panel A shows difference absorption spectra obtained
by subtracting the FDPred spectrum from the time course
spectra (color-coded as in the main panel). Panel B spectra after
mixing with NO were collected in log scale intervals.The slower portion of the stopped-flow spectral
time course shown
in Figure 6B was dominated by the intense absorption
features of FMNox, which accumulated quantitatively over
∼120 s. Spectral features attributable to FMNsq were
not apparent. Comparison of the time course in Figure 6A with that in Figure 6B shows that
the majority of the diiron sites formed [{FeNO}7]2 prior to any significant oxidation of FMNH2. The quantitative
oxidation of FMNH2 to FMNox in the presence
of excess NO is in stark contrast to the lack of any detectable FMNox formation in the stopped-flow spectral time course with
substoichiometric NO (Figure 3). The stopped-flow
spectral time courses in Figures 3 and 6 thus indicate that the successive formation of
FeII{FeNO}7 and [{FeNO}7]2 precedes FMNH2 oxidation.An RFQ EPR time course
for FDPred reacted with a similarly
large excess of NO as for the stopped-flow experiments (Figure S5, Supporting Information) showed a low intensity S = 1/2 FeII{FeNO}7 signal at 130 ms (∼0.2 spins/2Fe), which decreased
at longer quench times. A signal near g ∼ 4 assigned to S = 3/2 {FeNO}7 and accounting
for ∼10% of the total iron did not appreciably vary with quench
time and is attributed to a small portion of mononuclear iron sites.
The majority of the diiron sites were thus EPR silent under RFQ conditions
analogous to those used for the stopped-flow spectra in Figure 6.Figure S6 (Supporting
Information) shows
an analogous stopped-flow absorption spectral time course for the
Tm diferrous deflavo-FDP reaction with excess NO. The time scales
and spectral features of diferrous dinitrosyl formation and decay
in Figure S6 (Supporting Information) are
very similar to those of the formation of diferrous dinitrosyl and
FMNH2 oxidation, respectively, in the FDPred shown in Figure 6. Notably the deflavo-FDP
spectral time courses did not require subtraction of any FMN spectral
changes. As note previously,[16] only a portion
of the diferrous sites turn over in the deflavo-FDP, which is why
the diferrous dinitrosyl absorption features in Figure S6 (Supporting Information) do not decay completely.
However, as noted previously, the portion of the diferrous deflavo-FDP
sites that did turn over generated N2O.[16]The RFQ57Fe Mössbauer spectral
time course for
reaction of FDPred with a ∼3 equiv of NO per diiron
site is shown in Figure 7, for spectra recorded
at 80 K (A) and 4 K (B). These spectra provided definitive evidence
for the formation of a transient S = 0 [{FeNO}7]2 complex. The spectra labeled FDPred in Figure 7 were obtained from a sample prepared
by RFQ mixing FDPred with NO-free buffer. These spectra
showed that 20% of the diiron sites were in the diferric state (FDPox) with the remainder present as FDPred. The diferric
species was not present in any of the subsequent samples mixed with
NO until the 120 s time point and does not appear in the FDPred spectrum of Figure 2. Therefore, the diferric
species in the FDPred spectrum of Figure 7 was presumed to arise from O2 contamination.
Figure 7
57Fe Mössbauer spectra (vertical bars) for RFQ
of FDPred mixed with ∼3 equiv of NO per active site
at ∼15 °C and quenched at the times listed near each spectrum.
The spectra were recorded at (A) 80 K in zero magnetic field or (B)
4 K in a magnetic field of 45 mT applied parallel to the γ-ray
direction. The colored traces are simulations of species assigned
to FeIIFeII (blue), FeII (green)
{FeNO}7 (red) of FeII{FeNO}7, L (light blue), H (pink), and diferric (purple),
respectively, using the parameters listed in Table 1 and percent compositions listed in Table 3; black traces are the sums of the simulated species spectra.
Concentrations immediately after mixing: 500 μM FDPred and 1500 μM NO.
57Fe Mössbauer spectra (vertical bars) for RFQ
of FDPred mixed with ∼3 equiv of NO per active site
at ∼15 °C and quenched at the times listed near each spectrum.
The spectra were recorded at (A) 80 K in zero magnetic field or (B)
4 K in a magnetic field of 45 mT applied parallel to the γ-ray
direction. The colored traces are simulations of species assigned
to FeIIFeII (blue), FeII (green)
{FeNO}7 (red) of FeII{FeNO}7, L (light blue), H (pink), and diferric (purple),
respectively, using the parameters listed in Table 1 and percent compositions listed in Table 3; black traces are the sums of the simulated species spectra.
