Literature DB >> 24790491

Assessment of Isometric Trunk Strength - The Relevance of Body Position and Relationship between Planes of Movement.

Andrej Kocjan1, Nejc Sarabon2.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to assess the differences in maximal isometric trunk extension and flexion strength during standing, sitting and kneeling. Additionally, we were interested in correlations between the maximal strength in sagittal, frontal and transverse plane, measured in the sitting position. Sixty healthy subjects (24 male, 36 female; age 41.3 ± 15.1 yrs; body height 1.70 ± 0.09 m; body mass 72.7 ± 13.3 kg) performed maximal voluntary isometric contractions of the trunk flexor and extensor muscles in standing, sitting and kneeling position. The subjects also performed lateral flexions and rotations in the sitting position. Each task was repeated three times and average of maximal forces was used for data analysis. RANOVA with post-hoc testing was applied to the flexion and extension data. The level of statistical significance was set to p < 0.05. Overall, in both genders together, the highest average force for trunk extension was recorded in sitting posture (910.5 ± 271.5 N), followed by kneeling (834.3 ± 242.9 N) and standing (504.0 ± 165.4 N), compared with flexion, where we observed the opposite trend (508.5 ± 213.0 N, 450.9 ± 165.7 N and 443.4 ± 153.1 N, respectively). Post-hoc tests showed significant differences in all extension positions (p < 0.0001) and between sitting/standing (p = 0.018) and kneeling/standing (p = 0.033) flexion exertions. The extension/flexion ratio for sitting was 2.1 ± 0.4, for kneeling 1.9 ± 0.4, followed by standing, where motion forward approximately equals motion backward (1.1 ± 0.6). Trunk sagittal-transverse strength showed the strongest correlation, followed by frontal-transverse and sagittal-frontal plane correlation pairs (R(2) = 0.830, 0.712 and 0.657). The baseline trunk isometric strength data provided by this study should help further strength diagnostics, more precisely, the prevention of low back disorders. Key pointsMaximal voluntary isometric force of the trunk extensors increased with the angle at the hips (highest in sitting, medium in kneeling and lowest in upright standing).The opposite trend was true for isometric MVC force of trunk flexors (both genders together and men only).In the sitting position, the strongest correlation between MVC forces was found between sagittal (average flexion/extension) and transverse plane (average left/right rotation).IN ORDER TO INCREASE THE VALIDITY OF TRUNK STRENGTH TESTING THE LETTER SHOULD INCLUDE: specific warm-up, good pelvic fixation and visual feedback.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Voluntary force; hip angle; low back pain; testing

Year:  2014        PMID: 24790491      PMCID: PMC3990891     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  38 in total

1.  The function of the psoas major muscle: passive kinetics and morphological studies using donated cadavers.

Authors:  Masaharu Yoshio; Gen Murakami; Toshio Sato; Shuichi Sato; Seiji Noriyasu
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.601

2.  Design and evaluation of a novel triaxial isometric trunk muscle strength measurement system.

Authors:  M R Azghani; F Farahmand; A Meghdari; G Vossoughi; M Parnianpour
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.617

3.  Patterns of muscular activity during movement in patients with chronic low-back pain.

Authors:  A Nouwen; P F Van Akkerveeken; J M Versloot
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Quantification of trunk muscle performance in standing, semistanding and sitting postures in healthy men.

Authors:  O Cartas; M Nordin; V H Frankel; R Malgady; A Sheikhzadeh
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Isometric maximal and submaximal trunk extension at different flexed positions in standing. Triaxial torque output and EMG.

Authors:  J C Tan; M Parnianpour; M Nordin; H Hofer; B Willems
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  The geometry of the psoas muscle as determined by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  J G Reid; L A Livingston; D J Pearsall
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Analysis of lumbar spine and hip motion during forward bending in subjects with and without a history of low back pain.

Authors:  M A Esola; P W McClure; G K Fitzgerald; S Siegler
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Human trunk strength profile in lateral flexion and axial rotation.

Authors:  S Kumar; R M Dufresne; T Van Schoor
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Trunk muscle function and low back disorders: a ten-year follow-up study.

Authors:  P Leino; S Aro; J Hasan
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

10.  Trunk strengths in attempted flexion, extension, and lateral bending in healthy subjects and patients with low-back disorders.

Authors:  T McNeill; D Warwick; G Andersson; A Schultz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1980 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  9 in total

1.  Estimating apparent maximum muscle stress of trunk extensor muscles in older adults using subject-specific musculoskeletal models.

Authors:  Katelyn A Burkhart; Alexander G Bruno; Mary L Bouxsein; Jonathan F Bean; Dennis E Anderson
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 2.  Age-related hyperkyphosis: update of its potential causes and clinical impacts-narrative review.

Authors:  Tayebeh Roghani; Minoo Khalkhali Zavieh; Farideh Dehghan Manshadi; Nicole King; Wendy Katzman
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 3.636

3.  Practicable performance-based outcome measures of trunk muscle strength and their measurement properties: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Authors:  Shouq Althobaiti; Alison Rushton; Ahmad Aldahas; Deborah Falla; Nicola R Heneghan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Acute effect of different concentrations of cayenne pepper cataplasm on sensory-motor functions and serum levels of inflammation-related biomarkers in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Nejc Sarabon; Stefan Löfler; Jan Cvecka; Wolfgang Hübl; Sandra Zampieri
Journal:  Eur J Transl Myol       Date:  2018-03-01

5.  Trunk Muscle Activation Patterns Differ Between Those With Low and High Back Extensor Strength During a Controlled Dynamic Task.

Authors:  D Adam Quirk; Raymond D Trudel; Cheryl L Hubley-Kozey
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2020-01-10

6.  Muscle strength and inflammatory response to the training load in rowers.

Authors:  Tomasz Podgórski; Alicja Nowak; Katarzyna Domaszewska; Jacek Mączyński; Magdalena Jabłońska; Jarosław Janowski; Małgorzata B Ogurkowska
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Reliability and validity of three isometric back extensor strength assessments with different test postures.

Authors:  Sen Yang; Wenjie Wu; Chengmin Zhang; Donggui Wang; Can Chen; Yong Tang; Kai Li; Jianzhong Xu; Fei Luo
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 1.671

8.  Factorial Structure of Trunk Motor Qualities and Their Association with Explosive Movement Performance in Young Footballers.

Authors:  Jasminka Tomčić; Nejc Šarabon; Goran Marković
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-18

9.  Associations between trunk muscle morphology, strength and function in older adults.

Authors:  Behnaz Shahtahmassebi; Jeffrey J Hebert; Mark D Hecimovich; Timothy J Fairchild
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.