| Literature DB >> 24812573 |
Vassya Bankova1, Milena Popova1, Boryana Trusheva1.
Abstract
Propolis is a sticky material collected by bees from plants, and used in the hive as building material and defensive substance. It has been popular as a remedy in Europe since ancient times. Nowadays, propolis use in over-the-counter preparations, "bio"-cosmetics and functional foods, etc., increases. Volatile compounds are found in low concentrations in propolis, but their aroma and significant biological activity make them important for propolis characterisation. Propolis is a plant-derived product: its chemical composition depends on the local flora at the site of collection, thus it offers a significant chemical diversity. The role of propolis volatiles in identification of its plant origin is discussed. The available data about chemical composition of propolis volatiles from different geographic regions are reviewed, demonstrating significant chemical variability. The contribution of volatiles and their constituents to the biological activities of propolis is considered. Future perspectives in research on propolis volatiles are outlined, especially in studying activities other than antimicrobial.Entities:
Keywords: Biological activity; Plant origin; Propolis; Volatiles
Year: 2014 PMID: 24812573 PMCID: PMC4014088 DOI: 10.1186/1752-153X-8-28
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chem Cent J ISSN: 1752-153X Impact factor: 4.215
Propolis volatiles from different geographic origin
| DE | Albania | 0.3 | cadinene (10.5%), methoxyacetophenone (9.0%), sesquiterpene alcohol M = 222 (18.5%) | NT** | [ | 1994 |
| DE | Bulgaria | 0.3 | β-eudesmol (8.8%), δ-cadinen (5.3%), sesquiterpene alcohol M = 222 (15.5%) | Antibacterial | [ | 1994, 1999 |
| DE | China (Inner Mongolia) | NA*** | α –bisabolol (20.1%), 2-methyl-3-buten-2-ol (10.8%), 3-methyl-2-butene-1-ol (8.3%) | NT | [ | 2009 |
| DE | Mongolia | 0.6 | benzyl benzoate (8.6%), Sesquiterpene alcohol M = 222 (15.7%) | NT | [ | 1994 |
| DE | Brazil, stingless bees | 0.1 | antibacterial | [ | 1999 | |
| DE | Mexico (Yucatan) | 0.02 | α-pinene (11.9%), hexadecanoic acid (10.9%), | NT | [ | 2006 |
| DE | Mexico (Yucatan), stingless bees | 0.4 | α-pinene (17.6%), β-caryophyllene (11.8%), spatulenol (9.7%), caryophyllene oxide (9.5%), β-bourbonene (9.2%) | NT | [ | 2006 |
| DE | Canary islands | 0.1-0.3 | nerolidol (3.2 – 11.0%), spatulenol (3.2 – 8.4%), ledol (1.6 – 3.8%) | Antibacterial | [ | 2000 |
| HD | Croatia | 0.2 | limonene (6.4 – 10.5%), benzyl alcohol (3.1 – 18.2%), benzyl benzoate (3.6 – 4.4%) | NT | [ | 1996 |
| HD | Czech Republic | NA* | benzoic acid, benzyl alcohol, vanillin, eugenol | NT | [ | 1974 |
| HD | Greece | 0.03-0.1 | α –pinene (7.9 – 45.8%), trans-β-terpineol (2.2 – 6.6%), Junipene (1.5 – 11.7%), δ-cadinene (0.3 – 8.4) | Antibacterial | [ | 2007 |
| HD | Hungary | 0.3–1.5 | β-eudesmol, benzyl benzoate (2 types, one richer in benzyl benzoate) | Antibacterial | [ | 1988 |
| HD | India (Maharashtra state) | 3.2 | tricosane (13.6%), hexacosane (11.5%), palmitic acid (8.5%), linalool (6.7%), methyleugenol (6.0%) | Repellent activity against the honeybee | [ | 2013 |
| HS, HD | Italy (Northern) | NA | benzoic acid (3.1 – 30.1%), benzyl benzoate (0.2 – 13.1%), β-eudesmol (2.9 – 12.9%), δ-cadinene (1.3 – 13.3%), γ-cadinene (1.4 – 8.9%), Т-cadinol (2.7 – 10.0%), α-cadinol (4.8 – 9.7%) | NT | [ | 2013 |
| HD | Portugal | 0.05 | viridiflorol (9.0 – 39.0%), | NT | [ | 2013 |
| HD | China (Inner Mongolia) | NA | 3-methyl-2-buten-1-ol (26.8%), phenylethyl alcohol (17.1%), 2-methoxy-4-vinylphenol (9.5%) | NT | [ | 2009 |
| HD | Brazil | 0.4 | spatulenol (3.0 – 13.9%), (2Z,6E)-farnesol (1.6 – 14.9%), prenyl-acetophenone (0.2 – 8.7%), benzyl benzoate (0.3 – 18.3%) | NT | [ | 1998 |
