Literature DB >> 24810008

The effect of health insurance status on the treatment and outcomes of patients with colorectal cancer.

Alexander A Parikh1, Jamie Robinson, Victor M Zaydfudim, David Penson, Martin A Whiteside.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Uninsured and underinsured cancer patients often have delayed diagnosis and inferior outcomes. As healthcare reform proceeds in the US, this disparity may gain increasing importance. Our objective was to investigate the impact of health insurance status on the presentation, treatment, and survival among colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.
METHODS: A total of 10,692 patients diagnosed with CRC between 2004 and 2008 identified from the Tennessee Cancer Registry were stratified into five groups: Private, Medicare, Military, Medicaid, and uninsured. Multivariable regression models were constructed to test the association of insurance with receipt of recommended adjuvant therapy and overall survival (OS).
RESULTS: Uninsured and Medicaid patients were more often African American (AA) and presented with higher stage tumors (P < 0.001). Medicare patients were less likely to receive recommended adjuvant therapy (OR 0.54). Lack of insurance, Medicaid, and failure to receive recommended adjuvant therapy were independently associated with worse OS.
CONCLUSIONS: Although uninsured and Medicaid patients receive recommended adjuvant therapy comparable to other patients, they present with later stage disease and have a worse OS. Future studies are needed to better explain these disparities especially in the light of changing healthcare climate in the US.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adjuvant chemotherapy; colorectal cancer; disparities; health insurance; outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24810008     DOI: 10.1002/jso.23627

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  31 in total

1.  Use of radioiodine after thyroid lobectomy in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer: does it change outcomes?

Authors:  Colleen M Kiernan; Alexander A Parikh; Lee L Parks; Carmen C Solórzano
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Failure to administer recommended chemotherapy: acceptable variation or cancer care quality blind spot?

Authors:  Ryan J Ellis; Cary Jo R Schlick; Joe Feinglass; Mary F Mulcahy; Al B Benson; Sheetal M Kircher; Tony D Yang; David D Odell; Karl Bilimoria; Ryan P Merkow
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 7.035

3.  Disparities in guideline-concordant treatment for node-positive, non-small cell lung cancer following surgery.

Authors:  Norma E Farrow; Selena J An; Paul J Speicher; David H Harpole; Thomas A D'Amico; Jacob A Klapper; Matthew G Hartwig; Betty C Tong
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Socioeconomic disparities in health-related quality of life among colorectal cancer survivors.

Authors:  Jean A McDougall; Cindy K Blair; Charles L Wiggins; Michael B Goodwin; Vi K Chiu; Ashwani Rajput; Anita Y Kinney
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 4.442

5.  Differences in Breast Cancer Stage at Diagnosis by Ethnicity, Insurance Status, and Family Income in Young Women in the USA.

Authors:  Maria Alice Franzoi; Gilberto Schwartsmann; Sérgio Jobim de Azevedo; Guilherme Geib; Facundo Zaffaroni; Pedro E R Liedke
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2019-05-17

6.  Improving treatment and survival: a population-based study of current outcomes after a hepatic resection in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Victor M Zaydfudim; Timothy L McMurry; Amy M Harrigan; Charles M Friel; George J Stukenborg; Todd W Bauer; Reid B Adams; Traci L Hedrick
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 3.647

7.  Disparities in reportable quality metrics by insurance status in the primary spine neoplasm population.

Authors:  Syed K Mehdi; Joseph E Tanenbaum; Vincent J Alentado; Jacob A Miller; Daniel Lubelski; Edward C Benzel; Thomas E Mroz
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Association Between Geographic Access to Cancer Care, Insurance, and Receipt of Chemotherapy: Geographic Distribution of Oncologists and Travel Distance.

Authors:  Chun Chieh Lin; Suanna S Bruinooge; M Kelsey Kirkwood; Christine Olsen; Ahmedin Jemal; Dean Bajorin; Sharon H Giordano; Michael Goldstein; B Ashleigh Guadagnolo; Michael Kosty; Shane Hopkins; James B Yu; Anna Arnone; Amy Hanley; Stephanie Stevens; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  The influence of payor status on outcomes associated with surgical repair of upper gastrointestinal perforations due to peptic ulcer disease in the United States.

Authors:  Vijaya T Daniel; Didem Ayturk; Doyle V Ward; Beth A McCormick; Heena P Santry
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Health Insurance Status as a Predictor of Mode of Colon Cancer Detection but Not Stage at Diagnosis: Implications for Early Detection.

Authors:  Lindsey A Jones; Katherine C Brewer; Leslie R Carnahan; Jennifer A Parsons; Blase N Polite; Carol Estwing Ferrans; Richard B Warnecke; Garth H Rauscher
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 2.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.