Literature DB >> 28961362

Drivers and Risk Factors of Unplanned 30-Day Readmission Following Spinal Cord Stimulator Implantation.

Aladine A Elsamadicy1, Amanda Sergesketter1, Xinru Ren2, Syed Mohammed Qasim Hussaini1, Avra Laarakker1, Shervin Rahimpour1, Tiffany Ejikeme1, Siyun Yang2, Promila Pagadala1, Beth Parente1, Jichun Xie2, Shivanand P Lad1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Unplanned 30-day readmission rates contribute significantly to growing national healthcare expenditures. Drivers of unplanned 30-day readmission after spinal cord stimulator (SCS) implantation are relatively unknown. The aim of this study was to determine drivers of 30-day unplanned readmission following SCS implantation.
METHODS: The National Readmission Database was queried to identify all patients who underwent SCS implantation for the 2013 calendar year. Patients were grouped by readmission status, "No Readmission" and "Unplanned 30-day Readmission." Patient demographics and comorbidities were collected for each patient. The primary outcome of interest was the rate of unplanned 30-day readmissions and associated driving factors. A multivariate analysis was used to determine independent predictors of unplanned 30-day readmission after SCS implantation.
RESULTS: We identified 1521 patients who underwent SCS implantation, with 113 (7.4%) experiencing an unplanned readmission within 30 days. Baseline patient demographics, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics were similar between both cohorts. The three main drivers for 30-day readmission after SCS implantation include: 1) infection (not related to SCS device), 2) infection due to device (limited to only hardware infection), and 3) mechanical complication of SCS device. Furthermore, obesity was found to be an independent predictor of 30-day readmission (OR: 1.86, p = 0.008).
CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that infectious and mechanical complications are the primary drivers of unplanned 30-day readmission after SCS implantation, with obesity as an independent predictor of unplanned readmission. Given the technological advancements in SCS, repeated studies are necessary to identify factors associated with unplanned 30-day readmission rates after SCS implantation to improve patient outcomes and reduce associated costs.
© 2017 International Neuromodulation Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Infection; low back pain; obesity; readmission; spinal cord stimulator

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28961362      PMCID: PMC5766416          DOI: 10.1111/ner.12689

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuromodulation        ISSN: 1094-7159


  29 in total

1.  Does 30-day readmission affect long-term outcome among glioblastoma patients?

Authors:  Miriam Nuño; Diana Ly; Alicia Ortega; J Manuel Sarmiento; Debraj Mukherjee; Keith L Black; Chirag G Patil
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  Spinal cord stimulators: typical positioning and postsurgical complications.

Authors:  Elcin Zan; Kubra Neslihan Kurt; David M Yousem; Paul J Christo
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Morbid obesity increases cost and complication rates in spinal arthrodesis.

Authors:  Paul A Kalanithi; Robert Arrigo; Maxwell Boakye
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Patient Body Mass Index is an Independent Predictor of 30-Day Hospital Readmission After Elective Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Aladine A Elsamadicy; Owoicho Adogwa; Victoria D Vuong; Ankit I Mehta; Raul A Vasquez; Joseph Cheng; Isaac O Karikari; Carlos A Bagley
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 2.104

5.  The impact of obesity on short- and long-term outcomes after lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Rafael De la Garza-Ramos; Mohamad Bydon; Nicholas B Abt; Daniel M Sciubba; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Ali Bydon; Ziya L Gokaslan; Bruce Rabin; Timothy F Witham
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Spinal cord stimulation for chronic low back pain: a systematic literature synthesis.

Authors:  J A Turner; J D Loeser; K G Bell
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 7.  Safety and efficacy of spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain: a 20-year literature review.

Authors:  Tracy Cameron
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  State of the field survey: spinal cord stimulator use by academic pain medicine practices.

Authors:  Christopher Gharibo; Gary Laux; Brian R Forzani; Christopher Sellars; Eric Kim; Shengping Zou
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 3.750

9.  Spinal cord stimulation: a 20-year retrospective analysis in 260 patients.

Authors:  Enrique Reig; David Abejón
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2009-07

10.  Incidence of clinically significant percutaneous spinal cord stimulator lead migration.

Authors:  Halena M Gazelka; Eric D Freeman; W Michael Hooten; Jason S Eldrige; Bryan C Hoelzer; William D Mauck; Susan M Moeschler; Matthew J Pingree; Richard H Rho; Tim J Lamer
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2014-05-05
View more
  3 in total

1.  Spinal Cord Stimulation Infection Rate and Risk Factors: Results From a United States Payer Database.

Authors:  Steven M Falowski; David A Provenzano; Ying Xia; Alissa H Doth
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2018-08-17

2.  Thirty- and 90-day Readmissions After Spinal Surgery for Spine Metastases: A National Trend Analysis of 4423 Patients.

Authors:  Aladine A Elsamadicy; Andrew B Koo; Wyatt B David; Cheryl K Zogg; Adam J Kundishora; Christopher S Hong; Gregory A Kuzmik; Ramana Gorrepati; Pedro O Coutinho; Luis Kolb; Maxwell Laurans; Khalid Abbed
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 3.241

3.  Spinal Cord Stimulator Paddle Lead Surgery Complicated by Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak and Fistula Formation.

Authors:  Namath S Hussain; Jorrdan N Bissell; Vadim Gospodarev; Adil Hussain
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-04-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.