Concentrations immediately after mixing: 500 μM FDPred and 1500 μM NO.
Table 3
RFQ of FDPred with ∼3
equiv NO per Diiron Site
composition
of iron speciesa (%)
quench time
(s)
FeIIFeII
FeII{FeNO}7
[{FeNO}7]2H
FeIIIFeIII
L or isolated {FeNO}7c
0b
80
0
0
20
0
0.02
16
76
0
0
8
0.2
0
54
41
0
5
2
0
69
28
0
3
20
0
90
0
0
10
120
0
80
0
13
7
From Mössbauer
spectra of
Figure 7.
FDPred with NO-free buffer.
Sum of both species.
The quench times subsequent to mixing with NO are indicated
in
Figure 7. The spectra showed clear evidence
four distinct species from the enzymatic active site: FDPred, FDPox, S = 1/2 FeII{FeNO}7, and a transient species H. In addition, two minority species are present in variable
amount in the samples of the time course: isolated S = 3/2 {FeNO}7, and species L. The two minority species in total account for less than
10% of the iron in any of the time points. The parameters for each
complex are listed in Table 1, and their corresponding
percentages of the total iron at the various quench times are listed
in Table 3. All of the 80 K spectra showed
a species having two doublets of equal intensity (red and green Lorentzian
simulations of Figure 7A). These two doublets
have parameters identical to those assigned to the FeII{FeNO}7 complex obtained in the NO titration (Figure 4 and Table 1). Similarly,
all the 4 K spectra (Figure 7B) showed the
same broad paramagnetic pattern attributable to the S = 1/2 FeII{FeNO}7 complex,
at an area equal to that of the corresponding red and green simulated
doublets in the 80 K spectra. The FeII{FeNO}7 complex was present at the earliest time point (20 ms) and constituted
the majority of the iron throughout the time course. The fits (black
lines) in Figure 7B are the sum of the FeII{FeNO}7 spectrum and the other doublets discussed
below. The spectral area of each species comprising the summation
in each of the 4.2 K spectra were constrained to be equal to the areas
of the corresponding species of the 80 K spectra.From Mössbauer
spectra of
Figure 7.FDPred with NO-free buffer.Sum of both species.The parameters for two other doublets, labeled H (for
high reactivity) and L (for low reactivity), are listed
in Table 1. Species H was observed
only for reaction times ranging from 0.2 to 2 s, whereas L was observed as a minority species (∼5% of total iron) over
the entire time course. By 200 ms, no diferrous remained, and H was present at 41% of the total iron. By 2 s, H had decreased to 28% total iron and was accompanied by a proportional
increase in FeII{FeNO}7. At and after 20 s,
the majority of the iron was FeII{FeNO}7. At
2 min, the amount of FeII{FeNO}7 decreased slightly,
owing to the oxidation of iron, as demonstrated by the presence of
a diferric species attributable to FDPox. The presence
of a relatively small proportion of FDPox compared to that
of the NO titration (Figure 4) can be attributed
to the modest excess of NO in these RFQ samples.As indicated
by the simulations of Figure 7, species H showed a single quadrupole doublet. The
isomer shift and quadrupole splitting of species H (Table 1) clearly identify all the iron of this species
as high-spin S = 3/2 {FeNO}7. The absence of a paramagnetic pattern could be attributed
to either an exchange interaction between the iron ions or fast electronic
relaxation. Mössbauer spectra were recorded in high magnetic
field (7.5 T) to resolve this ambiguity and further characterize the
molecular species. The red-colored spectrum in Figure 8 is of the same 200 ms sample used to obtain the low-field
spectrum in Figure 7. The blue-colored spectrum
in Figure 8 is of the FDPred and
2 equiv of NO sample from the titration series of Figure 5 and is displayed at 55% of the area of the 200
ms spectrum. The 2 equiv of NO titration sample was chosen for its
relatively high proportion of the FeII{FeNO}7 species. The other species identified by simulation in Figure 8A (black line) is from an isolated S = 3/2 {FeNO}7 species, which accounts
for 6% of the total iron in the sample. The parameters (see figure
caption) for this minority species are typical of a mononuclear S = 3/2 {FeNO}7 center[26] but cannot be accurately determined due to the
low amount and is virtually imperceptible in the low-field spectra.
