Literature DB >> 26304878

Association Between Geographic Access to Cancer Care, Insurance, and Receipt of Chemotherapy: Geographic Distribution of Oncologists and Travel Distance.

Chun Chieh Lin1, Suanna S Bruinooge2, M Kelsey Kirkwood2, Christine Olsen2, Ahmedin Jemal2, Dean Bajorin2, Sharon H Giordano2, Michael Goldstein2, B Ashleigh Guadagnolo2, Michael Kosty2, Shane Hopkins2, James B Yu2, Anna Arnone2, Amy Hanley2, Stephanie Stevens2, Dawn L Hershman2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Geographic access to care may be associated with receipt of chemotherapy but has not been fully examined. This study sought to evaluate the association between density of oncologists and travel distance and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer within 90 days of colectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients in the National Cancer Data Base with stage III colon cancer, diagnosed between 2007 and 2010, and age 18 to 80 years were selected. Generalized estimating equation clustering by hospital service area was conducted to examine the association between geographic access and receipt of oncology services, controlling for patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.
RESULTS: Of 34,694 patients in the study cohort, 75.7% received adjuvant chemotherapy within 90 days of colectomy. Compared with travel distance less than 12.5 miles, patients who traveled 50 to 249 miles (odds ratio [OR], 0.87; P=.009) or ≥250 miles (OR, 0.36; P<.001) had decreased likelihood of receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Density level of oncologists was not statistically associated with receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy (low v high density: OR, 0.98; P=.77). When stratifying analyses by insurance status, non-privately insured patients who resided in areas with low density of oncologists were less likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy (OR, 0.85; P=.03).
CONCLUSION: Increased travel burden was associated with a decreased likelihood of receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, regardless of insurance status. Patients with nonprivate insurance who resided in low-density oncologist areas were less likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy. If these findings are validated prospectively, interventions to decrease geographic barriers may improve the timeliness and quality of colon cancer treatment.
© 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26304878      PMCID: PMC4979096          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.1558

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  43 in total

1.  Data sources for measuring comorbidity: a comparison of hospital records and medicare claims for cancer patients.

Authors:  Carrie N Klabunde; Linda C Harlan; Joan L Warren
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Increasing supplies of dermatologists and family physicians are associated with earlier stage of melanoma detection.

Authors:  R G Roetzheim; N Pal; D J van Durme; D Wathington; J M Ferrante; E C Gonzalez; J P Krischer
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 11.527

3.  Geographic access to cancer care: a disparity and a solution.

Authors:  Anesa Ahamad
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  Higher physician density is associated with lower incidence of late-stage colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan; Raymond G Hoffmann; Kia Saeian
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-07-24       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Relationship between physician supply and breast cancer survival: a geographic approach.

Authors:  Jay M Fleisher; Jennie Q Lou; Maria Farrell
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2008-08

6.  A refined comorbidity measurement algorithm for claims-based studies of breast, prostate, colorectal, and lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Carrie N Klabunde; Julie M Legler; Joan L Warren; Laura-Mae Baldwin; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 3.797

7.  Association between the availability of medical oncologists and initiation of chemotherapy for patients with stage III colon cancer.

Authors:  Chun Chieh Lin; Katherine S Virgo
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.840

8.  Influence of place of residence in access to specialized cancer care for African Americans.

Authors:  Tracy Onega; Eric J Duell; Xun Shi; Eugene Demidenko; David Goodman
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Access to cancer services for rural colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Laura-Mae Baldwin; Yong Cai; Eric H Larson; Sharon A Dobie; George E Wright; David C Goodman; Barbara Matthews; L Gary Hart
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.333

10.  Effects of residence and race on burden of travel for care: cross sectional analysis of the 2001 US National Household Travel Survey.

Authors:  Janice C Probst; Sarah B Laditka; Jong-Yi Wang; Andrew O Johnson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-03-09       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  59 in total

1.  At What Cost to Clinical Trial Enrollment? A Retrospective Study of Patient Travel Burden in Cancer Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Hala T Borno; Li Zhang; Adam Siegel; Emily Chang; Charles J Ryan
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-04-26

2.  System-Level Factors Associated With Use of Outpatient Specialty Palliative Care Among Patients With Advanced Cancer.

Authors:  Justin A Yu; Kristin N Ray; Seo Young Park; Amanda Barry; Cardinale B Smith; Peter G Ellis; Yael Schenker
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  Influence of travel burden on tumor classification and survival of head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  J M Vahl; A von Witzleben; C Welke; J Doescher; M N Theodoraki; M Brand; P J Schuler; J Greve; T K Hoffmann; S Laban
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Racial Differences in Geographic Access to Medical Care as Measured by Patient Report and Geographic Information Systems.

Authors:  Michelle S Wong; David T Grande; Nandita Mitra; Archana Radhakrishnan; Charles C Branas; Katelyn R Ward; Craig E Pollack
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Rural and urban patients with diffuse large B-cell and follicular lymphoma experience reduced overall survival: a National Cancer DataBase study.

Authors:  Andrew J Ritter; Jordan S Goldstein; Amy A Ayers; Christopher R Flowers
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2019-01-11

6.  Structural barriers to comprehensive, coordinated HIV care: geographic accessibility in the US South.

Authors:  April D Kimmel; Steven P Masiano; Rose S Bono; Erika G Martin; Faye Z Belgrave; Adaora A Adimora; Bassam Dahman; Hadiza Galadima; Lindsay M Sabik
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  2018-05-30

7.  The State of Cancer Care in America, 2016: A Report by the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 3.840

8.  Disparities in Geographic Accessibility of National Cancer Institute Cancer Centers in the United States.

Authors:  Yanqing Xu; Cong Fu; Tracy Onega; Xun Shi; Fahui Wang
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 4.460

9.  Impact of Travel Time on Health Care Costs and Resource Use by Phase of Care for Older Patients With Cancer.

Authors:  Gabrielle B Rocque; Courtney P Williams; Harold D Miller; Andres Azuero; Stephanie B Wheeler; Maria Pisu; Olivia Hull; Rodney P Rocconi; Kelly M Kenzik
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  A multidimensional view of racial differences in access to prostate cancer care.

Authors:  Craig Evan Pollack; Katrina A Armstrong; Nandita Mitra; Xinwei Chen; Katelyn R Ward; Archana Radhakrishnan; Michelle S Wong; Justin E Bekelman; Charles C Branas; Karin V Rhodes; David T Grande
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.