Literature DB >> 24807253

Sexual conflict over mating in Gnatocerus cornutus? Females prefer lovers not fighters.

Kensuke Okada1, Masako Katsuki, Manmohan D Sharma, Clarissa M House, David J Hosken.   

Abstract

Female mate choice and male-male competition are the typical mechanisms of sexual selection. However, these two mechanisms do not always favour the same males. Furthermore, it has recently become clear that female choice can sometimes benefit males that reduce female fitness. So whether male-male competition and female choice favour the same or different males, and whether or not females benefit from mate choice, remain open questions. In the horned beetle, Gnatocerus cornutus, males have enlarged mandibles used to fight rivals, and larger mandibles provide a mating advantage when there is direct male-male competition for mates. However, it is not clear whether females prefer these highly competitive males. Here, we show that female choice targets male courtship rather than mandible size, and these two characters are not phenotypically or genetically correlated. Mating with attractive, highly courting males provided indirect benefits to females but only via the heritability of male attractiveness. However, mating with attractive males avoids the indirect costs to daughters that are generated by mating with competitive males. Our results suggest that male-male competition may constrain female mate choice, possibly reducing female fitness and generating sexual conflict over mating.

Entities:  

Keywords:  direct benefits; heritability; indirect benefits; sexual selection

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24807253      PMCID: PMC4024292          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  47 in total

1.  Female feral fowl eject sperm of subdominant males.

Authors:  T Pizzari; T R Birkhead
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Female choice of sexually antagonistic male adaptations: a critical review of some current research.

Authors:  C Cordero; W G Eberhard
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.411

3.  An ecologist's guide to the animal model.

Authors:  Alastair J Wilson; Denis Réale; Michelle N Clements; Michael M Morrissey; Erik Postma; Craig A Walling; Loeske E B Kruuk; Daniel H Nussey
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.091

4.  Genotype-by-environment interactions for female preference.

Authors:  C Narraway; J Hunt; N Wedell; D J Hosken
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 2.411

5.  Dispersal and ejaculatory strategies associated with exaggeration of weapon in an armed beetle.

Authors:  Takashi Yamane; Kensuke Okada; Satoshi Nakayama; Takahisa Miyatake
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Immature performance linked with exaggeration of a sexually selected trait in an armed beetle.

Authors:  K Okada; M Katsuki; Y Okada; T Miyatake
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 2.411

7.  Male fitness increases when females are eliminated from gene pool: implications for the Y chromosome.

Authors:  W R Rice
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-05-26       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Female fifteen-spined sticklebacks prefer better fathers.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 9.  The role of genotype-by-environment interactions in sexual selection.

Authors:  F C Ingleby; J Hunt; D J Hosken
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 2.411

10.  Intralocus sexual conflict diminishes the benefits of sexual selection.

Authors:  Alison Pischedda; Adam K Chippindale
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  8 in total

1.  Loser-effect duration evolves independently of fighting ability.

Authors:  Kensuke Okada; Yasukazu Okada; Sasha R X Dall; David J Hosken
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Male Scent Gland Signals Mating Status in Greater Spear-Nosed Bats, Phyllostomus hastatus.

Authors:  Danielle M Adams; Yue Li; Gerald S Wilkinson
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  What do orange spots reveal about male (and female) guppies? A test using correlated responses to selection.

Authors:  Magdalena Herdegen-Radwan; Silvia Cattelan; Jakub Buda; Jarosław Raubic; Jacek Radwan
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 4.171

4.  Sexually antagonistic selection on genetic variation underlying both male and female same-sex sexual behavior.

Authors:  David Berger; Tao You; Maravillas R Minano; Karl Grieshop; Martin I Lind; Göran Arnqvist; Alexei A Maklakov
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.260

5.  Constrained evolution of the sex comb in Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  M S Maraqa; R Griffin; M D Sharma; A J Wilson; J Hunt; D J Hosken; C M House
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 2.411

6.  Sexual Selection on male cuticular hydrocarbons via male-male competition and female choice.

Authors:  S M Lane; A W Dickinson; T Tregenza; C M House
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 2.411

7.  Pre and Post-copulatory Selection Favor Similar Genital Phenotypes in the Male Broad Horned Beetle.

Authors:  Clarissa M House; M D Sharma; Kensuke Okada; David J Hosken
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.326

8.  Complex interactions between sperm viability and female fertility.

Authors:  Maximiliano Tourmente; C Ruth Archer; David J Hosken
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.