This minor mononuclear species could be due to NO reactions with either
iron-deficient active sites or adventitious iron. The green-colored
spectrum of Figure 8B is the difference of
the three spectra of Figure 8A (red minus blue
minus black). The simulation on the difference spectrum in Figure 8B (black line) is for a diamagnetic species (S = 0) using the low-field parameters of H,
which accounted for 39% of the total iron in the sample, and in agreement
with the amount of species H determined at low field.
The Mössbauer parameters and magnetic behavior unambiguously
identify species H as an antiferromagnetic exchange-coupled
pair of equivalent S = 3/2 {FeNO}7 units, [{FeNO}7]2.[28,32] The variation of the exchange interaction energy, J, in simulations of two identical exchange-coupled S = 3/2 {FeNO}7 centers (assuming D = 14 cm–1[26,28,31] indicated J ≥ 40 cm–1 (). Simulations using values of J less than 40 cm–1 resulted in a shift
of the outer
lines perceptibly inward of the data. Species L was a
minor component in both the RFQ and titration samples and persisted
to significantly longer reaction times (∼30 min). The similarity
of the Mössbauer parameters of L and H suggests that L is also a S = 0 [{FeNO}7]2 species but with low or no corresponding catalytic
activity. As was the case for the FDPox and FDPred Mössbauer spectra, the sharp line width of species H (Γ = 0.30 mm/s) is consistent with the individual
{FeNO}7 centers having the same type and number of N- and
O-donor ligands, including a single NO.
Figure 8
(A) 57Fe Mössbauer
spectra (temperature, 4 K;
magnetic field, 7.5 T) of (red bars) of RFQ mixed FDPred with ∼3 equiv of NO per active site at ∼15 °C
and quenched at 200 ms (the same 200 ms sample used for Figure 7), and (blue bars) FDPred + 2 equiv of
NO from the titration series of Figure 5, displayed
at 59% of the area of the red spectrum. The black line in (A) is a
simulation for S = 3/2, D = 15 cm–1, E/D = 0.02, Aiso = −25
T, δ = 0.65 mm/s, ΔEq = −1.9
mm/s, η = 0.4, 6% of area of red spectrum. (B) The green line
is the difference of the three spectra in A (red minus blue minus
black). The black line is a simulation for S = 0,
δ = 0.77 mm/s, ΔEq = 1.85
mm/s, η = 1, 37% of area of red spectrum.
(A) 57Fe Mössbauer
spectra (temperature, 4 K;
magnetic field, 7.5 T) of (red bars) of RFQ mixed FDPred with ∼3 equiv of NO per active site at ∼15 °C
and quenched at 200 ms (the same 200 ms sample used for Figure 7), and (blue bars) FDPred + 2 equiv of
NO from the titration series of Figure 5, displayed
at 59% of the area of the red spectrum. The black line in (A) is a
simulation for S = 3/2, D = 15 cm–1, E/D = 0.02, Aiso = −25
T, δ = 0.65 mm/s, ΔEq = −1.9
mm/s, η = 0.4, 6% of area of red spectrum. (B) The green line
is the difference of the three spectra in A (red minus blue minus
black). The black line is a simulation for S = 0,
δ = 0.77 mm/s, ΔEq = 1.85
mm/s, η = 1, 37% of area of red spectrum.
Comparison with Steady-State Parameters
Previous attempts
to obtain Michaelis–Menten parameters for the Tm FDP NOR activity[16] were hampered by its unusually high Km and the difficulty of achieving milllimolar
NO concentrations in the assay solutions. This barrier was overcome
by using PROLI-NONOate stock solutions for NO delivery and the activity
assay conditions described in the Supporting Information. The Michaelis–Menten fit to the steady-state activity data
(Figure S7, Supporting Information) gave Km = 1000 μM and kcat = 0.6 s–1. The Mössbauer titration
data in Table 2, the RFQ EPR spin quantification
from Figure 4, and previously reported EPR
spin quantifications[19] all showed nearly
quantitative FeII{FeNO}7 formation upon reaction
of FDPred with less than or equal to 1 equiv of NO per
diiron site. As described above, an RFQ EPR time course (Figure S5, Supporting Information) showed transient minor
amounts of FeII{FeNO}7 even at 1500 μM
NO (>10 equiv per diiron site). These quantifications indicate
that
the first NO binds to the diiron site with much higher affinity than
does the second. The stopped-flow time courses with 0.8 equiv of NO
per diiron site in Figure 3 show formation
of a stable FeII{FeNO}7 without significant
FMNH2 oxidation, the latter of which occurred only with
excess NO (Figure 6). Therefore, the steady-state Km likely reflects the much lower affinity for
the second NO.
