The marine globin dehaloperoxidase-hemoglobin (DHP) from Amphitrite ornata was found to catalyze the H2O2-dependent oxidation of monohaloindoles, a previously unknown class of substrate for DHP. Using 5-Br-indole as a representative substrate, the major monooxygenated products were found to be 5-Br-2-oxindole and 5-Br-3-oxindolenine. Isotope labeling studies confirmed that the oxygen atom incorporated was derived exclusively from H2O2, indicative of a previously unreported peroxygenase activity for DHP. Peroxygenase activity could be initiated from either the ferric or oxyferrous states with equivalent substrate conversion and product distribution. It was found that 5-Br-3-oxindole, a precursor of the product 5-Br-3-oxindolenine, readily reduced the ferric enzyme to the oxyferrous state, demonstrating an unusual product-driven reduction of the enzyme. As such, DHP returns to the globin-active oxyferrous form after peroxygenase activity ceases. Reactivity with 5-Br-3-oxindole in the absence of H2O2 also yielded 5,5'-Br2-indigo above the expected reaction stoichiometry under aerobic conditions, and O2-concentration studies demonstrated dioxygen consumption. Nonenzymatic and anaerobic controls both confirmed the requirements for DHP and molecular oxygen in the catalytic generation of 5,5'-Br2-indigo, and together suggest a newly identified oxidase activity for DHP.
The marine globin dehaloperoxidase-hemoglobin (DHP) from Amphitrite ornata was found to catalyze the H2O2-dependent oxidation of monohaloindoles, a previously unknown class of substrate for DHP. Using 5-Br-indole as a representative substrate, the major monooxygenated products were found to be 5-Br-2-oxindole and 5-Br-3-oxindolenine. Isotope labeling studies confirmed that the oxygen atom incorporated was derived exclusively from H2O2, indicative of a previously unreported peroxygenase activity for DHP. Peroxygenase activity could be initiated from either the ferric or oxyferrous states with equivalent substrate conversion and product distribution. It was found that 5-Br-3-oxindole, a precursor of the product 5-Br-3-oxindolenine, readily reduced the ferric enzyme to the oxyferrous state, demonstrating an unusual product-driven reduction of the enzyme. As such, DHP returns to the globin-active oxyferrous form after peroxygenase activity ceases. Reactivity with 5-Br-3-oxindole in the absence of H2O2 also yielded 5,5'-Br2-indigo above the expected reaction stoichiometry under aerobic conditions, and O2-concentration studies demonstrated dioxygen consumption. Nonenzymatic and anaerobic controls both confirmed the requirements for DHP and molecular oxygen in the catalytic generation of 5,5'-Br2-indigo, and together suggest a newly identified oxidase activity for DHP.
A longstanding question
in catalysis is how structure plays a role
in influencing chemical reactivity. This is readily apparent in heme
proteins where O2-binding, oxygenase, oxidase, peroxygenase,
and electron-transfer reactions all occur at active sites that often
contain a surprising number of similarities, both structural and,
by consequence, mechanistic. For example, the reactive heme species
known as Compound I contains an Fe(IV)-oxo (ferryl) and porphyrin
π-cation radical and has been implicated in the mechanisms of
cytochrome c oxidase,[1] cytochrome P450 monooxygenase,[2] human
indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase,[3] the fungal
peroxygenase AaeAPO,[4] horseradish
peroxidase,[5] and prostaglandin endoperoxidase
synthase (cyclooxygenase)[6] and has even
been shown to form in myoglobin.[7] Despite
the common intermediate, the chemical reactivity of each of the aforementioned
systems remains exquisitely controlled by the protein structure[6] to ensure maximum intended function with a minimum
of unintended cross reactivity. How nature achieves this control for
the selectivity of function continues to be of interest, yet remains
a significant challenge to fully understand.Our chosen platform for the elaboration of the structural features
and other determinants that impart specific discrete functions to
heme proteins is the enzyme dehaloperoxidase (DHP), the coelomic hemoglobin
from the marine wormAmphitrite ornata.[8−10] DHP has also been shown to possess a biologically relevant peroxidase
activity that is believed to have arisen from the evolutionary pressure
to overcome high levels of volatile brominated secondary metabolites
that are secreted as repellents by other infaunal marine organisms
that co-inhabit the benthic ecosystems within which A. ornata is found.[10,11] The oxidative dehalogenation
of 2,4,6-trihalophenol yielding 2,6-dihaloquinone (Figure 1) has been investigated for both known isoenzymes
of DHP (A and B).[12−23] The DHP peroxidase cycle can be initiated from both the ferric and
ferrous (or oxyferrous) oxidation states.[17,22] When starting from the ferric state, DHP appears to function via
a Poulos–Kraut type mechanism[24] in
which H2O2 reacts with a ferric heme to form
DHP Compound I,[18,21] the iron(IV)-oxo porphyrin π-cation
radical species that is formally two electrons oxidized relative to
the ferric resting state. Compound I rapidly converts in DHP to an
iron(IV)-oxo heme center with an amino acid radical that has been
termed Compound ES by analogy with cytochrome c peroxidase.[13−15,18,21] These peroxide-activated forms of DHP return to the ferric resting
state upon oxidation of substrate in what is likely two consecutive
one-electron steps.[20] Thus, although the
activated heme of dehaloperoxidase can theoretically support a direct
oxygen atom transfer, no peroxygenase activity has been reported for
DHP.
Figure 1
Reaction of DHP with trihalogenated phenols and hydrogen peroxide
yields quinone products.
Reaction of DHP with trihalogenated phenols and hydrogen peroxide
yields quinone products.In an effort to identify whether DHP is capable of oxygen
atom
transfer chemistry, we have expanded the substrate scope of our reactivity
studies to include other halometabolites that are native to the marine
environment of A. ornata. Given the diversity of
naturally occurring organobromine compounds found in benthic ecosystems
(e.g., mono-, di-, and tribromophenols, mono- and dibromovinylphenols,
bromopyrroles),[25−27] we have limited the current study to brominated indoles,
as these have been isolated from several species of the Hemichordata
phylum that cohabitate with A. ornata in coastal
estuaries,[28,29] and may represent another family
of chemical deterrents evolutionarily targeted by A. ornata and DHP. Furthermore, similar marine-related indoles and their derivatives
continue to gain interest as antimicrobial and/or anticancer agents
(e.g., meridianins, fascaplysin)[30−33] and are emerging as a new class
of compounds for further study.Herein, we have investigated
the ability for DHP to catalyze the
oxidation of haloindoles in the presence of H2O2. The reaction products were identified in the presence and absence
of labeled peroxide, and the results provide unequivocal evidence
that DHP is capable of a previously unreported peroxygenase activity
that is similar to that observed for the peroxide shunt pathways of
both P450 monooxygenase and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase.[2,34−36] The peroxygenase activity was observed to be initiated
from either the ferric or oxyferrous states, with the enzyme returning
to the oxyferrous state upon completion of its activity due to an
unusual product-driven oxidase reaction that ultimately forms indigo
derivatives as products. The fact that the peroxygenase activity is
initiated from, and returns to, the oxyferrous state is likely related
to the primary function of DHP of serving as an oxygen transport protein,
yet also highlights the plasticity of the DHP active site for supporting
multiple enzymatic functions.
Results
DHP-Catalyzed Haloindole
Reactivity with H2O2
The hydrogen peroxide-dependent
oxidation of haloindoles
as catalyzed by ferric WTDHP B at pH 7 was monitored by HPLC. Reactions
were initiated upon addition of 500 μM H2O2 to a solution containing 10 μM enzyme and 500 μM indole,
incubated at 25 °C for 5 min and then quenched with catalase.
Reactivity was greatest with 5-Br-indole (Table 1), but overall a <1.5-fold difference in reactivity was observed
as the position of the bromine substituent was varied (5-Br ≈
7-Br > 4-Br > 6-Br). Indole itself also showed reactivity, albeit
2-fold lower than 5-Br-indole. Reactivity across the halogen series
of 5-X-indoles was also <2-fold varied and was observed as follows:
Br > Cl ≈ I > F ≈ H. These results suggest that
neither
the sterics nor the electronics of the substrate play a significant
role in its conversion. No reactivity was observed when either DHP
(non-enzymatic control) or peroxide (non-oxidant control) were excluded
from the reaction.
