Literature DB >> 27663034

In Vivo Anterolateral Ligament Length Change in the Healthy Knee During Functional Activities-A Combined Magnetic Resonance and Dual Fluoroscopic Imaging Analysis.

Willem A Kernkamp1, Samuel K Van de Velde2, Ali Hosseini1, Tsung-Yuan Tsai1, Jing-Sheng Li1, Ewoud R A van Arkel2, Guoan Li3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To measure the in vivo anterolateral ligament (ALL) length change in healthy knees during step-up and sit-to-stand motions.
METHODS: Eighteen healthy knees were imaged using magnetic resonance and dual fluoroscopic imaging techniques during a step-up and sit-to-stand motion. The ALL length change was measured using the shortest three-dimensional wrapping path, with its femoral attachment located slightly anterior-distal (ALL-Claes) or posterior-proximal (ALL-Kennedy) to the fibular collateral ligament attachment. The ALL length measured from the extended knee position of the non-weight-bearing magnetic resonance scan was used as a reference to normalize the length change.
RESULTS: During the step-up motion (approximately 55° flexion to full extension), both the ALL-Claes and ALL-Kennedy showed a significant decrease in length of 21.2% (95% confidence interval 18.0-24.4, P < .001) and 24.3% (20.6-28.1, P < .001), respectively. During the sit-to-stand motion (approximately 90° flexion to full extension), both the ALL-Claes and ALL-Kennedy showed a consistent, significant decrease in length of 35.2% (28.8-42.2, P < .001) and 39.2% (32.4-46.0, P < .001), respectively. From approximately 90° to 70° of flexion, a decrease in length of approximately 6% was seen; 70° of flexion to full extension resulted in an approximately 30% decrease in length.
CONCLUSIONS: The ALL was found to be a nonisometric structure during the step-up and sit-to-stand motion. The length of the ALL was approximately 35% longer at approximately 90° of knee flexion when compared with full extension and showed decreasing length at lower flexion angles. Similar ALL length change patterns were found with its femoral attachment located slightly anterior-distal or posterior-proximal to the fibular collateral ligament attachment. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These data suggest that, if performing anatomic ALL reconstruction, graft fixation may be performed beyond 70° flexion to reduce the chance of lateral compartment overconstraint. Anatomic ALL reconstruction may affect the knee kinematics more in high flexion than at low flexion angles.
Copyright © 2016 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27663034      PMCID: PMC5179307          DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  32 in total

1.  The 6 degrees of freedom kinematics of the knee after anterior cruciate ligament deficiency: an in vivo imaging analysis.

Authors:  Louis E Defrate; Ramprasad Papannagari; Thomas J Gill; Jeremy M Moses; Neil P Pathare; Guoan Li
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2006-04-24       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 2.  Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Ganesh V Kamath; John C Redfern; Patrick E Greis; Robert T Burks
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Erratum to "The change in length of the medial and lateral collateral ligaments during in vivo knee flexion".

Authors:  Sang Eun Park; Louis E DeFrate; Jeremy F Suggs; Thomas J Gill; Harry E Rubash; Guoan Li
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  An anatomic study of the iliotibial tract.

Authors:  Eduardo Luís Cruells Vieira; Eduardo Alvaro Vieira; Rogério Teixeira da Silva; Paulo Augusto dos Santos Berlfein; Rene Jorge Abdalla; Moisés Cohen
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  The Anterolateral Ligament: An Anatomic, Radiographic, and Biomechanical Analysis.

Authors:  Mitchell I Kennedy; Steven Claes; Fernando Augusto Freitas Fuso; Brady T Williams; Mary T Goldsmith; Travis Lee Turnbull; Coen A Wijdicks; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  The anterolateral ligament: Anatomy, length changes and association with the Segond fracture.

Authors:  A L Dodds; C Halewood; C M Gupte; A Williams; A A Amis
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.082

7.  Behavior of the anterolateral structures of the knee during internal rotation.

Authors:  C Lutz; B Sonnery-Cottet; L Niglis; B Freychet; P Clavert; P Imbert
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 2.256

8.  Posterolateral structures of the knee in posterior cruciate ligament deficiency.

Authors:  Michal Kozanek; Eric C Fu; Samuel K Van de Velde; Thomas J Gill; Guoan Li
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  In Vivo Length Changes of the Anterolateral Ligament and Related Extra-articular Reconstructions.

Authors:  Samuel K Van de Velde; William A Kernkamp; Ali Hosseini; Robert F LaPrade; Ewoud R van Arkel; Guoan Li
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Correlation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Knee Anterolateral Ligament Anatomy: A Cadaveric Study.

Authors:  Camilo Partezani Helito; Paulo Victor Partezani Helito; Marcelo Batista Bonadio; José Ricardo Pécora; Marcelo Bordalo-Rodrigues; Gilberto Luis Camanho; Marco Kawamura Demange
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2015-12-16
View more
  9 in total

1.  The anterolateral ligament: a closed chapter?

Authors:  Willem A Kernkamp; Guoan Li; Samuel K Van de Velde
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-10

2.  An in Vivo Simulation of Isometry of the Anterolateral Aspect of the Healthy Knee.

Authors:  Willem A Kernkamp; Samuel K Van de Velde; Tsung-Yuan Tsai; Ewoud R A van Arkel; Peter D Asnis; Rob G H H Nelissen; Robert F LaPrade; Bertram Zarins; Guoan Li
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 3.  [Research progress in anterolateral ligament of knee].

Authors:  Zhong Zhang; Kaibo Zhang; Beini Mao; Sike Lai; Jian Li; Weili Fu
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-05-15

4.  An Overview of Clinically Relevant Biomechanics of the Anterolateral Structures of the Knee.

Authors:  Mitchell I Kennedy; Christopher M LaPrade; Andrew G Geeslin; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  Tech Orthop       Date:  2017-12-25

5.  Influence of the Anterolateral Ligament on Knee Laxity: A Biomechanical Cadaveric Study Measuring Knee Kinematics in 6 Degrees of Freedom Using Dynamic Radiostereometric Analysis.

Authors:  Emil Toft Nielsen; Kasper Stentz-Olesen; Sepp de Raedt; Peter Bo Jørgensen; Ole Gade Sørensen; Bart Kaptein; Michael Skipper Andersen; Maiken Stilling
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-08-10

6.  Minimally Invasive Ultrasound-Guided Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction With Autologous 2-Strand Gracilis Graft.

Authors:  Etienne Cavaignac; Marie Castoldi; Vincent Marot; Louis Courtot; Gauthier Gracia; Nicolas Reina
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2019-06-05

7.  Effect of Time After Injury on Tibiofemoral Joint Kinematics in Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Deficient Knees During Gait.

Authors:  Changzhao Li; Yulin Lin; Willem A Kernkamp; Hong Xia; Zefeng Lin
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-07-21

8.  In vivo length change of ligaments of normal knees during dynamic high flexion.

Authors:  Kenichi Kono; Shoji Konda; Takaharu Yamazaki; Sakae Tanaka; Kazuomi Sugamoto; Tetsuya Tomita
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-08-15       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 9.  Biomechanical Effects of Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shayne R Kelly; Brendan M Cutter; Eric G Huish
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-06-24
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.