Literature DB >> 32994555

Circumcision in childhood and male sexual function: a blessing or a curse?

Beatriz Bañuelos Marco1, Jessica Leigh García Heil2,3.   

Abstract

Male circumcision (MC) is the first planned surgical procedure ever performed. Nowadays many of these procedures are not necessarily carried out in a medical environment, therefore the real number remains unknown but it is estimated that one third of the men are circumcised. Some authors argue the negative impact of MC on men psychology and sexual life, but objective data are lacking. The purpose of this review is to summarize in the best possible way the literature to clarify this matter. A non-systematic narrative review was performed including articles between 1986 and 2019. The search for literature was carried out between July 2019 to October 2019 and any updates as of March 30, 2020. Although many authors support the hypothesis that circumcision status has an impact on sexual functioning, a negative outcome has not yet been entirely proven. Circumcision might affect how men perceive their body image, and consequently affect their sexual life. We should consider this when analysing the literature about MC and sexual dysfunction, as many of the results are based on specific populations with different attitudes towards this procedure. Sexual function consists of many elements that not only relate to measurable facts such as anatomy, somatosensory and histology. An objective evaluation of the impact of circumcision on sexuality is still challenging, as it affects a wide variety of people that confront sexuality differently due to their sociocultural and historical background. Therefore, individuals can either perceive their circumcision status as a blessing or a curse depending on the values and preferences of the different communities or social environments where they belong.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32994555      PMCID: PMC7985026          DOI: 10.1038/s41443-020-00354-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Impot Res        ISSN: 0955-9930            Impact factor:   2.896


  43 in total

1.  [Erectile function evaluation after adult circumcision].

Authors:  Zhoujun Shen; Shanwen Chen; Chunxia Zhu; Qun Wan; Zhaodian Chen
Journal:  Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue       Date:  2004-01

2.  The effect of male circumcision on sexuality.

Authors:  Robin Willcourt
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  The prepuce: specialized mucosa of the penis and its loss to circumcision.

Authors:  J R Taylor; A P Lockwood; A J Taylor
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1996-02

4.  Advantages and disadvantages of neonatal circumcision.

Authors:  R Goldman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-07-16       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Canadian Urological Association guideline on the care of the normal foreskin and neonatal circumcision in Canadian infants (abridged version).

Authors:  Sumit Dave; Kourosh Afshar; Luis H Braga; Peter Anderson
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Male circumcision for the prevention of HSV-2 and HPV infections and syphilis.

Authors:  Aaron A R Tobian; David Serwadda; Thomas C Quinn; Godfrey Kigozi; Patti E Gravitt; Oliver Laeyendecker; Blake Charvat; Victor Ssempijja; Melissa Riedesel; Amy E Oliver; Rebecca G Nowak; Lawrence H Moulton; Michael Z Chen; Steven J Reynolds; Maria J Wawer; Ronald H Gray
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  The effect of male circumcision on sexual satisfaction and function, results from a randomized trial of male circumcision for human immunodeficiency virus prevention, Rakai, Uganda.

Authors:  Godfrey Kigozi; Stephen Watya; Chelsea B Polis; Denis Buwembo; Valerian Kiggundu; Maria J Wawer; David Serwadda; Fred Nalugoda; Noah Kiwanuka; Melanie C Bacon; Victor Ssempijja; Frederick Makumbi; Ronald H Gray
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 8.  A 'snip' in time: what is the best age to circumcise?

Authors:  Brian J Morris; Jake H Waskett; Joya Banerjee; Richard G Wamai; Aaron A R Tobian; Ronald H Gray; Stefan A Bailis; Robert C Bailey; Jeffrey D Klausner; Robin J Willcourt; Daniel T Halperin; Thomas E Wiswell; Adrian Mindel
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 2.125

9.  Examining the association between male circumcision and sexual function: evidence from a British probability survey.

Authors:  Virginia Homfray; Clare Tanton; Kirstin R Mitchell; Robert F Miller; Nigel Field; Wendy Macdowall; Kaye Wellings; Pam Sonnenberg; Anne M Johnson; Catherine H Mercer
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 4.177

10.  Early infant male circumcision: Systematic review, risk-benefit analysis, and progress in policy.

Authors:  Brian J Morris; Sean E Kennedy; Alex D Wodak; Adrian Mindel; David Golovsky; Leslie Schrieber; Eugenie R Lumbers; David J Handelsman; John B Ziegler
Journal:  World J Clin Pediatr       Date:  2017-02-08
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Psychological, psychosocial, and psychosexual aspects of penile circumcision.

Authors:  Marcus C Tye; Lauren M Sardi
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 2.896

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.