Table 1
Enzyme-Catalyzed
Reactivity of Haloindolesa
enzyme
conversion (%)
Substrate Variation
DHP B Ferric
+ indole
24.1 (±2.3)
+ 4-Br-indole
41.1 (±2.0)
+ 5-Br-indole
48.1 (±2.3)
+ 6-Br-indole
34.4 (±0.6)
+ 7-Br-indole
46.1 (±1.7)
+ 5-F-indole
26.0 (±1.3)
+ 5-Cl-indole
37.5 (±1.6)
+ 5-I-indole
34.0 (±2.0)
+ tryptophan
n.d.b
Enzyme Variation
DHP B Oxyferrous
+ 5-Br-indole
44.9 (±4.8)
DHP B (Y28/38F) Ferric
+ 5-Br-indole
62.2 (±2.5)
DHP A Ferric
+ 4-Br-indole
15.7 (±0.7)
+ 5-Br-indole
20.3 (±1.7)
HRP
+ 5-Br-indole
n.d.
hhMb
+ 5-Br-indole
n.d.
Mechanistic Probes
DHP B Ferric
anaerobic + 4-Br-indole
40.1 (±0.9)
anaerobic + 5-Br-indole
53.3
(±0.3)
DHP B Ferric (+ 5-Br-indole)
+ 500 μM mannitol
46.2
(±1.6)
+ 500 mM formate
45.8 (±1.1)
+ SODc
46.1 (±0.7)
+ 10% DMSO
45.0 (±4.4)
+ 500 μM 4-BP
23.2 (±5.1)
pH Effects
DHP B Ferric (+
5-Br-indole)
pH 5
63.4 (±0.1)
pH 6
54.7 (±1.9)
pH 7
48.1 (±2.2)
pH 8
34.4 (±2.4)
Reaction conditions:
[haloindole]
= [H2O2] = 500 μM, [enzyme] = 10 μM,
5% MeOH in 100 mM KPi buffer at pH 7 (unless indicated),
25 °C, 5 min.
n.d.
= none detected.
SOD = ∼2
U/μL.
The reactivity with 5-Br-indole was virtually
identical for oxyferrous DHP B compared to the ferric enzyme, indicating
that the reaction can be initiated from either the globin active (FeII–O2) or peroxidase-active (FeIII) states, a result that has been observed previously for TCP oxidation.[17,22] The mutant DHP B(Y28F/Y38F), which forms Compound I rather than
the Compound ES species observed in WT DHP B,[18] was only 1.3-fold more reactive with 5-Br-indole, which is approximately
in line with the ratio of the catalytic efficiencies (kcat/Km) of these two enzymes
for TCP oxidation (∼1.6).[18] WT DHP
B was also found to be ∼2.4-fold more reactive than WT DHP
A, which is nearly identical to the ratio observed (2.6-fold) for
TCP oxidation.[14] In the presence of 500
μM 4-bromophenol, a known inhibitor of TCP oxidation,[37] a 2-fold attenuation in reactivity was observed
for 5-Br-indole.Reaction conditions:
[haloindole]
= [H2O2] = 500 μM, [enzyme] = 10 μM,
5% MeOH in 100 mM KPi buffer at pH 7 (unless indicated),
25 °C, 5 min.n.d.
= none detected.SOD = ∼2
U/μL.Reactions performed
in the presence of radical scavengers (DMSO,
sodium formate, d-mannitol) and superoxide dismutase (SOD)
all showed nearly equivalent 5-Br-indole reactivity when compared
to the reaction run in their absence. No changes in product distribution
were observed by HPLC (vide infra) in the presence
of these radical scavengers. Reactions performed anaerobically under
N2 showed no decrease in reactivity, consistent with previous
studies of WT DHP B and TCP that demonstrated an O2-independent
reaction pathway.[14,17] Finally, studies performed with
horseradish peroxidase (HRP) or horse heart myoglobin (Mb), the respective
archetypes of the peroxidase and globin superfamilies, showed no reactivity
with 5-Br-indole substrate.
Identification of Reaction Products by HPLC
A representative
HPLC trace at 242 nm is shown in Figure 2A
for studies performed with 5-Br-indole (1). Products
were identified by their characteristic retention time and electronic
absorption spectrum as compared to authentic samples (Figure S1), by similarity to those of their respective
unsubstituted analogue when the halogenated versions were not commercially
available,[36] and/or by mass spectrometry
(vide infra). Two major products were identified:
5-Br-2-oxindole (1c, 44%) and 5-Br-3-oxindolenine (1a, ∼47% as determined from mass balance). Minor products
were also noted: the doubly oxygenated products 5-Br-2,3-dioxindole
(1b, 2.9%) and 5-Br-3-hydroxy-2-oxindole (1d, 3.7%), the pyrrole ring-opened product N-(4-Br-2-formylphenyl)formamide
(1e, 0.6%), and the indigo derivative (E)-5,5′-dibromo-[2,2′-biindolinylidene]-3,3′-dione
(1f, ∼2%).
Figure 2
(A) HPLC chromatogram of the reaction
of 5-Br-indole (500 μM)
with DHP B (10 μM) in the presence of H2O2 (500 μM) at 25 °C (5% MeOH in 100 mM KPi,
pH 7). The reaction was quenched upon addition of catalase and subjected
to HPLC analysis as described in the text. (B) Product distribution
for the reaction described in panel A under variable [H2O2].
(A) HPLC chromatogram of the reaction
of 5-Br-indole (500 μM)
with DHP B (10 μM) in the presence of H2O2 (500 μM) at 25 °C (5% MeOH in 100 mM KPi,
pH 7). The reaction was quenched upon addition of catalase and subjected
to HPLC analysis as described in the text. (B) Product distribution
for the reaction described in panel A under variable [H2O2].Control reactions with
5-Br-2-oxindole as the substrate under the
same reaction conditions showed no further chemistry, suggesting no
secondary oxidation products were derived from this species. 5-Br-3-oxindole
was not observed directly, with its oxidation likely giving rise to
the observed 5-Br-3-oxindolenine and/or secondary oxidation products
(vide infra). A similar product distribution was
observed for studies performed with indole (Figure
S2A).
Product Distribution as
a Function of H2O2 Concentration
The
distribution of products for studies
performed with 5-Br-indole (500 μM) was monitored as a function
of H2O2 concentration (Figure 2B). With one exception, the formation of all products was
linear as a function of peroxide concentration up to 100 μM
([indole] > [H2O2]), yet reached a plateau
above
500 μM ([indole] < [H2O2]). The ratio
of the products formed was nearly constant regardless of the H2O2 concentration employed (Table S1). The lack of further product formation under conditions
of excess peroxide is in line with previous observations that DHP
enters a peroxidase-attenuated state, Compound RH,[8,13−15,18] under conditions of
low [substrate]. As the exception, 5-Br-2,3-dioxindole formed linearly
throughout the tested H2O2 concentration range,
suggesting a non-enzymatic process under conditions of excess peroxide.
A similar H2O2 concentration-dependent product
distribution profile was observed for studies performed with indole
(Figure S2B, Table S1).ESI-MS total
ion chromatograms obtained for the reaction
products 5-Br-2-oxindole (A: H218O, H216O2; C: H216O, H218O2) and 5-Br-3-oxindolenine (B: H218O, H216O2; D:
H216O, H218O2). Reaction conditions: [haloindole] = [H2O2] = 500 μM, [enzyme] = 10 μM, 5% MeOH in 100 mM KPi (pH 7), 25 °C.
Isotopically Labeled Oxygen Studies
As the observed
reactivity was O2-independent (anaerobic study, Table 1), studies employing labeled H218O2 and H218O (90% and 98% oxygen
atom enriched, respectively) were performed with 5-Br-indole and subsequently
analyzed by LC-MS to determine the source of the oxygen atom incorporation.
The background-subtracted total ion chromatograms (TICs) are shown
in Figure 3. The isotopic distributions for
the major products observed, 5-Br-2-oxindole and 5-Br-3-oxindolenine,
were determined using previously established methods.[36,38] Products were identified by the respective m/z of the (M + H)+ ion and retention time as compared
to available standards. In the absence of an 18O source,
both 5-Br-2-oxindole (m/z: 212,
99.2%; 214:100%) and 5-Br-3-oxindolenine (m/z: 210, 96.9%; 212:100%) exhibited masses with the expected
ca. 1:1 isotopic distribution for bromine (Table
S2). In the presence of H218O and unlabeled
H2O2, neither product exhibited an increase
in mass: 5-Br-2-oxindole (m/z: 212,
99.8%; 214, 100%; Figure 3A) and 5-Br-3-oxindolenine
(m/z: 210, 100%; 212, 99.4%; Figure 3B). The parent ions also exhibited their expected
∼1:1 relative abundance, and thus solvent water was ruled out
as the source of the oxygen atom incorporated. These same experiments
employing H218O2 and unlabeled H218O showed a clear increase to higher mass for
both products by 2 Da: 5-Br-2-oxindole (m/z: 212, 6.1%; 214, 100%; 216, 75.8%; Figure 3C) and 5-Br-3-oxindolenine (m/z: 210, 4.7%; 212, 100%; 214, 89.5; Figure 3D). The results showed a 97+% 18O enrichment (normalized),
providing unequivocal evidence that the oxygen atom was derived from
H2O2. The minor dioxygenated products were of
too low concentration to be observed, and their origins were not pursued
further at the time.
