Literature DB >> 9819334

Female fifteen-spined sticklebacks prefer better fathers.

.   

Abstract

We studied how male fifteen-spined sticklebacks, Spinachia spinachia, vary in paternal competence, whether males advertise their competence and whether females prefer better fathers. In this species the male alone provides care for the offspring through nest building, fanning, cleaning and protecting the eggs. We found no female preference for larger males. Instead, females preferred males that during the subsequent paternal phase fanned their nests in shorter fanning bouts. Such males enjoyed a significantly higher hatching success because they fanned more often than males with longer fanning bouts. Males that fanned for short bouts during the paternal phase were also able to increase their fin beat rate. Frequent fanning and high fin beat rates may improve the flow of oxygen to the eggs. Beat rate may be a condition-dependent trait, because males that lost more weight were unable to increase their fin beat rate. During courtship, males perform behaviours such as displacement fanning and body shaking. Females preferred males showing more frequent body shakes during courtship. Body shake frequency correlated positively with hatching success, and negatively with mean fanning bout duration during the paternal phase. The results indicate that female S. spinachia show a preference for direct benefits in terms of better paternal care, and that males may signal this ability to females by shaking their body during courtship. Copyright 1998 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 9819334     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0878

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  14 in total

1.  Social fishes and single mothers: brain evolution in African cichlids.

Authors:  Alejandro Gonzalez-Voyer; Svante Winberg; Niclas Kolm
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Will male advertisement be a reliable indicator of paternal care, if offspring survival depends on male care?

Authors:  Natasha B Kelly; Suzanne H Alonzo
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Mate choice and sexual selection: what have we learned since Darwin?

Authors:  Adam G Jones; Nicholas L Ratterman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Multiple mating and clutch size in invertebrate brooders versus pregnant vertebrates.

Authors:  John C Avise; Andrey Tatarenkov; Jin-Xian Liu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Sexual conflict over mating in Gnatocerus cornutus? Females prefer lovers not fighters.

Authors:  Kensuke Okada; Masako Katsuki; Manmohan D Sharma; Clarissa M House; David J Hosken
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Pectoral fins and paternal quality in sticklebacks.

Authors:  R Künzler; T C Bakker
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  The costs and benefits of paternal care in fish: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rebecca L Goldberg; Philip A Downing; Ashleigh S Griffin; Jonathan P Green
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Compatibility drives female preference and reproductive success in the monogamous California mouse (Peromyscus californicus) more strongly than male testosterone measures.

Authors:  Erin D Gleason; Mary A Holschbach; Catherine A Marler
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 3.587

9.  Testosterone response to courtship predicts future paternal behavior in the California mouse, Peromyscus californicus.

Authors:  Erin D Gleason; Catherine A Marler
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 3.587

10.  Do male desert gobies compromise offspring care to attract additional mating opportunities?

Authors:  Nicholas Symons; P Andreas Svensson; Bob B M Wong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.