Jonathan D Kosy1, Peter J Schranz2, Anish Patel2, Rahul Anaspure2, Vipul I Mandalia2. 1. Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Centre, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Barrack Road, Exeter, EX2 5DW, UK. jonkosy@yahoo.co.uk. 2. Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Centre, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Barrack Road, Exeter, EX2 5DW, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) appearance of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) has been described. However, the appearance of this structure and injury, in the presence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, is less well defined. We studied the incidence of injury to the ALL and the pattern of this injury on MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following Institutional Review Board approval, a retrospective study of 375 consecutive MRI studies was performed. Cases were identified from a prospective database of ACL reconstruction patients. Following exclusions, 280 MRIs (277 patients; 197 males: 80 females; mean age 30.2 years, range, 16-54) were evaluated. Injury was defined as full thickness, partial thickness, or an avulsion fracture. Each study was independently assessed by two consultant musculoskeletal radiologists. RESULTS: Injury to the ALL was identified (by at least one observer) in only 10.7% of cases (2.50% full thickness, 7.50% partial thickness, and 0.71% avulsion fracture). There was an almost perfect level of interobserver agreement for both the identification of an injury (κ = 0.854) and grading of injury (κ = 0.858). The MRI incidence of ALL injury was significantly greater within 6 weeks of the knee injury (18.5 vs. 8.37%; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: ALL injury was identified in only one-tenth of cases of ACL rupture. MRI changes can be reliably identified with strong agreement between observers. ALL injury is found more frequently on MRI within 6 weeks of the knee injury (compared to scans performed after this time period) suggesting that some injuries may resolve or become less visible.
OBJECTIVE: The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) appearance of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) has been described. However, the appearance of this structure and injury, in the presence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, is less well defined. We studied the incidence of injury to the ALL and the pattern of this injury on MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following Institutional Review Board approval, a retrospective study of 375 consecutive MRI studies was performed. Cases were identified from a prospective database of ACL reconstruction patients. Following exclusions, 280 MRIs (277 patients; 197 males: 80 females; mean age 30.2 years, range, 16-54) were evaluated. Injury was defined as full thickness, partial thickness, or an avulsion fracture. Each study was independently assessed by two consultant musculoskeletal radiologists. RESULTS: Injury to the ALL was identified (by at least one observer) in only 10.7% of cases (2.50% full thickness, 7.50% partial thickness, and 0.71% avulsion fracture). There was an almost perfect level of interobserver agreement for both the identification of an injury (κ = 0.854) and grading of injury (κ = 0.858). The MRI incidence of ALL injury was significantly greater within 6 weeks of the knee injury (18.5 vs. 8.37%; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: ALL injury was identified in only one-tenth of cases of ACL rupture. MRI changes can be reliably identified with strong agreement between observers. ALL injury is found more frequently on MRI within 6 weeks of the knee injury (compared to scans performed after this time period) suggesting that some injuries may resolve or become less visible.
Entities:
Keywords:
Anterior cruciate ligament; Anterolateral ligament; Knee; Magnetic resonance imaging
Authors: Pieter Van Dyck; Stefan Clockaerts; Filip M Vanhoenacker; Valérie Lambrecht; Kristien Wouters; Eline De Smet; Jan L Gielen; Paul M Parizel Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-01-08 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: E Monaco; A Ferretti; L Labianca; B Maestri; A Speranza; M J Kelly; C D'Arrigo Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2011-08-30 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Jack Porrino; Ezekiel Maloney; Michael Richardson; Hyojeong Mulcahy; Alice Ha; Felix S Chew Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Atul K Taneja; Frederico C Miranda; Cesar A P Braga; Corey M Gill; Luiz G C Hartmann; Durval C B Santos; Laercio A Rosemberg Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2014-11-27 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Pieter Van Dyck; Eline De Smet; Valérie Lambrecht; Christiaan H W Heusdens; Francis Van Glabbeek; Filip M Vanhoenacker; Jan L Gielen; Paul M Parizel Journal: Semin Musculoskelet Radiol Date: 2016-04-14 Impact factor: 1.777