Figure 3
ESI-MS total
ion chromatograms obtained for the reaction
products 5-Br-2-oxindole (A: H218O, H216O2; C: H216O, H218O2) and 5-Br-3-oxindolenine (B: H218O, H216O2; D:
H216O, H218O2). Reaction conditions: [haloindole] = [H2O2] = 500 μM, [enzyme] = 10 μM, 5% MeOH in 100 mM KPi (pH 7), 25 °C.
In studies with indole (m/z: 134, 100%; Table S2), the oxygen incorporated into the respective 2-oxindole product
was derived from H218O2 (m/z: 134, 10.1%; 136, 100%; ∼100%
normalized 18O enrichment) and not from H218O (m/z: 134, 100%; 136,
0.8%), consistent with the results from above for 5-Br-indole. However,
the results for the 3-oxindolenine product showed some scrambling
of the label. Experiments run in H218O2 and unlabeled water exhibited 51.8% 18O enrichment (normalized),
whereas those run with H218O and unlabeled water
yielded minimal label incorporation (5.5%). Reactions performed with
both H218O2 and H218O showed 60.1% 18O enrichment. The reasons for
why the 18O enrichment for 5-Br-3-oxindolenine was nearly
quantitative versus ∼50% for 3-oxindolenine for experiments
performed under identical reaction conditions and work-up times remain
unclear.(A) Resonance Raman spectra of 5-X-indole (500 μM; X = F,
Cl, Br, I) complexes of DHP B (50 μM) in 10% MeOH/100 mM KPi (v/v) at pH 7. (B) Geometry optimized structure for 5-Br-indole.
The 5-bromoindole model was obtained by replacement of 4-bromophenol
in the PDB 3LB2 structure.[37] In this model, the bromine
atom is located in the Xe binding site[39] as observed in the 4-bromophenol structure. (C) Geometry optimized
structure for 7-Br-indole. The native substrate 2,4,6-tribromophenol
(2,4,6-TBP) in the structure PDB 4HF6(40) was substituted
with 7-bromoindole. Since diatomic O2 was observed bound
to the hemeFe in that structure, the bound O2 was preserved
in this model.
Resonance Raman Studies
Resonance Raman spectra were
collected of ferric WTDHP B in the presence of 10 equiv haloindoles
in 10% MeOH/100 mM KPi (v/v) at pH 7. Compared to aqueous
buffer, there is a significant increase in the 6-coordinated high
spin (6cHS) hemeFe in 10% MeOH buffer solution. The red spectrum
in Figure 4A shows that the hemeFe is nearly
100% 6cHS with H2O bound to the hemeFe, while in aqueous
solution there is a mixture of 5-coordinated high spin (5cHS) and
6cHS metaquo heme as observed in previous work.[37] Presumably, this arises from a destabilization of the distal
histidine (His55) in the solvent exposed (or “open”)
conformation in the 10% MeOH buffer solution. The
fact that His55 appears to favor the internal or “closed”
conformation means that the contrast shown in Figure 4A between free DHP (no added indole substrate) and the various
indole substrates is larger than observed in previous work in aqueous
solution.
Figure 4
(A) Resonance Raman spectra of 5-X-indole (500 μM; X = F,
Cl, Br, I) complexes of DHP B (50 μM) in 10% MeOH/100 mM KPi (v/v) at pH 7. (B) Geometry optimized structure for 5-Br-indole.
The 5-bromoindole model was obtained by replacement of 4-bromophenol
in the PDB 3LB2 structure.[37] In this model, the bromine
atom is located in the Xe binding site[39] as observed in the 4-bromophenol structure. (C) Geometry optimized
structure for 7-Br-indole. The native substrate 2,4,6-tribromophenol
(2,4,6-TBP) in the structure PDB 4HF6(40) was substituted
with 7-bromoindole. Since diatomic O2 was observed bound
to the heme Fe in that structure, the bound O2 was preserved
in this model.
Neither indole nor bromoindoles (4-, 6-, or 7-Br)
caused a significant perturbation in the high-frequency region (Figure S3) when compared to the DHP only sample.
However, 5-Br-indole exhibited an increase in the core size marker
bands (ν3 = 1494 cm–1; ν2 = 1569 cm–1; ν10 = 1630
cm–1) attributed to 5cHS heme and a decrease in
those for 6cHS heme (ν3 = 1477 cm–1; ν2 = 1563 cm–1). As such, the
spectra for the 5-substituted halogen series were investigated (Figure 4A). A decrease in the modes assigned to the 6cHS
heme population and an increase in those for 5cHS heme that follows
the halogen series (I > Br > Cl > F) was observed.Similar observations for halophenols have been noted,[37,41] where their binding to DHP has been shown to perturb the relative
population of 5cHS vs 6cHS high spin ferric heme. Specifically, 4-halophenols,
known inhibitors of DHP,[37] bind in the
distal pocket, displacing the distal histidine (His55)
into an “open” or solvent exposed confirmation. This
limits the availability of His55 to stabilize an iron-bound
water ligand through hydrogen bonding, thus shifting the relative
population from primarily 6cHS heme to predominantly 5cHS heme, with
the magnitude of the shift correlating with the size of the halogen
atom.[37,41] We envision a similar process occurring
here with 5-haloindoles, where their binding to the active site of
DHP results in the displacement of the distal histidine, loss of the
water ligand, and increase in the 5cHS heme population. As shown in
Figure 4B, the geometry optimized structure
for 5-Br-indole binding to DHP B, where the indole occupies the space
right above the hemeiron (i.e., the monohalophenol inhibitor site),
is consistent with this hypothesis. By contrast, the geometry optimized
structure shown in Figure 4C shows that the
DHP B active site can accommodate a 6cHS heme when 7-Br-indole is
bound off of the α-edge of the heme (i.e., the trihalophenol
substrate site). These calculations show that 5-bromo- and 7-bromoindole
fit in the inhibitor and substrate binding sites, respectively, consistent
with the results from the resonance Raman spectroscopic studies.
5-Haloindole Binding Studies
The electronic absorption
spectra of ferric DHP B in the presence of 50 equiv 5-Br-indole [402
(Soret), 508, 540 (sh), 585, 635 nm] and alone [407 (Soret), 507,
540 (sh), 635 nm] were recorded in 100 mM KPi (pH 7) containing
10% MeOH (v/v) (Figure S4). Using the observed
hypochromicity and hypsochromic shift of the Soret band upon 5-Br-indole
binding, optical difference spectra were recorded per literature protocol
as a function of substrate concentration (2.5–100 equiv; Figure S5).[42] Analysis
by nonlinear regression provided a calculated Amax of 0.51, which was in turn used to calculate α for
the average ΔA for each [5-Br-indole]. A second
nonlinear regression plot provided an apparent dissociation constant
(Kd) of 150 ± 10 μM. Similarly,
the Kd values were experimentally determined
for the other 5-substituted halogens (5-Cl-indole: 317 ± 23 μM;
5-I-indole: 62 ± 10 μM). No significant changes in the
optical difference spectra were observed for 5-F-indole even at the
highest concentrations tested, and as such its binding affinity was
suggested to be weaker than 5-Cl-indole. Overall, a trend in Kd was observed of increasing binding affinity
as the size of the halogen atom was increased: F < Cl < Br <
I. For the latter three indoles whose Kd values were experimentally determined, all exhibited higher affinity
for DHP than 4-bromophenol (Kd ∼
1.2 mM),[37] a known inhibitor of the enzyme.
Stopped-Flow Studies with Ferric DHP B
Double-mixing
stopped-flow UV–vis spectroscopic methods were used to investigate
the reaction of 5-Br-indole with H2O2-activated
DHP, preformed either as Compound ES (WT DHP) or Compound I [DHP B(Y28F/Y38F)].
Ferric WTDHP B (10 μM) was reacted with 10 mol equiv of H2O2 at pH 7, incubated for 350 ms to allow for the
maximum accumulation of Compound ES,[14] and
subsequently mixed with 10, 25, or 50 equiv of 5-Br-indole. When reacted
with 10 equiv substrate (Figure 5), the preformed
Compound ES [UV–vis: 418 (Soret), 545, 583 nm] was rapidly
reduced [kobs = (2.54 ± 0.05) ×
105 M–1 s–1] to a species
whose spectral features we attribute to substrate- (or possibly product-)
bound ferric DHP B [406 (Soret), 508, 540 (sh), and 633 nm] (see Figure S4 for comparison). For substrate concentrations
≥25 equiv 5-Br-indole, no Compound ES was observed. Rather,
it was rapidly reduced within the mixing time of the stopped-flow
apparatus (<2.5 ms), and only the ferric enzyme was observed initially.