Kinetics and Mechanism of the FDP NOR Reaction
The
results described here together with those from previously reported
studies[16,19] lead us to the mechanistic conclusions summarized
in Scheme 3. Starting from FDPred (FMNH2–FeIIFeII), the first
NO reacts relatively rapidly (submillisecond) and with high affinity,
resulting in FMNH2–FeII{FeNO}7 (S = 1/2 diiron site). This
form is stable at less than or equal to 1 equiv of NO. With excess
NO, the FMNH2–FeII{FeNO}7 reacts
with a second NO over the course of 100 ms to form an FMNH2–[{FeNO}7]2 intermediate (S = 0, diiron site, Mössbauer species H). In the
rate-limiting step for the first turnover, the [{FeNO}7]2 converts to diferric over the course of ∼2 min,
leading to a species we formulate as FMNH2–FeIIIFeIII. This species does not accumulate due to
rapid internal electron transfer, leading to FMNox–FeIIFeII, as manifested by FMNH2 oxidation
in the UV–vis absorption spectral time course with excess NO.
This reaction sequence completes the first turnover of 2 NO →
N2O. Depending on the level of excess NO, the diferrous
site in FMNox–FeIIFeII then
reacts with either one or two more NO analogously to that for the
first turnover, ultimately leading to FDPox at a sufficiently
large excess (>4 equiv) of NO. The reaccumulation of FeII{FeNO}7 in the RFQ Mössbauer spectral time course
(Table 3) with ∼3 equiv of NO and its
accumulation in the manual NO titration with less than 4 eq NO (Table 2) are consistent with this scenario. Scheme 3 together with the high Km for binding the second NO explains the less than quantitative accumulation
of the [{FeNO}7]2 species H and
diferric in the Mössbauer RFQ time course with 3 equiv of NO
(Table 3).
Scheme 3
The results reflected in Scheme 3 can be
used to distinguish among the proposed mechanisms in Scheme 2. The sr mechanism requires a proximal FMNH2 in order to produce N2O. This requirement for
proximal FMNH2 implies that the FMNox–FeIIFeII formed resulting from the first turnover
could not proceed beyond either FMNox–FeII{FeNO}7 or, at sufficiently large excesses of NO, FMNox–[{FeNO}7]2. Therefore, in the
absence of exogenous reducing equivalents, the sr mechanism would
result in formation of a maximum of one N2O per four-electron
reduced active site and could not attain the four-electron oxidized
state, FDPox, even with excess NO. However, our results
show that, at 5 equiv of NO, the active site of FDPred undergoes
quantitative four-electron oxidation to FMNox–FeIIIFeIII (FDPox). Production of two N2O per FDPred active site from this reaction is
also supported by previous Fourier transform IR data.[16] The “inherent” ability of the [{FeNO}7]2 (S = 0) site to turn over 2NO
→ N2O in FDP is also supported by previously reported[16] results on a deflavo-FDP. A comparison of the
stopped-flow UV–vis absorption spectral time courses in Figure 6 and Figure S6 (Supporting Information) show that the first turnover of the diferrous-dinitrosyl in FDP
occurs on the same time scale as that in the deflavo-FDP. Thus, these
cumulative results do not support the sr mechanism. The hyp mechanism
in Scheme 2 does not include [{FeNO}7]2 and is therefore also inconsistent with our results.
However, the cumulative results are fully consistent with the diFeNO
mechanism, in which [{FeNO}7]2 converts “spontaneously”
to FeIIIFeIII and N2O in the rate-limiting
step for both turnovers (r.d.s. in Scheme 3).
N–N Bond Formation and N–O Bond Cleavage
N2O formation from two NO requires N–N bond formation
and an N–O bond cleavage. While the timing and sequence of
these bond formation and cleavage events in FDP remain mysterious,
our results suggest some restrictions on these processes in FDP. First
and foremost is the apparent requirement for an antiferromagnetically
coupled [{FeNO}7]2 species. The lower limit
determined for the antiferromagnetic coupling in this[{FeNO}7]2 species, J ≥ 40 cm–1, is consistent with retention of the 1,3-bridging
carboxylate together with either a hydroxo or oxo bridge, as shown
in Scheme 1.[46] This
bridging motif would place the two {FeNO}7 centers in close
proximity, thereby facilitating N–N bond formation. Our results
do not rule out the possibility that N–N bond formation from
[{FeNO}7]2 involves a diferric-hyponitrite intermediate.