| HD | Brazil | 0.1 | β-caryophyllene (12.7%), acetophenone (12.3%) | Antibacterial | [ | 2010 |
| HD | Brazil | NA | nerolidol (6.6%), trans-caryophyllene (4.1), spatulenol (3.6%) | NT | [ | 2008 |
| HD | Brazil (Minas Gerais State) | | (E)-nerolidol (17.1%), β-caryophyllene (13.4%), selina-3,7(11) diene (10.4%) | NT | [ | 2008 |
| HD | Brazil (Teresina, Piaui State) | NA | 1,8 – cineole (24.0%), exo-fenchol (11.3%), terpinen-4-ol (7.7%) | NT | [ | 2008 |
| HD | Brazil (Piaui State) | NA | α-pinene (0.3 – 34.4%), E-caryophyllene (2.6 – 17.4%), α-copaene (3.6 – 7.5%) | NT | [ | 2008 |
| HD | Brazil (Rio de Janeiro State) | 0.04 | α-pinene (18.3%), β-pinene (6.5%), δ-cadinene (7.0%) | Antifungal | [ | 2010 |
| HD | Brazil (Rio Grande do Sul State) | 3-3.8 | α-pinene (57.0 – 63.0%), β-pinene (12.5 – 30.8%), limonene (1.5 – 11.2%) | Antibacterial | [ | 2012 |
| HD | Ethiopia (Assela) | 0.9 | 5,6,7,8-tetramethylbicyclo [4,1,0] hept-4-en-3-one (15.0%), acoradiene (13.8%), epicedrol (6.8%) | NT | [ | 2012 |
| HD | Ethiopia (Haramaya) | 1.2 | calamenene (13.8%), 4-terpineol (8.6%), epi-bicyclosesquiphellandrene (8.4%) | NT | [ | 2012 |
| SHS | Estonia | NA | eucalyptol (25.9%), α-pinene (20.6%), benzaldehyde (10.8%), β-pinene (8.9%) | NT | [ | 2014 |
| SHS | China | NA | 3-methyl-3-butene-1-ol (40.3%), 3-methyl-2-butene-1-ol (11.6%), 4-penten-1-yl acetate (9.0%), α-longipinene (9.4%) | NT | [ | 2014 |
| SHS | Brazil | NA | α-pinene (52.5%), β-pinene (20.8%) | NT | [ | 2014 |
| SHS | Uruguay | NA | α-pinene (23.0 – 53.4%), β –pinene (24.1 – 27.4%), limonene (2.1 – 15.6%) | NT | [ | 2014 |
| HS | Italy (Southern) | NA | α-pinene (13.2%), germacrene D-4-ol (6.3%) | NT | [ | 2013 |
| HS | UK (Wales) | NA | 6-methylheptyl-5-en-2-one (16.0%), benzyl alcohol (14.2%), benzaldehyde (9.0%) | NT | [ | 1989 |
| HS | Argentina (Andean region) | NA | NT | [ | 2011 | |
| DHS | China (Inner Mongolia) | NA | heptadecane (7.0%), phenantrene (4.0%) | NT | [ | 2009 |
| DHS | China (Heilongjiang, Beijing) | NA | acetic acid (44.3 - 60.0%), benzyl alcohol (7.3 - 13.9%) | NT | [ | 2013 |
| DHS | China (Shanghai) | NA | acetic acid (25.3%), cedrene (10.4%), 3-methyl-3-buten-1-ol (7.1%) | NT | [ | 2013 |
| DHS | China (Shandong) | NA | acetic acid (11.4%), 1-(1,5-dimethyl-4-hexenyl)-4-methyl-benzene (9.7%), 1,2,3,4, 4a,5,6,8a-octahydro-4a,8-dimethyl-2-(1-methylethenyl)-naphthalene (8.3%), benzyl alcohol (7.4%) | NT | [ | 2013 |
| HS-SPME | Turkey (Eastern Anatolia) | NA | phenyl ethyl alcohol (7.7%), benzyl alcohol (7.4%), decanal (6.7%), ethyl benzoate (6.5%) | Antimicrobial, antioxidant | [ | 2013 |
| HS-SPME | Turkey (North Eastern Anatolia) | NA | cedrol (7.0 - 15.6%), α-bisabolol (14.3%), δ-cadinene (2.7 - 5.6%) | Antimicrobial, antioxidant | [ | 2013 |
| HS-SPME | Turkey (South Eastern Anatolia) | NA | α –terpinene (21.8%), α –terpineol (12.3%), junipene (9.1%), cinnamyl alcohol (8.7%), β-cariophyllene (8.1%) | NT | [ | 2004 |
| | Brazil, stingless | Bee legs samples | manool, totarol | NT | [ | 2002 |
| Extraction | France | 0.5 | β-eudesmol (30.0%), guaiol (10.0%), benzyl benzoate (8.0%) | NT | [ | 1981 |
| SD | Poland (Southern) | 1.2 of ethanol extract | farnesol, dihydroeudesmol, guaiol | antibacterial | [ | 1983 |
| UAE | Brazil | 5.4 in raw 0.3 in ethanol | nerolidol (10.4 – 14.7%), benzenepropanoic acid (14.9 – 20.8%) | NT | [ | 2013 |
| MAE | Brazil | longipinene (24.9%), α-eudesmol (6.9%), β-eudesmol (6.1%), β-caryophyllene (5.3%) | Therapeutic effect on anxiety | [ | 2012 |
*DE Distillation-extraction; HD hydrodestilation; SHS static headspace; HS headspace; DHS dynamic headspace; HS-SPME headspace solid-phase microextraction; SD steam destilation; UAE ultrasonic assisted extraction; MAE microwave assisted extraction. ** NT not tested; *** NA not available.