For all substrate concentrations examined, the ferric enzyme was found
to convert to a species [418 (Soret), 544, 577, 590 (sh) nm] that
is similar, but not identical, to Compound ES/II (these two species
being indistinguishable by optical spectroscopy for DHP[17,18]) and is described as indole-derived ferryl DHP (vide infra). This was likely attributable to the reaction of the initially
produced ferric enzyme with the excess H2O2 employed
in this study. At longer observation times, a new species [414 (Soret),
540, 577 nm; kobs = (1.39 ± 0.08)
× 10–2 s–1] was noted whose
spectral features matched those of a mixture of oxyferrous DHP B and
the ferric enzyme.[14,17] Under these conditions of excess
substrate, Compound RH, the stable form of DHP that forms from H2O2 activation in the absence of substrate, was
not observed.
Figure 5
Kinetic data obtained by optical spectroscopy for the
reaction
of preformed Compound ES with 5-Br-indole. (A) Stopped-flow UV–vis
spectra of the double-mixing reaction of preformed DHP B Compound
ES (10 μM), itself formed in an initial mixing step from ferric
DHP reacted with a 10-fold excess of H2O2 in
an aging line for 350 ms, with a 10-fold excess of 5-Br-indole at
pH 7.0 (800 scans over 83 s). Inset: The single wavelength (418 nm)
dependence on time obtained from the raw spectra and its fit with
a superposition of the calculated spectral components. (B) Calculated
spectra of the four reaction components derived from the SVD analysis:
Compound ES (black), ferric DHP B in the presence of excess 5-Br-indole
(blue), ferryl DHP in the presence of 5-Br-indole (red), and a mixture
of oxyferrous and ferric DHP B (purple). (C) Time dependences of the
relative concentrations for the four components shown in the middle
panel as determined from the fitting of the spectra in the top panel.
Kinetic data obtained by optical spectroscopy for the
reaction
of preformed Compound ES with 5-Br-indole. (A) Stopped-flow UV–vis
spectra of the double-mixing reaction of preformed DHP B Compound
ES (10 μM), itself formed in an initial mixing step from ferricDHP reacted with a 10-fold excess of H2O2 in
an aging line for 350 ms, with a 10-fold excess of 5-Br-indole at
pH 7.0 (800 scans over 83 s). Inset: The single wavelength (418 nm)
dependence on time obtained from the raw spectra and its fit with
a superposition of the calculated spectral components. (B) Calculated
spectra of the four reaction components derived from the SVD analysis:
Compound ES (black), ferric DHP B in the presence of excess 5-Br-indole
(blue), ferryl DHP in the presence of 5-Br-indole (red), and a mixture
of oxyferrous and ferric DHP B (purple). (C) Time dependences of the
relative concentrations for the four components shown in the middle
panel as determined from the fitting of the spectra in the top panel.The 5-Br-indole reactivity studies
performed with preformed Compound
I using DHP B(Y28F/Y38F) were qualitatively the same as those reported
above for preformed Compound ES using WT DHP B (Figure S6) with the exception that no activated enzyme (i.e.,
preformed Compound I [406 (Soret), 528, and 645 nm])[18] was observed. Rather, substrate- (or possibly product-)
bound ferric DHP B(Y28F/Y38F) [401 (Soret), 508, 540 (sh) nm] was
the first spectrum recorded, and a conversion to oxyferrous DHP B(Y28F/Y38F)
[415 (Soret), 542, 578 nm] was noted after 697 or 120 s for reactions
performed with 10 or 50 equiv 5-Br-indole, respectively.The
main observations from these studies employing ferric DHP B
were (i) both Compound ES and Compound I were rapidly reduced by 5-Br-indole
to the ferric enzyme, and (ii) ferric DHP was further reduced to oxyferrous
DHP. Reduction of ferric DHP to the oxyferrous form has been previously
observed with dichloroquinone,[13,14,17] the product of trichlorophenol oxidative dehalogenation by DHP,
which suggested that a reaction product related to the 5-Br-indole
reactivity described above may have led to a similar product-driven
reduction chemistry being observed.
Stopped-Flow Studies with
Oxyferrous DHP B
As previously
reported, oxyferrous DHP is only activated toward reactivity with
H2O2 (forming Compound II)[17] in the presence of 1 equiv TCP substrate.[17,22] In the absence of substrate, a slight bleaching of the Soret band
and/or long time scale conversion to Compound RH have been noted,
but no fast time scale reactive intermediates were observed. Such
substrate-dependent activation of DHP was investigated here with indole
substrates using stopped-flow methods. Upon rapid mixing of a solution
of oxyferrous DHP B preincubated with 2.5 equiv of 5-Br-indole with
5 equiv of H2O2, substantial spectral changes
were observed (Figure 6). The oxyferrous form converted to a species whose spectral features
[420 (Soret), 544, 584 nm; kobs = (3.30
± 0.01) × 10–2 s–1]
matched those of Compound II formed from our previous identification
of this species when employing TCP as the substrate.[17] However, when higher equivalents of indole were employed,
the intermediate observed had spectral features that were similar
[420 (Soret), 545, 578, 584 (sh) nm] (data not shown; vide
infra), but not identical, to authentic TCP-derived Compound
II. We surmise that the presence of the indole in the active site
led to these minor spectral differences. The indole-derived Compound
II species was found to convert at longer times to the ferric enzyme.
Overall, 5-Br-indole was found to activate oxyferrous DHP toward reactivity
with H2O2 via a Compound II intermediate.
Figure 6
Kinetic data
obtained by optical spectroscopy for the reaction
of oxyferrous DHP B with 5-Br-indole and hydrogen peroxide. (A) Stopped-flow
UV–vis spectra of the single-mixing reaction between oxyferrous
DHP B (10 μM) preincubated with 2.5 equiv 5-Br-indole and a
5-fold excess of H2O2 at pH 7.0 (800 scans over
83 s). Inset: The single wavelength (418 nm) dependence on time obtained
from the raw spectra and its fit with a superposition of the calculated
spectral components. (B) Calculated spectra of the three reaction
components derived from the SVD analysis: oxyferrous DHP B (black),
a mixture of oxyferrous DHP with 5-Br-indole (blue), and DHP B Compound
II (red). (C) Time dependences of the relative concentrations for
the three components shown in the middle panel as determined from
the fitting of the spectra in the top panel.
Kinetic data
obtained by optical spectroscopy for the reaction
of oxyferrous DHP B with 5-Br-indole and hydrogen peroxide. (A) Stopped-flow
UV–vis spectra of the single-mixing reaction between oxyferrous
DHP B (10 μM) preincubated with 2.5 equiv 5-Br-indole and a
5-fold excess of H2O2 at pH 7.0 (800 scans over
83 s). Inset: The single wavelength (418 nm) dependence on time obtained
from the raw spectra and its fit with a superposition of the calculated
spectral components. (B) Calculated spectra of the three reaction
components derived from the SVD analysis: oxyferrous DHP B (black),
a mixture of oxyferrous DHP with 5-Br-indole (blue), and DHP B Compound
II (red). (C) Time dependences of the relative concentrations for
the three components shown in the middle panel as determined from
the fitting of the spectra in the top panel.Kinetic data obtained by optical spectroscopy for the reaction
of preformed DHP B Compound II with 5-Br-indole. (A) Stopped-flow
UV–vis spectra of the double-mixing reaction between preformed
DHP B Compound II (10 μM) and 25 equiv 5-Br-indole at pH 8.0
(800 scans over 83 s). DHP B Compound II was itself formed from an
initial reaction between oxyferrous DHP B preincubated with 1 equiv
trichlorophenol and 10 equiv H2O2 and reacted
for 85 s prior to the second mix with 5-Br-indole. (B) Experimentally
obtained spectra for Compound II derived from TCP (black, t = 2.5 ms), and Compound II observed in the presence of
5-Br-indole (t = 30 s).To further investigate the reactivity of DHP B Compound II,
sequential
double-mixing stopped-flow studies were employed to monitor the reaction
of preformed Compound II with 5-Br-indole substrate. Oxyferrous DHP
B containing 1 equiv TCP was reacted with 10 mol equiv of H2O2 at pH 8, incubated for 85 s to allow for the maximum
accumulation of Compound II [420 (Soret), 545, 584 nm],[17] and subsequently mixed with an additional 10
equiv (Figure S7) or 25 equiv (Figure 7) of 5-Br-indole. Conversion of the Compound II
spectrum from the one in the absence of indole to the one observed
in the presence of indole [420 (Soret), 545, 578, 584 (sh) nm] was
noted in all cases. The disappearance of indole-derived Compound II
and the formation of the ferric enzyme were linearly dependent on
the concentration of 5-Br-indole cosubstrate, yielding a bimolecular
rate constant of (8.15 ± 0.26) × 102 M–1 s–1. At concentrations of 5-Br-indole above 25
equiv, the ferric form of the enzyme was further found to partially
convert to oxyferrous DHP (data not shown) as noted above for other
experiments with this substrate.