However, at least under our conditions, such a species would have
to be a nonaccumulating transient species between [{FeNO}7]2 and FeIIIFeIII and N2O. Formation of N2O from [{FeNO}7]2 presumably requires cleavage of only one of the two substrate N–O
bonds. Therefore, it might seem that some asymmetry must arise in
the two {FeNO}7 centers despite the very similar coordination
spheres around Fe1 and Fe2 (Scheme 1) and the
indistinguishable Mossbauer parameters of the two {FeNO}7 centers. On the other hand, reduction of a symmetrical dirutheniumdinitrosyl complex has been reported to form a diruthenium complex
with a symmetrically N–N-bridging formally hyponitrito ligand,
which upon addition of a proton source, yielded N2O.[47] We are unaware of any verified synthetic nonheme
iron hyponitrito complexes.While the diferrous mononitrosyl
(FeII{FeNO}7) must be inherently asymmetrical,
it is currently unclear whether the NO selectively binds to the iron
proximal or distal to the FMN.[13] The N–O
stretching frequency is abnormally low in the diferrous mononitrosyl
complex of this FDP, implying a potentially “activated”
FeIII–NO– character, which was
attributed to a semibridging interaction with the other iron, as depicted
in Scheme 3.[19] The
N–O stretching frequencies are not yet known for the magnetically
coupled diferrous dinitrosyl (species H) identified in
the present study.Protonation of a substrate oxygen by either
a proximal amino acid
side chain or solvent (possibly the bridging solvent ligand) is presumably
an additional requirement for N–O bond cleavage leading to
N2O formation. However, we have recently determined by
stopped-flow spectroscopy that the rates of neither formation of the
diferrous dinitrosyl nor FMNH2 oxidation with excess NO
show an isotope effect after equilibration of the FDPred in D2O (Frederick, R. E.; Kurtz, D. M., Jr., unpublished).
This negative result indicates that any proton transfer must occur
after the rate-limiting step leading to N2O formation.
Therefore, it is tempting to speculate that the rate-limiting process
involves N–N bond formation followed by rapid protonation of
a transient hyponitrito ligand. In any case, our results indicate
that N–N bond formation and N–O bond cleavage originate
from what appears to be a structurally and electronically symmetrical
antiferromagnetically coupled [{FeNO}7]2 site
in FDP. Our preliminary results on FDPs with significantly higher
NOR activities and higher second NO binding affinities support this
conclusion.
Authors: J M Nocek; D M Kurtz; J T Sage; Y M Xia; P Debrunner; A K Shiemke; J Sanders-Loehr; T M Loehr Journal: Biochemistry Date: 1988-02-09 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Sheng Zheng; Timothy C Berto; Eric W Dahl; Melissa B Hoffman; Amy L Speelman; Nicolai Lehnert Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2013-03-19 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Vera L Gonçalves; João B Vicente; Liliana Pinto; Célia V Romão; Carlos Frazão; Paolo Sarti; Alessandro Giuffrè; Miguel Teixeira Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2014-08-23 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Rosanne E Frederick; Jonathan D Caranto; Cesar A Masitas; Linda L Gebhardt; Charles E MacGowan; Ronald J Limberger; Donald M Kurtz Journal: J Biol Inorg Chem Date: 2015-02-21 Impact factor: 3.358
Authors: Andrew C Weitz; Nitai Giri; Jonathan D Caranto; Donald M Kurtz; Emile L Bominaar; Michael P Hendrich Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2017-08-16 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Aniruddha Dey; Jesse B Gordon; Therese Albert; Sinan Sabuncu; Maxime A Siegler; Samantha N MacMillan; Kyle M Lancaster; Pierre Moënne-Loccoz; David P Goldberg Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2021-08-20 Impact factor: 16.823
Authors: Célia V Romão; João B Vicente; Patrícia T Borges; Carlos Frazão; Miguel Teixeira Journal: J Biol Inorg Chem Date: 2016-01-14 Impact factor: 3.358
Authors: Yunbo Jiang; Takahiro Hayashi; Hirotoshi Matsumura; Loi H Do; Amit Majumdar; Stephen J Lippard; Pierre Moënne-Loccoz Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2014-08-27 Impact factor: 15.419