Literature DB >> 24799424

Extra-articular ACL Reconstruction and Pivot Shift: In Vivo Dynamic Evaluation With Navigation.

Edoardo Monaco1, Barbara Maestri2, Fabio Conteduca1, Daniele Mazza1, Carlo Iorio1, Andrea Ferretti1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The pivot-shift test is considered a reliable examination to evaluate the results of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, as it strongly correlates with patient satisfaction, giving-way episodes, and activity level. The addition of lateral tenodesis (LT) to current techniques of intra-articular reconstruction with a hamstring graft could potentially improve knee laxity in cases of severe rotational instability.
PURPOSE: To biomechanically investigate the effect of intra- and extra-articular ACL reconstructions on knee laxity and the pivot-shift phenomenon. STUDY
DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study.
METHODS: Twenty patients underwent anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction with doubled semitendinosus and gracilis tendons with the addition of extra-articular reconstruction. In patients in group A, intra-articular reconstruction was performed first and LT thereafter; in patients in group B, LT was performed first and intra-articular reconstruction thereafter. A navigator equipped with software designed for both static and dynamic evaluations was used to measure maximum anterior tibial translation (ATT) and axial tibial rotation (ATR) at 30° of flexion (static evaluation) and during the pivot-shift test (dynamic evaluation). Measurements were performed before reconstruction, after the first procedure, and after the second procedure.
RESULTS: For the static evaluation, in group A, the mean ATT significantly decreased from 14.1 ± 3.7 mm in the preoperative (ACL-deficient) condition to 6.0 ± 1.9 mm after ACL reconstruction and to 5.3 ± 1.6 mm after LT. The mean ATR at 30° of knee flexion significantly decreased from 35.7° ± 4.8° to 28.9° ± 4.1° and to 20.9° ± 4.8°, respectively. In group B, the mean ATT significantly decreased from 13.5 ± 6.5 mm in the preoperative (ACL-deficient) condition to 10.2 ± 3.2 mm after LT and to 4.0 ± 1.6 mm after ACL reconstruction. The mean ATR at 30° of knee flexion significantly decreased from 36.7° ± 4.8° to 26.2° ± 6.2° and to 23.5° ± 4.9°, respectively. For the dynamic evaluation (pivot-shift test), in group A, the mean ATT significantly decreased from 15.0 ± 6.8 mm in the preoperative (ACL-deficient) condition to 9.4 ± 6.4 mm after ACL reconstruction and to 8.5 ± 5.4 mm after LT. The mean ATR significantly decreased from 16.9° ± 4.7° to 11.6° ± 4.1° and to 6.1° ± 2.2°, respectively. In group B, the mean ATT significantly decreased from 12.5 ± 3.3 mm in the preoperative (ACL-deficient) condition to 9.1 ± 5.9 mm after LT and to 8.1 ± 5.4 mm after ACL reconstruction. The mean ATR significantly decreased from 16.0° ± 4.5° to 9.2° ± 4.3° and to 7.5° ± 4.0°, respectively. CONCLUSION/CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Extra-articular reconstruction had little effect in reducing the anterior displacement of the tibia at 30° of flexion, but it was more effective than intra-articular reconstruction in reducing ATR. Anatomic ACL reconstruction and LT were synergic in controlling the pivot-shift phenomenon.
© 2014 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL reconstruction; computer navigation; lateral tenodesis; pivot shift

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24799424     DOI: 10.1177/0363546514532336

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  28 in total

1.  The anterolateral ligament of the knee: a radiologic and histotopographic study.

Authors:  Veronica Macchi; Andrea Porzionato; Aldo Morra; Carla Stecco; Cinzia Tortorella; Mirco Menegolo; Bruno Grignon; Raffaele De Caro
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2015-10-17       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 2.  Anterolateral rotatory instability of the knee.

Authors:  Daniel Guenther; Chad Griffith; Bryson Lesniak; Nicola Lopomo; Alberto Grassi; Stefano Zaffagnini; Freddie H Fu; Volker Musahl
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Characterization of the anatomy of the anterolateral ligament of the knee using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jonathan D Kosy; Vipul I Mandalia; Rahul Anaspure
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  The magnetic resonance imaging appearance of the anterolateral ligament of the knee in association with anterior cruciate rupture.

Authors:  Jonathan D Kosy; Peter J Schranz; Anish Patel; Rahul Anaspure; Vipul I Mandalia
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Identification of the Anterolateral Ligament on Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Karan A Patel; Anikar Chhabra; Jill A Goodwin; David E Hartigan
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-01-30

Review 6.  Clinical outcomes of extra-articular tenodesis/anterolateral reconstruction in the ACL injured knee.

Authors:  Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet; Nuno Camelo Barbosa; Thais Dutra Vieira; Adnan Saithna
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  The Pivot Shift: Current Experimental Methodology and Clinical Utility for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture and Associated Injury.

Authors:  Nicholas J Vaudreuil; Benjamin B Rothrauff; Darren de Sa; Volker Musahl
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2019-03

8.  Anterolateral Extra-articular Soft Tissue Reconstruction in Anterolateral Rotatory Instability of the Knee.

Authors:  Willem A Kernkamp; Samuel K van de Velde; Eric W P Bakker; Ewoud R A van Arkel
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2015-12-28

Review 9.  Truly Existing or Hyped up? Unravelling the Current Knowledge Regarding the Anatomy, Radiology, Histology and Biomechanics of the Enigmatic Anterolateral Ligament of the Knee Joint.

Authors:  Dinesh Kumar V; Yogesh Ashok Sontakke; Sontakke Murugharaj
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2020-05

10.  In Vivo Anterolateral Ligament Length Change in the Healthy Knee During Functional Activities-A Combined Magnetic Resonance and Dual Fluoroscopic Imaging Analysis.

Authors:  Willem A Kernkamp; Samuel K Van de Velde; Ali Hosseini; Tsung-Yuan Tsai; Jing-Sheng Li; Ewoud R A van Arkel; Guoan Li
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 4.772

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.