Figure 7
Kinetic data obtained by optical spectroscopy for the reaction
of preformed DHP B Compound II with 5-Br-indole. (A) Stopped-flow
UV–vis spectra of the double-mixing reaction between preformed
DHP B Compound II (10 μM) and 25 equiv 5-Br-indole at pH 8.0
(800 scans over 83 s). DHP B Compound II was itself formed from an
initial reaction between oxyferrous DHP B preincubated with 1 equiv
trichlorophenol and 10 equiv H2O2 and reacted
for 85 s prior to the second mix with 5-Br-indole. (B) Experimentally
obtained spectra for Compound II derived from TCP (black, t = 2.5 ms), and Compound II observed in the presence of
5-Br-indole (t = 30 s).
(A) UV–vis spectra
obtained under anaerobic conditions of
5-Br-3-oxindole after addition of liver esterase to a solution of
5-Br-3-acetoxyindole (∼250 μM) in 5% MeOH in 100 mM KPi (pH 7) scanned at times indicated (aerobic). Inset: Spectral
region showing minimal 5,5′-Br2-indigo formation.
(B) UV–vis spectra obtained under aerobic conditions of 5-Br-3-acetoxyindole
(∼250 μM) and ferric DHP B (10 μM) in 5% MeOH in
100 mM KPi (pH 7) prior to (black spectrum) and 0–5
min after the addition of liver esterase. (C) UV–vis spectra
obtained under anaerobic conditions of 5-Br-3-oxindole (∼250
μM) and ferric DHP B (10 μM) from 3 to 12 min after the
addition of liver esterase. Inset: Spectral region showing 5,5′-Br2-indigo formation.
Reactivity Studies of 5-Br-3-oxindole
The primary products
of 5-Br-indole reactivity, identified to be 5-bromo-2-oxindole and
5-bromo-3-oxindolenine (vide supra), were investigated
as the putative reductants that led to the observed formation of oxyferrous
DHP in the above stopped-flow studies. 5-Br-2-oxindole, unreactive
in the HPLC studies above as a substrate, was unable to reduce ferricDHP B even at 100 equiv (data not shown). Thus, our attention focused
on 5-bromo-3-oxindole, the precursor of 5-bromo-3-oxindolenine, as
a potential reductant.In the absence of DHP, UV–vis
spectroscopic monitoring of a 250 μM solution of 5-Br-3-oxindole
(λmax = 383 nm), formed in situ from
the hydrolysis of 5-bromo-3-acetoxyindole by porcine liver esterase
(LE, 45 U), under aerobic conditions showed only a trace of 5,5′-Br2-indigo formation (λmax = 289 and 640 nm;
Figure 8A) after 5 min, likely attributable
to the known (non-enzymatic) oxidation of 3-oxindole and derivatives
by O2.[43] In the presence of
DHP, however, the first spectrum obtained after addition of LE (∼3
s) showed new features [415 (Soret), 543, 577 nm] that closely resembled
those of oxyferrous DHP B with a minor component of ferric enzyme
present, indicative of DHP reduction by 5-Br-3-oxindole and subsequent
binding of O2 under aerobic conditions (Figure 8B). New spectral features at 289, 370, and 659 nm,
corresponding to the formation of 5,5′-Br2-indigo,
were also noted. Full formation of oxyferrous DHP B [418 (Soret),
543, 577 nm] was seen after 2 min, however the reaction proceeded
to generate 5,5′-Br2-indigo throughout the entire
5 min observation period. Using the molar absorptivity coefficient
of indigo (22 140 M–1 cm–1)[44] for 5,5′-Br2-indigo,
we estimate the latter’s concentration after 5 min to be ∼31
μM, or 45-fold greater, when formed in the presence of DHP versus
the absence of enzyme. As a control, the absorption spectrum of 10
μM ferric DHP [407 (Soret), 508 nm] incubated with 250 μM
5-Br-3-acetoxyindole (λmax = 280 nm) exhibited no
spectral changes (data not shown).
Figure 8
(A) UV–vis spectra
obtained under anaerobic conditions of
5-Br-3-oxindole after addition of liver esterase to a solution of
5-Br-3-acetoxyindole (∼250 μM) in 5% MeOH in 100 mM KPi (pH 7) scanned at times indicated (aerobic). Inset: Spectral
region showing minimal 5,5′-Br2-indigo formation.
(B) UV–vis spectra obtained under aerobic conditions of 5-Br-3-acetoxyindole
(∼250 μM) and ferric DHP B (10 μM) in 5% MeOH in
100 mM KPi (pH 7) prior to (black spectrum) and 0–5
min after the addition of liver esterase. (C) UV–vis spectra
obtained under anaerobic conditions of 5-Br-3-oxindole (∼250
μM) and ferric DHP B (10 μM) from 3 to 12 min after the
addition of liver esterase. Inset: Spectral region showing 5,5′-Br2-indigo formation.
Kinetic data obtained by optical spectroscopy
for the reaction
of ferric DHP B with 5-Br-3-oxindole. (A) Stopped-flow UV–vis
spectra of the double-mixing reaction of ferric DHP B (10 μM)
with a 25-fold excess of 5-Br-3-oxindole at pH 7.0 (800 scans over
83 s). 5-Br-3-oxindole was itself formed from an initial reaction
between 5-Br-3-acetoxyindole and liver esterase in an aging line prior
to the second mix with ferric DHP B. (B) Experimentally obtained spectra
for ferric DHP B (black, t = 2.5 ms), oxyferrous
DHP B (blue, t = 8 s), and a mixture of oxyferrous
DHP B and 5,5′-Br2-indigo (red, t = 83 s).When the above enzymatic
reaction was repeated under anaerobic
conditions, the first spectrum obtained after addition of LE in a
glovebox and subsequent removal to the spectrophotometer (∼3
min) in a sealed cuvette showed new features [426 (Soret), 558 nm]
that closely matched those of ferrous DHP B,[17] suggesting reduction of the ferric enzyme by 5-Br-3-oxindole (Figure 8C). 5,5′-Br2-indigo formation
(λmax = 659 nm) was also observed. No other significant
changes in the spectral features were observed at longer times. The
concentration of 5,5′-Br2-indigo was estimated to
be ∼8 μM, or nearly stoichiometric with respect to the
enzyme concentration, under anaerobic conditions after 10 min. Overall,
nearly 4-fold greater 5,5′-Br2-indigo formation
was observed under aerobic (31 μM) versus anaerobic (8 μM)
conditions when DHP was present, both of which were higher than the
non-enzymatic aerobic control (0.7 μM).
O2-Consumption
Studies
The reaction of 5-Br-3-oxindole
(500 μM), formed in situ from the hydrolysis
of 5-bromo-3-acetoxyindole by liver esterase (LE, 45 U), with ferric
WT DHP B (10 μM) at pH 7 was monitored for O2-consumption
using a dissolved oxygen probe. Prior to the addition of LE, the oxygen
concentration was determined to be 17.49 ± 0.20 mg/L (547 ±
6 μM) at room temperature. After 5 min from the addition of
LE, the [O2] was 10.12 ± 0.84 mg/L (316 ± 26
μM) yielding a Δ[O2] of 7.37 ± 0.86 mg/L.
The non-enzymatic control exhibited Δ[O2] of 1.71
± 0.51 mg/L after 5 min.
Stopped-Flow Studies with
5-Br-3-oxindole
Single-mixing
stopped-flow UV–vis spectroscopic methods were used to investigate
the reaction of 25 equiv 5-Br-3-oxindole with 10 μM ferric WTDHP B (Figure 9). Upon their rapid mixing,
oxyferrous DHP B [417 (Soret), 543, 578 nm] formation was observed
after 8 s, in line with the reactivity studies of 5-Br-3-oxindole
described above. At longer observation times, the features related
to oxyferrous DHP remained, whereas a new, broad feature ∼600
nm, suggestive of 5,5′-Br2-indigo, was also observed
to form. When repeated with oxyferrous DHP B (Figure S8), the spectral features of the enzyme were unchanged
as oxyferrous and 5,5′-Br2-indigo formed at the
same rate (kobs = 0.021 ± 0.001 s–1) as was previously observed when starting with the
ferric enzyme. These results suggested that the reactivity with 5-Br-3-oxindole
yielding 5,5′-Br2-indigo could be initiated from
either the ferric or oxyferrous states. Under these conditions, no
Compound RH was observed.
