Literature DB >> 33440128

Decline in Frequency of Newborn Male Circumcision After Change in Medicaid Coverage Status in Selected States in the United States.

Taron Torosian1, Joshua J Quint2, Jeffrey D Klausner2,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Male circumcision is linked to a reduction in the risk of HIV infection, sexually transmitted infections, penile inflammatory skin disorders, cancers, urinary tract infections, and other complications. We examined the extent to which the change in circumcision recommendation by the American Academy of Pediatrics in 1999 and Medicaid coverage status in states affected the total number of procedures performed.
METHODS: We used data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample for 1998-2011 collected annually by the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. We examined data on all male births in the United States with Medicaid and private health insurance. We then categorized births into 4 groups: (1) births with newborn male circumcision procedure, (2) births with Medicaid or private health insurance, (3) births that occurred in states where Medicaid coverage for newborn male circumcision was removed, and (4) births that occurred before or after the policy change. We used multivariable logistic regression to estimate the adjusted odds of newborn male circumcision.
RESULTS: In the 10 states where a change in Medicaid policy occurred, circumcision frequency had a mean percentage-point decrease of 21.4% among Medicaid beneficiaries and 3.2% among private health insurance beneficiaries from before to after the policy change. In states where coverage was maintained, the change in circumcision frequency was negligible for Medicaid and private health insurance beneficiaries. These changes resulted in an estimated 163 456 potential circumcisions not performed.
CONCLUSION: Decreases in newborn male circumcision frequency correlated with the Medicaid policy change for the procedure. Efforts should be made to reduce barriers for cost-effective preventive procedures that promote health, such as newborn male circumcision.

Entities:  

Keywords:  infectious diseases; newborn male circumcision; policy changes

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33440128      PMCID: PMC8580394          DOI: 10.1177/0033354920971719

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  18 in total

Review 1.  Why circumcision is a biomedical imperative for the 21(st) century.

Authors:  Brian J Morris
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.345

Review 2.  Dermatoses of the glans penis and prepuce.

Authors:  J C English; R A Laws; G C Keough; J L Wilde; J P Foley; D M Elston
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 11.527

3.  Risk factors for penile cancer: results of a population-based case-control study in Los Angeles County (United States).

Authors:  H F Tsen; H Morgenstern; T Mack; R K Peters
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  Male circumcision, penile human papillomavirus infection, and cervical cancer in female partners.

Authors:  Xavier Castellsagué; F Xavier Bosch; Nubia Muñoz; Chris J L M Meijer; Keerti V Shah; Silvia de Sanjose; José Eluf-Neto; Corazon A Ngelangel; Saibua Chichareon; Jennifer S Smith; Rolando Herrero; Victor Moreno; Silvia Franceschi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Circumcision policy statement. American Academy of Pediatrics. Task Force on Circumcision.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Costs and effectiveness of neonatal male circumcision.

Authors:  Seema Kacker; Kevin D Frick; Charlotte A Gaydos; Aaron A R Tobian
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2012-10

7.  Rates of adverse events associated with male circumcision in U.S. medical settings, 2001 to 2010.

Authors:  Charbel El Bcheraoui; Xinjian Zhang; Christopher S Cooper; Charles E Rose; Peter H Kilmarx; Robert T Chen
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 16.193

8.  Determinants and policy implications of male circumcision in the United States.

Authors:  Arleen A Leibowitz; Katherine Desmond; Thomas Belin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Heterosexual transmission of HIV--29 states, 1999-2002.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2004-02-20       Impact factor: 17.586

10.  Randomized, controlled intervention trial of male circumcision for reduction of HIV infection risk: the ANRS 1265 Trial.

Authors:  Bertran Auvert; Dirk Taljaard; Emmanuel Lagarde; Joëlle Sobngwi-Tambekou; Rémi Sitta; Adrian Puren
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2005-10-25       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  1 in total

1.  Circumcision and its alternatives in Germany: an analysis of nationwide hospital routine data.

Authors:  Christina Oetzmann von Sochaczewski; Jan Gödeke; Oliver J Muensterer
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2021-03-07       Impact factor: 2.264

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.