Literature DB >> 24796230

Incidence of clinically significant percutaneous spinal cord stimulator lead migration.

Halena M Gazelka1, Eric D Freeman, W Michael Hooten, Jason S Eldrige, Bryan C Hoelzer, William D Mauck, Susan M Moeschler, Matthew J Pingree, Richard H Rho, Tim J Lamer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the incidence of percutaneous spinal cord stimulator lead migration, given current hardware and surgical technique.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed records of patients who underwent spinal cord stimulator implantation with percutaneous leads at our institution from 2008 through 2011. We determined the number of patients who required surgical revision for clinically significant lead migration.
RESULTS: Clinically significant lead migration requiring surgical revision occurred in three of 143 patients (2.1%) with primary SCS system implants utilizing percutaneous-type leads.
CONCLUSIONS: The rate of lead migration observed in our practice was considerably lower than previously published estimates of clinically significant lead migration or revision for lead migration (13%-22%). However, our study did not determine the reason for the decreased rate, which may be influenced by current hardware and implant techniques.
© 2014 International Neuromodulation Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Neuromodulation; revision; stimulator

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24796230     DOI: 10.1111/ner.12184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuromodulation        ISSN: 1094-7159


  10 in total

Review 1.  Spinal cord stimulation programming: a crash course.

Authors:  Breanna Sheldon; Michael D Staudt; Lucian Williams; Tessa A Harland; Julie G Pilitsis
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Explantation Rates and Healthcare Resource Utilization in Spinal Cord Stimulation.

Authors:  Jing L Han; Kelly R Murphy; Syed Mohammed Qasim Hussaini; Siyun Yang; Beth Parente; Jichun Xie; Promila Pagadala; Shivanand P Lad
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2017-02-15

3.  Peripheral Nerve Stimulation in Pain Management: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jijun Xu; Zhuo Sun; Jiang Wu; Maunak Rana; Joshua Garza; Alyssa C Zhu; Krishnan V Chakravarthy; Alaa Abd-Elsayed; Ellen Rosenquist; Hersimren Basi; Paul Christo; Jianguo Cheng
Journal:  Pain Physician       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Reoperation Rates of Percutaneous and Paddle Leads in Spinal Cord Stimulator Systems: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Devin D Antonovich; Willy Gama; Alexandra Ritter; Bethany Jacobs Wolf; Ryan H Nobles; Meron A Selassie; M Gabriel Hillegass
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 3.637

5.  Migration of Epidural Leads During Spinal Cord Stimulator Trials.

Authors:  Robert H Jenkinson; Andrew Wendahl; Yue Zhang; Jill E Sindt
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 2.832

6.  Drivers and Risk Factors of Unplanned 30-Day Readmission Following Spinal Cord Stimulator Implantation.

Authors:  Aladine A Elsamadicy; Amanda Sergesketter; Xinru Ren; Syed Mohammed Qasim Hussaini; Avra Laarakker; Shervin Rahimpour; Tiffany Ejikeme; Siyun Yang; Promila Pagadala; Beth Parente; Jichun Xie; Shivanand P Lad
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2017-09-29

7.  Twelve-Month results from multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled clinical trial comparing differential target multiplexed spinal cord stimulation and traditional spinal cord stimulation in subjects with chronic intractable back pain and leg pain.

Authors:  Michael Fishman; Harold Cordner; Rafael Justiz; David Provenzano; Christopher Merrell; Binit Shah; Julian Naranjo; Philip Kim; Aaron Calodney; Jonathan Carlson; Richard Bundschu; Mahendra Sanapati; Vipul Mangal; Ricardo Vallejo
Journal:  Pain Pract       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 3.079

8.  Limitations of spinal cord stimulation for pain management.

Authors:  Jae Hang Shim
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-08

9.  Images in Practice: Successful Recapture of Spinal Cord Stimulator Paresthesia Coverage via Generator Reprogramming in a Patient with a Severely Displaced Percutaneous Trial Lead.

Authors:  Ruben H Schwartz; Ivan Urits; Marc Solomon; Vwaire Orhurhu; Alan D Kaye; Omar Viswanath
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2019-12-27

Review 10.  A Retrospective Review of Lead Migration Rate in Patients Permanently Implanted with Percutaneous Leads and a 10 kHz SCS Device.

Authors:  Mayank Gupta; Alaa Abd-Elsayed; Meghan Hughes; Anand Rotte
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 3.037

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.