Figure 9
Kinetic data obtained by optical spectroscopy
for the reaction
of ferric DHP B with 5-Br-3-oxindole. (A) Stopped-flow UV–vis
spectra of the double-mixing reaction of ferric DHP B (10 μM)
with a 25-fold excess of 5-Br-3-oxindole at pH 7.0 (800 scans over
83 s). 5-Br-3-oxindole was itself formed from an initial reaction
between 5-Br-3-acetoxyindole and liver esterase in an aging line prior
to the second mix with ferric DHP B. (B) Experimentally obtained spectra
for ferric DHP B (black, t = 2.5 ms), oxyferrous
DHP B (blue, t = 8 s), and a mixture of oxyferrous
DHP B and 5,5′-Br2-indigo (red, t = 83 s).
Double-mixing stopped-flow methods
were also used to investigate the reaction of 5-Br-3-oxindole with
preformed Compound ES (Figure S9). Ferric
WT DHP B (10 μM) was reacted with 5 mol equiv of H2O2 at pH 7, incubated for 350 ms to allow for the maximum
accumulation of Compound ES,[14] and subsequently
mixed with 25 equiv of 5-Br-3-oxindole. After 8 s, Compound ES [UV–vis:
417 (Soret), 545, 590 nm] was converted to a species whose spectral
features we attribute to oxyferrous DHP B [417 (Soret), 543, 578 nm].
At longer observation times, the spectral features of oxyferrous DHP
persisted, while significant 5,5′-Br2-indigo formation
was also noted after 83 s. No Compound RH was observed.
Discussion
The activity studies presented herein demonstrated that dehaloperoxidase
was able to catalyze the conversion of haloindoles, a previously unreported
class of substrate for DHP that is likely physiologically relevant
given their production by infaunal organisms that coinhabit the benthic
ecosystems within which A. ornata resides.[28,29] Activity was observed for all monohaloindoles studied, regardless
of the type of halogen or its position on the six-membered ring; however,
tryptophan itself was not found to be a substrate. Isotope labeling
studies showed that the oxygen atom incorporated into the major (monooxygenated)
products was derived exclusively from hydrogen peroxide, analogous
to the “peroxide-shunt” of cytochrome P450s and indoleamine
2,3-dioxygenase.[2,34−36] In line with
a peroxygenase mechanism, substrate reactivity readily proceeded under
anaerobic conditions as well as in the presence of superoxide dismutase
and radical quenchers. Such peroxygenase chemistry had been previously
unreported for dehaloperoxidase with any substrate.Activation
of most ferric heme proteins by H2O2 generally
leads to Compound I formation, the Fe(IV)-oxo porphyrin
π-cation radical species that is two electrons oxidized compared
to the resting enzyme and has been implicated as the principal reactive
species in peroxidases,[45] P450s,[34,35] and other hemoproteins.[46,47] By contrast, ferric
WT DHP forms Compound ES, a species that like Compound I is also two-electrons
oxidized above resting, yet whose second oxidizing equivalent resides
on an amino acid (tyrosyl radical) rather than on the porphyrin ring.[13,14,18] Our results show that DHP Compound
I and Compound ES are both capable of reacting with haloindoles, with
both being rapidly reduced back to the ferric state (<200 ms for
Compound ES, <2.5 ms for Compound I). By comparison, the reaction
of preformed WT DHP Compound ES with TCP substrate under similar conditions
also reforms the ferric enzyme but is ∼102–104-fold slower (18.5 s).[13,14]While no mechanistic
insight was derived from the stopped-flow
studies for the reduction of the ferryl species given the apparent
time scale of these reactions, a secondary reaction was noted. Namely,
the reduction of the ferric enzyme and formation of oxyferrous DHP
were observed. Two lines of evidence suggested a product-driven reduction
of ferric DHP: first, we have previously observed for ferric DHP that
its reaction with H2O2 and TCP ultimately regenerates
the oxyferrous enzyme and that separately the product of that reaction,
dichloroquinone, is capable of reducing ferric DHP to the oxyferrous
state.[13,14,17] While the
details of that reaction remain poorly understood, we proposed that
the unusually high redox potential of DHP (206 ± 6 mV)[14,16] helped facilitate the reduction of the enzyme by the reaction products
after the initial peroxidase activity was completed.[8] Second, Mauk and co-workers recently described the reduction
of ferric IDO to ferrous IDO by 3-oxindole that was itself generated
as a product during the oxidation of indole by ferric IDO and H2O2.[36] It was these two
precedents of product-driven reduction of a heme protein that provided
the motivation to explore if 5-Br-3-oxindole was able to reduce ferricDHP, which was, in fact, observed to be the case.On the basis
of the results obtained above, and through modification
of the previously established mechanisms for peroxygenases,[2,34−36] we propose the following catalytic cycle for the in vitro hydrogen peroxide-dependent oxidation of haloindoles
by ferric DHP from A. ornata (Scheme 1): ferric DHP reacts with 1 equiv H2O2, forming either Compound I (step i) or Compound ES (step iii). The
reaction of either of these two ferryl species with haloindole leads
to the regeneration of the ferric enzyme (steps ii and iv for Compounds
I and ES, respectively), with incorporation of the oxygen atom into
indole yielding either 5-Br-2-oxindole or 5-Br-3-oxindole. The latter
subsequently reacts with the ferric enzyme, leading to oxyferrous
DHP formation (v) and the observed 5-Br-3-oxindolenine product. The
initial step of substrate reactivity can likely be viewed as hydrogen
atom abstraction to yield an indolyl substrate radical[48,49] and an Fe(IV)–OH that subsequently undergoes oxygen rebound
to generate indoxyl/oxindole; however, we cannot rule out other possible
mechanisms for oxygen atom insertion into an arene,[50] including indole epoxidation via an electrophilic ferryl
species.
Scheme 1
Proposed Peroxygenase Cycle for Ferric and Oxyferrous
Dehaloperoxidase
B
Alternatively, we have previously proposed that, although
counter
to monofunctional peroxidase conventions, a bifunctional peroxidase-hemoglobin
such as DHP may be able to initiate a peroxidase catalytic cycle from
the globin-active oxferrous, and not ferric, state.[8] Oxyferrous DHP reacts with 1 equiv H2O2 in the presence of haloindole substrate forming Compound II (step
vi), analogous to this substrate-dependent activation that has been
observed previously with TCP.[17] At this
point, two possibilities must be considered. The first is that oxindole
formation occurs upon transfer of the oxygen atom from Compound II,
regenerating ferrous DHP which can rebind O2 under aerobic
conditions (not shown). In this pathway, the two-electron chemistry
(Fe2+/Compound II) is occurring in a similar fashion as
in the pathway initiated from the ferric state (Fe3+/Compound
I or ES). Our results, however, suggest that this pathway does not
occur as Compound II reduction clearly yielded the ferric enzyme.
The second possibility is that an initial one-electron process occurs
where the enzyme is reduced from Compound II to the ferric state by
haloindole (step vii) and that the subsequent reactivity proceeds
as described above for a typical peroxidase. Overall, however, it
is clear that peroxygenase chemistry can be initiated from the globin-active
oxyferrous state and that the 3-oxindole reactivity leads back to
this state as well.The oxygen atom transfer chemistry
strongly suggests that the haloindole
substrate must be in close proximity to the active ferryl intermediate
to form the observed products. The results of the haloindole resonance
Raman study can be interpreted in light of the two known halophenol
binding sites. The addition of 5-X-indole (X = I, Br, Cl) to DHP led
to an observed increase in the 5cHS heme population. This is reminiscent
of monohalophenol binding, which has been shown to bind in the distal
pocket above the heme, and forces the distal histidine to a solvent
exposed conformation.[10,37,41,51,52] This ultimately
leads to the loss of the iron-bound water ligand and an increase in
the 5cHS heme population. We suggest a similar binding location for
the 5-haloindoles, as denoted in Figure 4B.
