Literature DB >> 27664341

Disparities in reportable quality metrics by insurance status in the primary spine neoplasm population.

Syed K Mehdi1, Joseph E Tanenbaum2, Vincent J Alentado3, Jacob A Miller4, Daniel Lubelski5, Edward C Benzel6, Thomas E Mroz7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) defines "adverse quality events" as the incidence of certain complications such as postsurgical hematoma or iatrogenic pneumothorax during an inpatient stay. Patient safety indicators (PSI) are a means to measure the incidence of these adverse events. When adverse events occur, reimbursement to the hospital decreases. The incidence of adverse quality events among patients hospitalized for primary spinal neoplasms is unknown. Similarly, it is unclear what the impact of insurance status is on adverse care quality among this patient population.
PURPOSE: We aimed to determine the incidence of PSI among patients admitted with primary spinal neoplasms, and to determine the association between insurance status and the incidence of PSI in this population. STUDY
DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: We included all patients, 18 years and older, in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) who were hospitalized for primary spine neoplasms from 1998 to 2011. OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of PSI from 1998 to 2011 served as outcome variable.
METHODS: The NIS was queried for all hospitalizations with a diagnosis of primary spinal neoplasm during the inpatient episode from 1998 to 2011. Incidence of PSI was determined using publicly available lists of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis codes. Logistic regression models were used to determine the effect of primary payer status on PSI incidence. All comparisons were made between privately insured patients and Medicaid or self-pay patients.
RESULTS: We identified 6,095 hospitalizations in which a primary spinal neoplasm was recorded during the inpatient episode. We excluded patients younger than 18 years and those with "other" or "missing" primary insurance status, leaving 5,880 patients for analysis. After adjusting for patient demographics and hospital characteristics, Medicaid or self-pay patients had significantly greater odds of experiencing one or more PSI (odds ratio [OR] 1.81 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-2.95) relative to privately insured patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients hospitalized for primary spinal neoplasms, primary payer status predicts the incidence of PSI, an indicator of adverse health-care quality used to determine hospital reimbursement by the CMS. As reimbursement continues to be intertwined with reportable quality metrics, identifying vulnerable populations is critical to improving patient care.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Affordable Care Act; Insurance status; NIS; Patient outcome; Patient safety indicator; Spinal neoplasm

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27664341      PMCID: PMC5493960          DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  34 in total

1.  Misclassification and selection bias in case-control studies using an automated database.

Authors:  J M Evans; T M MacDonald
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.890

Review 2.  Benign tumors of the spine.

Authors:  Nikhil A Thakur; Alan H Daniels; Jonathan Schiller; Mauricio A Valdes; John K Czerwein; Alan Schiller; Sean Esmende; Richard M Terek
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Benchmarking statewide trauma mortality using Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's patient safety indicators.

Authors:  Darwin Ang; Mark McKenney; Scott Norwood; Stanley Kurek; Brian Kimbrell; Huazhi Liu; Michele Ziglar; James Hurst
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 2.192

4.  Long-term outcomes in primary spinal osteochondroma: a multicenter study of 27 patients.

Authors:  Daniel M Sciubba; Mohamed Macki; Mohamad Bydon; Niccole M Germscheid; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Stefano Boriani; Chetan Bettegowda; Dean Chou; Alessandro Luzzati; Jeremy J Reynolds; Zsolt Szövérfi; Patti Zadnik; Laurence D Rhines; Ziya L Gokaslan; Charles G Fisher; Peter Paul Varga
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2015-03-20

5.  Racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in patient outcomes after craniotomy for tumor in adult patients in the United States, 1988-2004.

Authors:  William T Curry; Bob S Carter; Fred G Barker
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Descriptive epidemiology of malignant and nonmalignant primary spinal cord, spinal meninges, and cauda equina tumors, United States, 2004-2007.

Authors:  Linh M Duong; Bridget J McCarthy; Roger E McLendon; Therese A Dolecek; Carol Kruchko; Lynda L Douglas; Umed A Ajani
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Medicaid status is associated with higher complication rates after spine surgery.

Authors:  Jacques Hacquebord; Amy M Cizik; Sree Harsha Malempati; Mark A Konodi; Richard J Bransford; Carlo Bellabarba; Jens Chapman; Michael J Lee
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Primary payer status is significantly associated with postoperative mortality, morbidity, and hospital resource utilization in pediatric surgical patients within the United States.

Authors:  Matthew L Stone; Damien J LaPar; Daniel P Mulloy; Sara K Rasmussen; Bartholomew J Kane; Eugene D McGahren; Bradley M Rodgers
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.545

9.  Disparities in the outcomes of lumbar spinal stenosis surgery based on insurance status.

Authors:  Shivanand P Lad; Kevin T Huang; Jacob H Bagley; Matthew A Hazzard; Ranjith Babu; Timothy Ryan Owens; Beatrice Ugiliweneza; Chirag G Patil; Maxwell Boakye
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  The Impact of Socioeconomic Status on the Utilization of Spinal Imaging.

Authors:  Adeeb Derakhshan; Jacob Miller; Daniel Lubelski; Amy S Nowacki; Brian J Wells; Alex Milinovich; Edward C Benzel; Thomas E Mroz; Michael P Steinmetz
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.654

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.