Literature DB >> 33613793

A Retrospective Review of Lead Migration Rate in Patients Permanently Implanted with Percutaneous Leads and a 10 kHz SCS Device.

Mayank Gupta1, Alaa Abd-Elsayed2, Meghan Hughes2, Anand Rotte3.   

Abstract

Background: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been used over decades for pain management, but migration of percutaneous leads has been the most common complication. Better surgical techniques and newer SCS technologies likely reduced the incidence of lead migration requiring surgical revision, although data are sparse. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the incidence of clinically significant percutaneous lead migration in patients permanently implanted with a 10 kHz SCS system.
Methods: Consecutive patients with chronic trunk and/or limb pain, permanently implanted between January 2016 and June 2019, were included in the analysis. Data were collected from the hospital's electronic medical records and the manufacturer's database. Clinically significant lead migration, defined as diminished pain relief followed by surgery to correct lead location, was assessed at the 6-month follow-up.
Results: At the 6-month follow-up, there were no cases of clinically significant lead migration, average pain relief was 65.2%, 82% of patients had response (≥50% pain relief), improvement of function was noted in 72% of patients, and decrease of medication was observed in 42% of patients. Therapy efficacy was sustained in patients with >12 months follow-up; the average pain relief was 58.5%, and the response rate was 82%. Conclusions: The surgical techniques in use today are designed to minimise the risk of percutaneous lead migration and may have reduced its incidence. In addition, new SCS systems may give greater opportunity to mitigate cases of minor lead movement using alternative stimulation programs.
Copyright © 2021 Mayank Gupta et al.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33613793      PMCID: PMC7878096          DOI: 10.1155/2021/6639801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Res Manag        ISSN: 1203-6765            Impact factor:   3.037


  55 in total

1.  Spinal cord stimulation versus repeated lumbosacral spine surgery for chronic pain: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Richard B North; David H Kidd; Farrokh Farrokhi; Steven A Piantadosi
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  Comparison of Clinical Efficacy and Computed Tomographic Analysis of Lead Position Between Three-Column and Five-Column Paddle Leads Spinal Cord Stimulation for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome.

Authors:  Jin-Gyu Choi; Sang-Woo Ha; Byung-Chul Son
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.104

Review 3.  Improving care of chronic pain patients with spinal cord stimulator therapy amidst the opioid epidemic.

Authors:  Mayank Gupta; Alaa Abd-Elsayed; Nebojsa Nick Knezevic
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 3.307

4.  Complications of spinal cord stimulation, suggestions to improve outcome, and financial impact.

Authors:  Krishna Kumar; Jefferson R Wilson; Rod S Taylor; Shivani Gupta
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2006-09

5.  Novel 10-kHz High-frequency Therapy (HF10 Therapy) Is Superior to Traditional Low-frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Back and Leg Pain: The SENZA-RCT Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Leonardo Kapural; Cong Yu; Matthew W Doust; Bradford E Gliner; Ricardo Vallejo; B Todd Sitzman; Kasra Amirdelfan; Donna M Morgan; Lora L Brown; Thomas L Yearwood; Richard Bundschu; Allen W Burton; Thomas Yang; Ramsin Benyamin; Abram H Burgher
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Spinal Cord Stimulation vs Conventional Therapies for the Treatment of Chronic Low Back and Leg Pain: A Systematic Review of Health Care Resource Utilization and Outcomes in the Last Decade.

Authors:  Charles A Odonkor; Sebastian Orman; Vwaire Orhurhu; Martha E Stone; Shihab Ahmed
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.750

Review 7.  Safety and efficacy of spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain: a 20-year literature review.

Authors:  Tracy Cameron
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  10 kHz SCS therapy for chronic pain, effects on opioid usage: Post hoc analysis of data from two prospective studies.

Authors:  Adnan Al-Kaisy; Jean-Pierre Van Buyten; Roy Carganillo; David Caraway; Bradford Gliner; Jeyakumar Subbaroyan; Catherine Panwar; Anand Rotte; Kasra Amirdelfan; Leonardo Kapural
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  High-frequency spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic back pain patients: results of a prospective multicenter European clinical study.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Van Buyten; Adnan Al-Kaisy; Iris Smet; Stefano Palmisani; Thomas Smith
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2012-11-30

10.  High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation at 10 kHz for the Treatment of Combined Neck and Arm Pain: Results From a Prospective Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Kasra Amirdelfan; Ricardo Vallejo; Ramsin Benyamin; Cong Yu; Thomas Yang; Richard Bundschu; Thomas L Yearwood; B Todd Sitzman; Bradford Gliner; Jeyakumar Subbaroyan; Anand Rotte; David Caraway
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 4.654

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Neuromodulation in the Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: A Review of Evidence for Spinal Cord Stimulation.

Authors:  Natalie H Strand; Adam R Burkey
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2021-11-29

2.  Single Lead Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation Targeted Trunk Control and Standing in Complete Paraplegia.

Authors:  Ashraf S Gorgey; Jan J Gouda
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 3.  Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy-A Narrative Review of Pharmacological and Interventional Approaches.

Authors:  Mayank Gupta; Nebojsa Nick Knezevic; Alaa Abd-Elsayed; Mahoua Ray; Kiran Patel; Bhavika Chowdhury
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2021-05-19
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.