By contrast, none of the other bromoindoles (4-, 6-, or 7-) led to
changes in the resonance Raman spectrum. We interpret this result
to suggest that these substrates bind elsewhere in the distal cavity,
possibly in the recently identified tribromophenol binding site that
is located in the pocket above the α-edge of the heme (Figure 4C).[40,53] Tribromophenol binding to DHP
also does not perturb the resonance Raman spectrum of the ferric enzyme.[14] Given that two binding sites may be present,
structural studies may play an important role in deducing whether
concerted or nonconcerted (radical) mechanisms form the basis for
the observed peroxygenase activity in DHP.Indole oxidation
chemistry has been reported previously: HRP is
reactive toward both indole and derivatives (including 5-Br-3-indole
acetic acid) via a peroxidase mechanism,[49,54] and a recent report has shown that engineered myoglobin is able
to catalyze the oxidation of indole to form indigo blue.[55] Under the conditions examined here, however,
neither of these native monofunctional archetypes of the peroxidase
and globin families, respectively, were reactive toward 5-Br-indole,
a result that highlights the unique reactivity of the dehaloperoxidase-hemoglobin
system. Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase has also been shown to catalyze
the oxidation of indole via a peroxygenase mechanism, however the
product distribution is different.[36] Notably,
the major products of indole oxidation with IDO are 2- and 3-oxindole
in a ∼3:1 ratio when [indole] > [H2O2], vs an ∼1:1 ratio of 2-oxindole and 3-oxindolenine for DHP.
We surmise that the peroxidase activity of DHP led to the oxidation
of 3-oxindole to yield the observed 3-oxindolenine product. Further,
unlike IDO that was found to be reactive with both 2- and 3-oxindole,
DHP exhibited no reactivity toward 5-Br-2-oxindole, a result that
suggests that the minor dioxygented products observed must be derived
exclusively from the 5-Br-3-oxindole pathway, and likely in a similar
fashion that has been reported for P450s.[50,56] Other minor differences between these two enzymes in the product
distribution of the dioxygenated products are also evident, but the
secondary reactions that led to them in DHP were not further explored.The investigation of 5-Br-3-oxindole as the reducing
agent that
led to oxyferrous DHP formation also revealed an unexpected activity
for DHP: not only did the aerobic reaction of ferric DHP with 5-Br-3-oxindole
(in situ generated) immediately form oxyferrous DHP
but also gave 5,5′-Br2-indigo in an amount that
exceeded the predicted reaction stoichiometry. Under anaerobic conditions,
the yield of 5,5′-Br2-indigo was near stoichiometric
with respect to the enzyme concentration, showing that excess O2 was obligatory for the catalytic generation of the indigo
species by DHP. The non-enzymatic, aerobic oxidation of 5-Br-3-oxindole
only produced a trace of 5,5′-Br2-indigo over the
same time scale, showing that DHP was also obligatory for the catalytic
generation of the indigo species. Moreover, O2 consumption
studies showed a significant decrease in dissolved oxygen concentration
beyond that exhibited by the background (non-enzymatic) reaction,
providing confirmatory evidence that the reaction was indeed consuming
molecular oxygen. Taken together, the requirements for both dioxygen
and DHP in the catalytic formation of 5,5′-Br2-indigo
from the respective oxindole demonstrated an apparent oxidase activity
of dehaloperoxidase-hemoglobin. As to the mechanism of the oxidase
activity, based upon these initial observations we propose that, in
analogy with the cytochrome P450 catalytic cycle, the one-electron
reduction of oxyferrous DHP by 5-Br-3-oxindole yields a ferric-peroxo
(Compound 0) intermediate that undergoes O–O bond cleavage
to yield Compound ES. The reaction of Compound ES with 5-Br-3-oxindole,
as supported by the stopped-flow UV–vis spectroscopic studies,
leads to the formation of oxyferrous DHP, likely through a ferric
intermediate that is reduced (as above) to the ferrous enzyme and
subsequently binds dioxygen, thereby enabling the next round of the
oxidase catalytic cycle.
Conclusion
In summary, DHP has now
been shown to possess peroxygenase and
oxidase activities in addition to its previously identified O2-binding and peroxidase functions. What appears to control
for each activity is a complex set of parameters that depends, in
part, on the nature of the substrate as well as the dual identity
of DHP as both an enzyme and a globin: (i) the relatively high redox
potential and protein fold of DHP, hallmarks of the globin family
that impart reversible O2-binding, also lead to its ease
of reduction by 3-oxidole, thereby leading to DHP oxidase activity;
(ii) an active site pocket capable of halophenol and haloindole binding,
unnecessary for an O2 transport globin, supports both peroxidase
and peroxygenase activities, respectively; (iii) a highly flexible
distal histidine ligand capable of both stabilizing bound O2 and serving as a general acid/base catalyst; and (iv) a sterically
hindered substrate in 2,4,6-tribromophenol is a DHP peroxidase substrate,
whereas the unhindered (at the C2 and C3 positions) haloindole is
susceptible to DHP peroxygenase activity, possibly due to the ability
of the ferryl intermediate to perform an electrophilic attack on the
latter. Other factors, such as the reactivity of Compound I vs Compound
ES, the redox potential of the substrate or its pKa, likely are important determinants of enzymatic activity
as well.The diverse range of functions exhibited by DHP highlights
the
versatility of this heme protein. The trade-off in being a more versatile
enzyme is that DHP exhibits catalytic efficiencies below its monofunctional
counterparts, albeit far greater than what is noted as side reactivity
in other systems. This increased versatility at the expense of high
catalytic efficiency is possibly attributable to the nature of the
DHP active site in that it lacks the additional structural features
normally observed in more specialized systems that tune the protein
toward one specific discrete function. Thus, DHP provides a platform
for probing in detail how nature evolved structure–function
relationships in ancestral multifunctional systems of competent catalytic
activity from lower organisms to achieve the complexity necessary
for specialization of function and increased activity observed in
the monofunctional systems of higher organisms.
Experimental
Section
Materials and Methods
Isotopically labeled H218O2 (90% 18O-enriched) and H218O (98% 18O-enriched) were purchased
from Icon Isotopes (Summit, NJ). Acetonitrile (MeCN) was HPLC grade
and all other chemicals were purchased from VWR, Sigma-Aldrich, or
Fisher Scientific and used without further purification. UV–vis
spectroscopy was performed on a Cary 50 UV–vis spectrophotometer.
Stock solutions (10 mM) of all indoles were prepared in MeOH, stored
in the dark at −20 °C until needed, and were periodically
screened by HPLC to ensure that they had not degraded. Aliquots were
stored on ice during use. Solutions of H2O2 were
prepared fresh daily and kept on ice until needed. The concentration
was determined by UV–vis (ε240 = 46 mM–1 cm–1).[57] Ferric and oxyferrous samples of WT DHP B, DHP B (Y28/38F), and
WT DHP A were expressed and purified as previously reported.[13,14,18] Enzyme concentration was determined
spectrophotometrically using εSoret = 116,400 mM–1 cm–1 for all isoenzymes.[14] Lyophilized horseradish peroxidase and horse
heart myoglobin were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and stored at −20
°C until utilized. Anaerobic studies were performed as described
above in an MBraun Lab Master 130 nitrogen-filled glovebox using argon
degassed solutions of buffer, peroxide, substrate and enzyme.
Enzyme
Assay Protocol
Reactions were performed in triplicate
at pH 7 in 5% MeOH in 100 mM KPi at 25 °C. Buffered
solutions (total reaction volume 250 μL) of DHP (10 μM
final concentration) and (halo)indole (500 μM final concentration)
were premixed, and then the reaction was initiated upon addition of
H2O2 (50, 100, 250, 500, or 1000 μM final
concentrations). Experiments were performed in the presence of d-mannitol (500 μM), superoxide dismutase (SOD) (∼2
U/μL), and DMSO (10% v/v). For the studies with sodium formate,
a buffered solution (100 mM KPi; 500 mM sodium formate)
at pH 7 was utilized. After 5 min, reactions were quenched with excess
catalase. A 100 μL aliquot of reaction sample was diluted 10-fold
with 900 μL of 100 mM KPi (pH 7). Diluted samples
were analyzed using a Waters 2796 Bioseparations Module coupled with
a Waters 2996 Photodiode Array Detector and equipped with a Thermo-Scientific
ODS Hypersil (150 mm × 4.6 mm) 5 μm particle size C18 column. Separation of observed analytes was performed using
a linear gradient of binary solvents (solvent A, H2O containing
1% trifluoroacetic acid; solvent B, MeCN). Elution was performed using
the following conditions: (1.5 mL/min A:B) 95:5 to 5:95 linearly over
10 min; 5:95 isocratic for 2 min; 5:95 to 95:5 linearly over 1 min,
and then isocratic for 4 min. Data analysis was performed using the
Empower software package (Waters Corp.). Calibration curves for all
indoles, and available products were performed using serial dilutions
of commercially available analytes to determine the amount of substrate
conversion.
LC-MS Studies
Experiments were analyzed
using a 6210
LC-TOF mass spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA).
Analyte separation was performed using the same conditions and column
as the HPLC studies with the exception of solvent A (water with 0.1%
formic acid). Samples were analyzed using electrospray ionization
in positive ion mode to provide observation of the [M + H]+ species. Spectra were collected each second while scanning in the
range from 100–1000 m/z.
