Literature DB >> 20939836

Genotype-by-environment interactions for female preference.

C Narraway1, J Hunt, N Wedell, D J Hosken.   

Abstract

Sexual selection is responsible for many of the most spectacular displays in nature, and female preference for certain males is central to much of this. However, female preference is relatively poorly understood, particularly the relative importance of a female's genes, the environment and their interaction on her preference. We investigated preference in a no-choice design using Drosophila melanogaster iso-female lines and find that there are genotype-by-environment interactions for female preference. Whereas the choosiness of some female genotypes differed little across environments, that of others differed greatly, so that the choosiness rank of females in one environment did not necessarily predict their rank in another. Furthermore, the genetic variance underlying preference also varied across environments. These findings have important consequences for the evolution of female preference and the male sexual traits preference targets.
© 2010 The Authors. Journal Compilation © 2010 European Society For Evolutionary Biology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20939836     DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02113.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  11 in total

1.  Bias in the heritability of preference and its potential impact on the evolution of mate choice.

Authors:  D A Roff; D J Fairbairn
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Sexual conflict over mating in Gnatocerus cornutus? Females prefer lovers not fighters.

Authors:  Kensuke Okada; Masako Katsuki; Manmohan D Sharma; Clarissa M House; David J Hosken
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Genotype-by-environment interactions for female mate choice of male cuticular hydrocarbons in Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  Fiona C Ingleby; John Hunt; David J Hosken
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Personality may confound common measures of mate-choice.

Authors:  Morgan David; Frank Cézilly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Incestuous sisters: mate preference for brothers over unrelated males in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Adeline Loyau; Jérémie H Cornuau; Jean Clobert; Etienne Danchin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Multiple paternity in wild house mice (Mus musculus musculus): effects on offspring genetic diversity and body mass.

Authors:  Kerstin E Thonhauser; Michaela Thoß; Kerstin Musolf; Teresa Klaus; Dustin J Penn
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Environmental quality alters female costs and benefits of evolving under enforced monogamy.

Authors:  Vera M Grazer; Marco Demont; Łukasz Michalczyk; Matthew J G Gage; Oliver Y Martin
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  Investigating climate change and reproduction: experimental tools from evolutionary biology.

Authors:  Vera M Grazer; Oliver Y Martin
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2012-09-13

9.  The evolution of phenotypes and genetic parameters under preferential mating.

Authors:  Derek A Roff; Daphne J Fairbairn
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Hemiclonal analysis of interacting phenotypes in male and female Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Hannah M E Tennant; Erin E Sonser; Tristan A f Long
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2014-05-03       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.