Literature DB >> 24808625

NEW MDS AND CLUSTERING BASED ALGORITHMS FOR PROTEIN MODEL QUALITY ASSESSMENT AND SELECTION.

Qingguo Wang1, Charles Shang2, Dong Xu3, Yi Shang3.   

Abstract

In protein tertiary structure prediction, assessing the quality of predicted models is an essential task. Over the past years, many methods have been proposed for the protein model quality assessment (QA) and selection problem. Despite significant advances, the discerning power of current methods is still unsatisfactory. In this paper, we propose two new algorithms, CC-Select and MDS-QA, based on multidimensional scaling and k-means clustering. For the model selection problem, CC-Select combines consensus with clustering techniques to select the best models from a given pool. Given a set of predicted models, CC-Select first calculates a consensus score for each structure based on its average pairwise structural similarity to other models. Then, similar structures are grouped into clusters using multidimensional scaling and clustering algorithms. In each cluster, the one with the highest consensus score is selected as a candidate model. For the QA problem, MDS-QA combines single-model scoring functions with consensus to determine more accurate assessment score for every model in a given pool. Using extensive benchmark sets of a large collection of predicted models, we compare the two algorithms with existing state-of-the-art quality assessment methods and show significant improvement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Protein tertiary structure prediction; clustering; consensus method; model quality assessment; multidimensional scaling

Year:  2013        PMID: 24808625      PMCID: PMC4010235          DOI: 10.1142/S0218213013600063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Artif Intell Tools        ISSN: 0218-2130            Impact factor:   1.208


  20 in total

1.  Protein structure prediction and structural genomics.

Authors:  D Baker; A Sali
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-10-05       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  3D-Jury: a simple approach to improve protein structure predictions.

Authors:  Krzysztof Ginalski; Arne Elofsson; Daniel Fischer; Leszek Rychlewski
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-05-22       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  SPICKER: a clustering approach to identify near-native protein folds.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-04-30       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-12-01

5.  Pcons5: combining consensus, structural evaluation and fold recognition scores.

Authors:  Björn Wallner; Arne Elofsson
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-10-04       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures.

Authors:  Min-Yi Shen; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Exploring protein energy landscapes with hierarchical clustering.

Authors:  Dominik Gront; Ulrich H E Hansmann; Andrzej Kolinski
Journal:  Int J Quantum Chem       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.444

8.  Assessment of predictions in the model quality assessment category.

Authors:  Domenico Cozzetto; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Michele Ceriani; Anna Tramontano
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2007

9.  Evaluation of CASP8 model quality predictions.

Authors:  Domenico Cozzetto; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Anna Tramontano
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009

10.  Rapid model quality assessment for protein structure predictions using the comparison of multiple models without structural alignments.

Authors:  Liam J McGuffin; Daniel B Roche
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 6.937

View more
  1 in total

1.  MQAPRank: improved global protein model quality assessment by learning-to-rank.

Authors:  Xiaoyang Jing; Qiwen Dong
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 3.169

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.