Data analysis was performed using Agilent software. Quantitation of
the amount of 18O-labeled incorporated was performed using
previously established methods.[36,38] In the H218O2 studies, an aliquot of 2.15% (w/w) solution
of 90% enriched H218O2 was diluted
3-fold to provide a peroxide solution at 20 mM concentration. A final
reaction volume (5% MeOH in 100 mM KPi, pH 7) of 250 μL
containing 10 μM enzyme, 50 equiv of substrate, and 50 equiv
of labeled peroxide was allowed to react for 5 min before quenching
with catalase. For the H218O studies, stock
solutions of the reactants ([enzyme] = 120 μM; [H2O2] = 12.5 mM) in unlabeled water were kept at sufficiently
high concentrations to allow for the 98% enriched H218O to be diluted to ∼89% in the final reaction mixture.
Labeled water (207.5 μL) was charged with 21 μL enzyme,
10 μL H2O2, and 12.5 μL substrate
(in MeOH) and reacted for 5 min and then quenched with catalase. A
20 μL aliquot of undiluted reaction mixtures was injected for
LC-MS analysis.
Stopped-Flow UV–vis Studies
Optical spectra
were recorded using a Bio-Logic SFM-400 triple-mixing stopped flow
instrument coupled to a rapid scanning diode array UV–vis spectrophotometer.
The temperature was maintained at 20 °C with a circulating water
bath, and all solutions were prepared in 5% MeOH in 100 mM KPi (variable pH). Data were collected (900 scans total) over
a three-time domain regime (2.5, 25, and 250 ms; 300 scans each) using
the Bio Kinet32 software package (Bio-Logic). All data were evaluated
using the Specfit Global Analysis System software package (Spectrum
Software Associates) and fit to exponential functions as one-step/two-species,
two-step/three species or three-step/four species irreversible mechanisms
where applicable. For data that did not properly fit these models,
experimentally obtained spectra at selected time points shown in the
figure legends are shown. Data were baseline corrected using the Specfit
autozero function.Experiments were performed in single-mixing
mode where enzyme at a final concentration of 10 μM was reacted
with 2.5–25 equiv of H2O2. For substrate
preincubation studies, the enzyme solution also contained substrate
(2.5–50 equiv). Double mixing experiments were performed using
an aging line prior to the second mixing step to observe Compound
ES/Compound I reactivity with 5- or 7-Br-indole substrate (2.5–50
equiv). For studies with 5-Br-3-oxindole, a solution of 5-Br-3-acetoxyindole
in 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer was prepared from a 10 mM stock
solution in pure methanol for final concentrations of 100, 250, or
500 μM. The 5-Br-3-acetoxyindole solutions were loaded into
the stopped-flow syringe, and ∼1 mg (20 U) of liver esterase
was directly added to the syringe and mixed thoroughly, and then the
solution was loaded into the apparatus. Control experiments were also
performed as above in the absence of hydrogen peroxide.
Resonance Raman
Studies
Samples were prepared with
final concentrations of 50 μM WT DHP B and 500 μM substrate
in 100 mM KPi (pH 7) containing 10% MeOH (v/v) and then
transferred to a 5 mm diameter glass NMR tube. Spectra were obtained
by Soret band excitation using a Coherent Mira 900 titanium sapphire
(Ti:sapphire) laser. The Ti:sapphire laser was pumped using a Coherent
Verdi 10 frequency doubled diode pumped Nd:vanadate (Nd:VO4) laser producing 10 W at 532 nm. The beam generated was sent through
a Coherent 5-050 doubler to generate a normal working range of 400–430
nm for Soret band excitation of both DHP only and the DHP/indole complexes.
The beam was collimated and cylindrically focused to a vertical line
of ∼0.5 mm on the sample. Laser power at the sample was 60
mW. Scattered light was collected with a Spex 1877 triple spectrometer
equipped with a liquid nitrogen-cooled CCD detector controlled by
Spectramax software.
Geometry Optimization Studies
The
native substrate
2,4,6-tribromophenol (2,4,6-TBP) in the structure PDB 4HF6(40) was substituted with 7-bromoindole. Since diatomic O2 was observed bound to the hemeFe in that structure, the
bound O2 was preserved in this model. The 5-bromoindole
model was obtained by replacement of 4-bromophenol in the PDB 3LB2 structure.[37] In this model, the bromine atom is located in
the Xe binding site[39] as observed in the
4-bromophenol structure. The parameters for the 5-bromo and 7-bromoindole
molecules were obtained by modification of the tyrosine amino acid
from the CHARMM force field implemented in the NAMD code[58,59] with a charge set calculated using electrostatic potential fitting[60] implemented in the density functional theory
(DFT) code DMol3.[61,62] The DFT calculations were conducted
using a double numerical basis set with polarization functions and
the PBE functional.[63,64] The charge set and templates
for the NAMD topology file are provided in the Supporting Information. The bond stretching, bending, and
torsional parameters for the C–Br bond and associated angles
and dihedrals were obtained from the structure and an estimate of
the relative bond stretching force constant. Visual molecular dynamics
(VMD) was used for visualization and generation of the figures.[65]
Haloindole-Binding Studies
Adapted
from previously
published protocols,[42] stock solutions
of 2 mM 5-X-indole (X = F, Cl, Br and I) in MeOH were prepared. The
UV–vis spectrophotometer was blanked with 10 μM ferric
WT DHP B in 100 mM KPi (pH 7) containing 10% MeOH. Spectra
were then acquired in the presence of 2.5, 5, 10, 25, 50, and 100
equiv of the indole substrates while maintaining both constant enzyme
and MeOH concentrations. Analysis by nonlinear regression using the
GraFit software package (Erithacus Software Ltd.) of the experiments
performed in triplicate provided a calculated Amax, which was in turn used to calculate α for the average
ΔA for each indole concentration. A nonlinear
regression plot provided the reported apparent Kd values.
Studies with 5-Br-3-oxindole
250
μM 5-Br-3-acetoxyindole
was incubated in the presence or absence of 10 μM ferric WTDHP B in 5% MeOH in 100 mM KPi at pH 7 (<1 min) in a
quartz cuvette. Reactions were initiated by the addition of porcine
liver esterase (LE, 45 U), and spectra collected at the times indicated.
Anaerobic studies were initiated in the glovebox, the quartz cuvette
was sealed from the atmosphere, and the spectra were obtained on the
benchtop.
O2-Consumption Studies
All experiments were
performed in triplicate with a Fisher Scientific AR 60 dissolved oxygen
Accumet BOD probe that was standardized in dH2O prior to
use. Solutions of 5-Br-3-acetoxyindole in methanol were freshly prepared
prior to each experiment. Ten mg of liver esterase was dissolved in
500 mL of 100 mM KP buffer and kept on
ice. A 5 mL solution was made containing 10 μM ferric WTDHP
B and 500 μM 5-Br-3-acetoxyindole in 5% MeOH in 100 mM KP buffer (pH 7), and the meter was stabilized
in the solution. A 50 μL aliquot of porcine liver esterase (∼1
U/μL) was added to the 5 mL solution, and the final O2 concentration was measured after 6 min.
Authors: Roman Davydov; Robert L Osborne; Muralidharan Shanmugam; Jing Du; John H Dawson; Brian M Hoffman Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2010-10-27 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Francesco P Nicoletti; Matthew K Thompson; Barry D Howes; Stefan Franzen; Giulietta Smulevich Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2010-03-09 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Tadeo Moreno-Chicano; Ali Ebrahim; Danny Axford; Martin V Appleby; John H Beale; Amanda K Chaplin; Helen M E Duyvesteyn; Reza A Ghiladi; Shigeki Owada; Darren A Sherrell; Richard W Strange; Hiroshi Sugimoto; Kensuke Tono; Jonathan A R Worrall; Robin L Owen; Michael A Hough Journal: IUCrJ Date: 2019-10-10 Impact factor: 4.769
Authors: Tadeo Moreno-Chicano; Leiah M Carey; Danny Axford; John H Beale; R Bruce Doak; Helen M E Duyvesteyn; Ali Ebrahim; Robert W Henning; Diana C F Monteiro; Dean A Myles; Shigeki Owada; Darren A Sherrell; Megan L Straw; Vukica Šrajer; Hiroshi Sugimoto; Kensuke Tono; Takehiko Tosha; Ivo Tews; Martin Trebbin; Richard W Strange; Kevin L Weiss; Jonathan A R Worrall; Flora Meilleur; Robin L Owen; Reza A Ghiladi; Michael A Hough Journal: IUCrJ Date: 2022-07-25 Impact factor: 5.588