Literature DB >> 24808439

Acoustic noise reduction in MRI using Silent Scan: an initial experience.

Sedat Alibek1, Mika Vogel, Wei Sun, David Winkler, Christopher A Baker, Michael Burke, Hubertus Gloger.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Acoustic noise during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the main source for patient discomfort and leads to verbal communication problems, difficulties in sedation, and hearing impairment. Silent Scan technology uses less changes in gradient excitation levels, which is directly related to noise levels. Here, we report our preliminary experience with this technique in neuroimaging with regard to subjective and objective noise levels and image quality.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients underwent routine brain MRI with 3 Tesla MR750w system and 12-channel head coil. T1-weighted gradient echo (BRAVO) and Silenz pulse sequence (TE=0, 3D radial center-out k-space filling and data sampling with relatively small gradient steps) were performed. Patients rated subjective sound impression for both sequences on a 6-point scale. Objective sound level measurements were performed with a dedicated device in gantry at different operation modes. Image quality was subjectively assessed in consensus by two radiologists on a 3-point scale.
RESULTS: Readers rated image quality as fully diagnostic in all patients. Measured mean noise was reduced significantly with Silenz sequence (68.8 dB vs. 104.65 dB with BRAVO, P = 0.024) corresponding to 34.3% reduction in sound intensity and 99,97% reduction in sound pressure. No significant difference was observed between Silenz sound levels and ambient sounds (i.e., background noise in the scanner room, 68.8 dB vs. 68.73 dB, P = 0.5). The patients' subjective sound level score was lower for Silenz compared with conventional sequence (1.1 vs. 2.3, P = 0.003).
CONCLUSION: T1-weighted Silent Scan is a promising technique for acoustic noise reduction and improved patient comfort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24808439      PMCID: PMC4463276          DOI: 10.5152/dir.2014.13458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1305-3825            Impact factor:   2.630


  6 in total

Review 1.  Auditory noise associated with MR procedures: a review.

Authors:  M McJury; F G Shellock
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Active-passive gradient shielding for MRI acoustic noise reduction.

Authors:  William A Edelstein; Tesfaye K Kidane; Victor Taracila; Tanvir N Baig; Timothy P Eagan; Yu-Chung N Cheng; Robert W Brown; John A Mallick
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Ultra-fast imaging using low flip angles and FIDs.

Authors:  D P Madio; I J Lowe
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Effect of headphones on sevoflurane requirement for MRI.

Authors:  Mustafa Oğurlu; Mehmet Emin Orhan; Salih Çinar; Ertan Piri; Ercan Kurt; Necdet Sut; Alparslan Turan
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-08-12

5.  Potential hearing loss resulting from MR imaging.

Authors:  R E Brummett; J M Talbot; P Charuhas
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Verbal communication in MR environments: effect of MR system acoustic noise on speech understanding.

Authors:  Adriaan Moelker; Ronald A J J Maas; Peter M T Pattynama
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 11.105

  6 in total
  32 in total

Review 1.  MRI evaluation and safety in the developing brain.

Authors:  Shannon Tocchio; Beth Kline-Fath; Emanuel Kanal; Vincent J Schmithorst; Ashok Panigrahy
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 3.300

2.  Zero TE MRI for Craniofacial Bone Imaging.

Authors:  A Lu; K R Gorny; M-L Ho
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Comparison of lung imaging using three-dimensional ultrashort echo time and zero echo time sequences: preliminary study.

Authors:  Kyungsoo Bae; Kyung Nyeo Jeon; Moon Jung Hwang; Joon Sung Lee; Ji Young Ha; Kyeong Hwa Ryu; Ho Cheol Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Follow-up assessment of coiled intracranial aneurysms using zTE MRA as compared with TOF MRA: a preliminary image quality study.

Authors:  Song'an Shang; Jing Ye; Xianfu Luo; Jianxun Qu; Yong Zhen; Jingtao Wu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  How Can New Imaging Modalities Help in the Practice of Radiology?

Authors:  Berhan Pirimoglu; Recep Sade; Hayri Ogul; Mecit Kantarci; Suat Eren; Akın Levent
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2016-10

6.  Validation of Zero TE-MRA in the Characterization of Cerebrovascular Diseases: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  S Shang; J Ye; W Dou; X Luo; J Qu; Q Zhu; H Zhang; J Wu
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Visualization of Aneurysmal Neck and Dome after Coiling with 3D Multifusion Imaging of Silent MRA and FSE-MR Cisternography.

Authors:  T Satoh; T Hishikawa; M Hiramatsu; K Sugiu; I Date
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Robust Motion Correction Strategy for Structural MRI in Unsedated Children Demonstrated with Three-dimensional Radial MPnRAGE.

Authors:  Steven Kecskemeti; Alexey Samsonov; Julia Velikina; Aaron S Field; Patrick Turski; Howard Rowley; Janet E Lainhart; Andrew L Alexander
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Image quality assessment of silent T2 PROPELLER sequence for brain imaging in infants.

Authors:  Hyun Gi Kim; Jin Wook Choi; Soo Han Yoon; Sieun Lee
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Comparison of image quality characteristics on Silent MR versus conventional MR imaging of brain lesions at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Susanne Ohlmann-Knafo; Melanie Morlo; David Laszlo Tarnoki; Adam Domonkos Tarnoki; Barbara Grabowski; Melanie Kaspar; Dirk Pickuth
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.